this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2025
114 points (95.2% liked)

politics

24692 readers
2958 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 87 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Robber Barons are back in style!

Why is anyone questioning why people want to murder the rich and support social programs more and more. You have just sit and think how much people will take before they absolutely slaughter these fucking pieces of human trash.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 21 hours ago

They throw people in concentration camps without any process, much less due process, get giant tax breaks while taking away people's healthcare, layoff thousands of workers while getting a generous bonus, dump toxic waste in the rivers, use 45% of the corn grown to make ethanol that doesn't solve anything, and say there's not enough room for solar panels.

But don't post Luigi memes because that's inciting violence.

[–] msprout@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

Y'all know why there aren't any more Robber Barons right? ✊👷

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 60 points 20 hours ago

This guy's upset you won't break your back to make him richer.

What a piece of shit.

[–] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 52 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Yeah, you can go fuck yourself with your 7 day work week.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 43 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (8 children)

What I don't get is...they can just hire more people to do the work and expand the company? When you consider this, you realize that they're just asking people to work 40% more without an increase in pay (hence hiring more people is not an option)...then they call it "productivity gains".

[–] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 25 points 21 hours ago

Then they'll complain when no one wants to work those ludicrous hours and they'll sing one of the greatest hits of all time:

"nOBodY WaNts To woRk ANyMorE"

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] doctortofu@piefed.social 42 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Good - nobody needs billion-dollar startups. The line doesn't have to co constantly go up forever. We don't need to constantly improve productivity and do more for less. Fuck that and fuck this "debate".

[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 19 points 18 hours ago

I remember reading about a hotel in Japan that has been open for over a millennium, and IIRC it’s owned by the same family who has owned it for most of that time, and that’s their only business. We need more of that: steady-state businesses that operate but don’t pursue permanent growth.

[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 39 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

"Debate"? What fucking "debate"?

Someone suggests something comedically fucked up and it's now a debate?

Shut the fuck up and sit down, you VC cunt. No one wants to hear your clown-show takes.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 hours ago

Someone suggests something comedically fucked up and it's now a debate?

Yep, this is the legacy of social media. And it's been tearing apart the fabric of society.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 39 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

Stebbings, founder of 20VC, a firm managing $650 million in funds, advised founders on LinkedIn last month that “7 days a week is the required velocity to win right now,” to compete with startups in Silicon Valley and China.

Just from that sentence you can tell the guy leads an impoverished life in ways that won't be fixed by money. But he's going to spend his life chasing money because he can't imagine what else to do with it.

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Just like all the other psychopath techbros, he'll take from everyone else, make everyone miserable, wallow in his superiority, and be a general scouge to Earth in an attempt to fill a void that will always just expand anyways. At the end of the day, they'll always have the most money and still be the poorest people in the world. No amount they exploit from the rest of us will satiate their ravenous, everlasting hunger.

They'll punish us, who they envy for our ability to live rich lives with emotions that they will never experience.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 hours ago

If we're lucky, they'll realize it and kill themselves.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

This sounds like hes just describing an oversaturated market

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

If there's one thing that businessmen and investors demonstrate an appalling lack of understanding of, it's economics.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 28 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Meanwhile, some places have been trying out 4-day 8 hour days, and have found that they retain competent staff who have fewer accidents and make fewer errors, increasing company productivity while reducing wage spend.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 13 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, I'd rather pay for clear-minded hours of a worker, rather than near-burnout hours. But the guy doesn't care, he's trying to compete by saving in wages...at the frontline of tech. It makes no sense either way.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 3 points 16 hours ago

I've told bosses before they can have either my early hours or my best hours, but not both. There's so much waste in our work lives trying to fit to some picture of productivity that isn't actually real. We just play the parts we're required to while getting nothing done.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 22 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Jokes on him: some of the laziest jobs I’ve had were for successful startups.

Hell, I work for a startup right now and spent the last three hours in my hammock watching YouTube.

I get paid for results, not time

[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 8 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Must be nice. I've worked for a couple myself, and all I constantly felt like I was being exploited the entire time.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago

I’ve worked for a few where I was being exploited. One paid me by letting me keep the laptop they bought me.

Then some accountant called me and asked if I still had it.

I said no.

Luckily as you do this more you learn what to look out for. The one I work for now is pretty great.

[–] runiq@feddit.org 19 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Your 'work' and my 'work' are different, Boy Wonder.

collapsed inline media

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] derry@midwest.social 17 points 20 hours ago

Says the dude who counts golfing, diners, other events as "work"

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 17 points 15 hours ago

JFC, I loathe douchebags like this so very much.

[–] gidostro@lemmy.cafe 14 points 21 hours ago

We don’t need a society of billion dollar startups, and we don’t need cunts like him using our oxygen.

[–] salacious_coaster@infosec.pub 12 points 21 hours ago

The rich are ripping the copper out of the walls of society before it all comes crashing down. They burn out employees, throw them away and hire fresh ones. Who cares, they're not planning of any of this lasting much longer.

[–] Mingusdynasty@lemmy.myserv.one 11 points 4 hours ago

Can we just agree as a society that people like this are ruining the world? Maybe if they were treated like the enemies of humanity they are, and exposed to 1% of the misery they cause, it would be a less common genre of shitty person?

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 11 points 17 hours ago

You'll get four and you'll like it.

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 9 points 20 hours ago

Yeah you can fuck yourself with a rusty pitchfork. I'd prefer death over those shitty hours.

[–] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 8 points 15 hours ago

Given how much billion dollar start-ups are ruining our world, wouldn't that be a good thing?

[–] nialv7@lemmy.world 8 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

He might be right, but if he wants me to work more than 5 days a week then I would expect to be compensated accordingly. Otherwise he can fuck off.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 hours ago

I don't even think he is right... Productivity already takes a nose dive at like 40 hours

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 7 points 20 hours ago

I mean this is just how you get any real talent with any real mobility to use that mobility to leave.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

CEOs 996 is 9 hours per week, 9 days per month, 6 months a year right?

[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 4 points 21 hours ago

But it literally did.

[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

I'd be so mindful of how i spoke, if I had a Backpfeifengesicht like him.

[–] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 20 hours ago
[–] sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago (6 children)

996 work culture isn't for everyone - or even most people. But if someone wants to start a company doing something they love and work that much, I say go for it. I started a company, albeit I only work 60/week, doing something I love and working with my family. It isn't the only way, but is the way that works for us. 🤷

[–] meyotch@slrpnk.net 12 points 20 hours ago

That’s fine since you get the upside of the business as an owner. A salaried employee may not. Equity may be offered too, but i have seen enough situations where the capital investors get a payout that leaves those with lesser shares in the cold.

In short, fuck these people, pay me to care and I may choose to help build their business.

One cannot eat pie in the sky.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 6 points 21 hours ago

I'm fine with that, it just sounds like these people think they can commodify that kind of dedication in exchange for much less than what you got creating your own.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hark@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Isn't the point of working hard so that you can take it easy eventually? These psychos never take it easy, the suffering is the point for them.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 4 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

It can be that or it can be the satisfaction of doing useful work well. Venture capitalists don't do useful work so they don't know that satisfaction. And they don't know what else to do but chase money because they lack the capacity to appreciate life as it is and are probably scared to just stop, in case they have to face the void in their heart. Hence their unstoppable, narrow-minded craving for more money.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 hours ago

It's the difference between people who "work to live," vs. those who "live to work."

The latter are borderline sociopaths, at best

load more comments
view more: next ›