this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2025
91 points (82.7% liked)

You Should Know

39675 readers
1270 users here now

YSK - for all the things that can make your life easier!

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with YSK.

All posts must begin with YSK. If you're a Mastodon user, then include YSK after @youshouldknow. This is a community to share tips and tricks that will help you improve your life.



Rule 2- Your post body text must include the reason "Why" YSK:

**In your post's text body, you must include the reason "Why" YSK: It’s helpful for readability, and informs readers about the importance of the content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-YSK posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-YSK posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

If you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- The majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Rule 11- Posts must actually be true: Disiniformation, trolling, and being misleading will not be tolerated. Repeated or egregious attempts will earn you a ban. This also applies to filing reports: If you continually file false reports YOU WILL BE BANNED! We can see who reports what, and shenanigans will not be tolerated.

If you file a report, include what specific rule is being violated and how.



Partnered Communities:

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

Credits

Our icon(masterpiece) was made by @clen15!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A 2023 study at MIT made this discovery, which could be a boon for storing electricity.

The team calculated that a block of nanocarbon-black-doped concrete that is 45 cubic meters (or yards) in size — equivalent to a cube about 3.5 meters across — would have enough capacity to store about 10 kilowatt-hours of energy, which is considered the average daily electricity usage for a household.

3.5 cubic meters of material ought to be enough to make quite a comfy house

There is a tradeoff between the storage capacity of the material and its structural strength, they found. By adding more carbon black, the resulting supercapacitor can store more energy, but the concrete is slightly weaker, and this could be useful for applications where the concrete is not playing a structural role or where the full strength-potential of concrete is not required.

They talk about making roads with the material, but I suspect electrical posts (utility poles) could also be made of this, which would certainly last much longer than roads and be cheaper to maintain and fix

all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 23 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

A lot of shaky stuff in here that has a long way to go before it makes it out of the lab.

3.5 cubic meters of material ought to be enough to make quite a comfy house

OP, a 3.5 m-wide cube is not 3.5 cubic meters. That's the size of a decently large shed... Of solid concrete.

would have enough capacity to store about 10 kilowatt-hours of energy, which is considered the average daily electricity usage for a household

No mention in the article about round trip efficiency, self-discharge rates / storage duration, etc.

Storing 10 kWh doesn't mean much if it loses much of that to internal losses, leakage into the environment, etc., before you can use it.

Capacitors generally tend to be designed to store very little energy but can charge/discharge repeatedly at a high rate. Is this designed to discharge quickly? If so, what happens if someone touches the giant Borg cube in your yard?

Concrete is also prone to cracking, which last I checked, is not good for electronics.

That said, this is an interesting concept, and if it can perform at a useful level / scale, I could see industrial uses for large systems with high peak loads / energy recovery / regenerative braking, as a cost effective way to smooth grid loads, but probably wouldn't expect to see it in use at people's homes for a loooong time.

Less "you can make a super capacitor at home", more "innovative material uses may one day make super capacitors more cost effective for certain applications, if it can be scaled out of a lab"

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 0 points 11 hours ago

Yeah a 3.5m cube is 3.5^3 cubic meters. You gotta change the number the same as the unit. Honestly KL might be better than m^3 for intuitiveness

[–] Krudler@lemmy.world 21 points 5 hours ago

Tired AF of these non YSK posts.

Nobody needs to know this. Nobody.

Especially when it's an unrealized technology that has been "calculated" to be possible.

[–] who@feddit.org 18 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Knowing this makes life easier for practically nobody, so it doesn't really fit this community.

It is cool, though. I think it would make a good Today I Learned.

!til@lemmy.world
!til@lemmy.ca

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Speak for yourself, I might make one!

[–] who@feddit.org 4 points 11 hours ago

I hope you do, and show it off when you're done!

[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 7 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

That’s neat, but a typical house foundation only uses like 10-15 cubic meters of concrete. Even a flat 8” slab for a 40’x40’ house (huge footprint!!!) uses 30 cubic meters of concrete. Only 2/3 the 45 they say.

Concrete is also pricey already ~$250 a meter (CAD, US is close).

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

It is cool, and yes the prototype they made is the size of a coin battery. They made three 1v "super capacitors" and linked them together to light a 3v LED.

That said, my only question was should they ever get it to be able to store and discharge 10kW, wouldn't it necessarily all discharge at once? Like, it's not a battery - but that's a small problem after they've solved the big ones.

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Failed electrical engineering major here - it turned out I was built to be a scientist, not an engineer, but it took a year of EE classes to figure that out.

Regarding energy storage, capacitors aren't much different than batteries, but they can charge/discharge faster, have lower energy density (units of stored energy per units mass), and self-discharge faster, hence why they aren't used in place of batteries. For something where weight and volume aren't an issue and with no need for long-term storage, like a solar-equipped house, a huge cap would be a great option. I'm trying to figure out how to build one of what's described it the article now.

The rate at which a capacitor discharges varies just like a battery, proportional to the resistance of the circuit. The reason most folks associate capacitors with "shorted terminals go boom" is the maximum rate of discharge on a capacitor is much higher than a battery, plus some capacitors operate at a much higher voltage than is practical for a battery, increasing the likelihood of generating a small arc. Shorting the terminals with a conductor makes a low resistance circuit so it just dumps its charge, whereas a battery would max out at a much lower rate, typically making a toasty wire versus a vaporized or melted wire.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago
[–] noxypaws@pawb.social 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

as much as I'd love a giant concrete cube adorning my yard, I doubt most people share my peculiar taste

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

I've been looking for an excuse to get a sphere tho

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 hours ago

I wonder if you could make a 1m thick foundation of this stuff beneath each house which works as a sort of battery for the house in case power goes out.