this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2025
73 points (91.0% liked)

News

30798 readers
3612 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] orclev@lemmy.world 34 points 5 hours ago (5 children)

TL;DR: Small study of only 3 out of 100 brands on the market, so limited inference can be drawn but cheap construction leaches toxic substances into the liquid in ways that older non-disposable vapes don't. In terms of health risk non-disposable vapes are best followed by a tie between traditional cigarettes and disposable vapes.

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 22 points 5 hours ago

Most of the disposable e-cigarettes tested released markedly higher amounts of metals and metalloids into vapors than earlier, refillable vapes.

Yeah, seems to be an issue with a lack of commercial regulation than with the inherent technology itself. I am usually skeptical of any study toting cigarettes as the "safer" option, however this kinda keeps in pace with our society's rapid devolution back to industrial age regulatory standards.

Industry's regulatory and judicial capture seems to rear it ugly head once again at the expense of the public's health.

[–] SheeEttin@lemmy.zip 12 points 5 hours ago

Pretty sure all three of those brands are owned by the same company too.

Also they might leach more metals, but they still don't produce the other known carcinogens in cigarettes.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 12 points 4 hours ago

And those three "brands" are all from the same company, who most certainly just gets them from SE Asia, they probably all come out of the exact same sweatshop.

[–] Gigasser@lemmy.world 2 points 8 minutes ago* (last edited 7 minutes ago)

The particular brands are Elf Bar, Flum, and EscoBar

Edit addendum: heavy metals supposedly came from non heating elements

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 hours ago

In terms of health risk, not intentionally putting chemicals into your lungs that haven't been prescribed by a doctor is best, but non-disposable vapes are a good harm reduction strategy for those who can't get out of the compulsive habit.

[–] SoupBrick@pawb.social 5 points 4 hours ago

The American mind yearns for the lead.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

The scientists analyzed the metal and metalloids inside seven types of disposable devices from three of the most popular brands. Using an instrument to activate the disposable e-cigarettes and heat the internal liquid, they created between 500 and 1,500 puffs for each device. They found:

  • Some devices emitted surprisingly high concentrations of elements in the vapor, including antimony and lead.
  • Levels of chromium, nickel and antimony increased as the number of puffs increased.
  • Most of the disposable e-cigarettes tested released markedly higher amounts of metals and metalloids into vapors than earlier, refillable vapes.

The scientists then took apart the devices to trace the sources of the metals.

“We found that these disposable devices have toxins already present in the e-liquid, or they’re leaching quite extensively from their components into e-liquids and ultimately transferred to the smoke,” Salazar said.