this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2025
42 points (92.0% liked)

Technology

72524 readers
3625 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
42
China’s Next-Gen TV Anchors Hustle for Jobs AI Already Does: The rise of AI in broadcasting is pushing China’s top journalism schools to rethink what skills still set human anchors apart. (www.sixthtone.com)
submitted 1 day ago by Pro@programming.dev to c/technology@lemmy.world
10 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Having artificially generated news anchors seems so bizarre to me.

It's one person that in a country like china will be seen by tens or hundreds of millions of people. Is it really worth it to axe that job and put some uncanny valley CGI figure in their place? The per viewer cost saving must be fractions of a penny, and it risks putting off a not insignificant amount of people.

Now, if initiatives like this can be used for things like generating a figure that can do sign language in the corner of a screen that would be an amazing development, but this? I just don't see it.

I even get it for broadcasting to a very small audience, such as languages with almost no speakers. E.g. having an always-available Welsh language presenter. But this? Nah.

[–] Tetsuo@jlai.lu 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

With the constant stream of news I would suppose it's handy to have some virtual anchor available 24/24 and that you can start in a matter of minutes.

It's cynical of course but I kind of get the idea.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

The AI anchor will never die, grow old, or grow a conscience. It can remain the perfect propaganda operative, A/B test in real time, etc, forever.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The per viewer cost saving must be fractions of a penny.

Why wouldn't you save a fraction of a penny if you could? Out of compassion for a fellow human? That's insane.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

I love this reasoning. Perfectly agree. Must be so unnecessary for large stations. Although I guess this does open up for smaller broadcasters to open news rooms.

But yeah, it would sure put me off. I wasn't to see a human speaking to me.

[–] deafboy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

The per viewer cost saving must be fractions of a penny.

For a national television, sure. For the hundreds of thousands of small influencers seeing this free advertisement on TV, it would be a major cost saving.

Imagine all the ladies from the tiktok mills not having to make funny faces on camera for hours at a time anymore.

[–] deafboy@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Talk about the uncanny valley... They look like an instagram filter dialed up to 11.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

Average Douyin user

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

collapsed inline media

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 5 points 1 day ago

Max headroom would like to have a word.

Things humans can do that ai can't, currently do, politicking, sleeping to the top, building a brand outside of work, demonstrating integrity