this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2025
91 points (97.9% liked)

World News

48224 readers
1804 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gympie_Gympie_pie@sh.itjust.works 56 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Goldiggers are both men and women. Love scams are perpetrated by men all the time, especially online. Creating a game about golddiggers is useful, making it all about women only is sexist and dangerous.

[–] Eximius@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Idk man, I think you neither looked at the statistics, nor lived that long on this world. While true, it is extreme to only have one side of the coin, the other side is just not as likely by statistics...

In the end... it's a game? I mean, I guess I grew up to live with rifles and walk with a switchblade while going to the store. And expect all women to be scantily clad mages walking with staves and high heels.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Eximius@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

It's a tabloid-quality "study", but if you shuck away all the words she uses, and look at the numbers which are more easily attributed to actual gold-digging

There are five million members on SeekingArrangement. Overall, the site has 3.8 million Sugar Babies, and 12% are male: 460,000. Moreover, this is an 84% jump in male Sugar Baby membership from the start of 2014.

Kind of 10 vs 1

Millennial men are also more likely to want to have a prenuptial agreement than males of other generations (32% vs. 25% of Gen X males and 17% of Boomer males) perhaps because they are more likely to be viewing marriage as a financial/contractual arrangement as much as a romantic partnership.

And this is just pure farce. Prenuptial agreements are for protecting from gold-diggers and taking the money away from having to do anything with the marriage. i.e. The opposite. Focusing on romance (if it exists).

To clarify, everybody knows marriage is a financial arrangement. You would have to be an intense fool to ignore that. Whether you do something to protect yourself against unbalanced finances is just a question of your perception of society.

You could probably say I am picking out pieces. And I am. But if you just look at the numbers and ignore the farce of the author, I think you can make more truthful conclusions. (The whole piece reads to me like purposeful twisted propaganda, starting from the title. Or, well, just tabloid-quality journalism)

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Creating a game about golddiggers is useful, making it all about women only is sexist and dangerous.

Why? Most violent games have protagonists and antagonists that are full of men, with no women.

[–] sucoiri@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Classic "all lives matter" take

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Whose take, mine or hers?

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

A Chinese video game on 'gold diggers' is fueling ~~a debate on~~ sexism in China.

Fixed that for you.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 9 hours ago

Yeah, it's more like they're fueling sexism, and are gobsmacked that anyone dares to be bothered by that.

[–] Cypher@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I don’t see a problem with the game

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

Oh no china sexist?!?are they going to kill all the female infants again?