this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2025
2 points (100.0% liked)

Comic Strips

15001 readers
1115 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Honestly with the way the internet exists now, we might feasibly be able to do something closer to direct democracy.

But good luck convincing the people in charge to lay down their power.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Perhaps, though I’d be very concerned for mob mentality. Social media is famously reactive.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No doubt. I think an easy way to counter that is to put a “deliberation” time on legislation. I’m spitballing but maybe require two votes 3 months apart, and they must both agree (otherwise there’s a third tiebreaker vote another 3 months later)? That would help kill off the flash fire effect that a viral meme can create and focus more on fixing problems that occur over a longer period of time.

I mean I’m no political scientist so I’d love to hear more about what methods are proven for direct democracy.

[–] Big_Boss_77@lemmynsfw.com -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Was it... the Persians? Maybe? Anyway, they had to make two choices on any decision, once when drunk and again sober a few days later. If rhe choice was the same both times it was deemed a good idea.

I have zero idea if this is fact, but it sounds similar to your idea.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ooh never heard that but it kinda makes sense

[–] Big_Boss_77@lemmynsfw.com -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I really hope it's not some fever dream, or total bullshit, but it kind of makes sense. I'll see if I can find some facts on it.

Here is a link talking about it, so maybe it's plausible?