this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2025
172 points (93.9% liked)

News

30781 readers
2738 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 69 points 1 day ago

I did Nazi that coming.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 66 points 1 day ago (4 children)

America party

with this kind of creativity is anyone surprised that the cybertruck was so successful and universally loved? true genius savant

The GOP and Democratic sychophants wish that they had renamed their party this first.

[–] floo@retrolemmy.com 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

At least he didn’t call the X party

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

named after the US Nazi party.

"America first party"

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

America first has long been the GOP's motto anyway. you don't need separate parties; they're all the same.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

The mascot will be... the weasel.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 56 points 1 day ago (1 children)

“Time for a new political party that actually cares about the people,” he said.

Yes, because Musk is the first person that comes to mind whenever "actually cares about the people" is mentioned. 🤮

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 1 day ago (4 children)

“It is obvious with the insane spending of this bill, which increases the debt ceiling by a record FIVE TRILLION DOLLARS that we live in a one-party country – the PORKY PIG PARTY!!” Musk said Monday. 

“Time for a new political party that actually cares about the people,” he said.

This shit is hilarious. So he didn’t like the bill because it didn’t make enough cuts? Or is it that it provided too much money for ICE? Either way, he will have plenty of new party members. Stupid people eat this shit up.

[–] Jimbabwe@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Shhh!

“Never interrupt your enemy when they’re in the process of making a mistake”

[–] HurlingDurling@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

He's just trying to apease the frustrated to get a voter base... But the real plan here is to dilute the democratic voter base even further cementing the republicants to stay in power.

If those party comes in 2nd, he'll just conceed and give his votes to the Republican candidate.

If they win, then hell just cozy up to Republicans anyway.

Remember RFK Jr when he ran as independent.

This is THE PLAN

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 day ago

Damn, I had not considered that. I should have known that this was yet another ploy to keep fascism in power. I mean, after the Nazi salute, I should have kept that in mind when examining why he does what he does.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DetectiveNo64@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think it's because it ended EV rebates or something? I try not to follow too closely.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 4 points 14 hours ago

he wasnt getting anymore gov't subsidies, probably.

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I wonder what his party's stance is on taxing the rich.

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

If he'd be smart, he'd do a hiiiigh tax on every rich person. Up to a fortune of, let's say, his fortune. Would be hard to not vote for him then 😁

[–] Catma@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He is 100% not going to do anything. Oh he may say he will but they will never field a single candidate and support Republicans to the hilt. This is at best a way for him to grift

[–] brendansimms@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

the tesla revenue stream is drying up - gotta find a new source

[–] Nay@feddit.nl 18 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Hopefully this will be like a first up tech startup where they are super successful for a while, then someone else comes along and does it better.

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 40 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Hopefully it'll act as a spoiler against the republican candidate, opening the door for a progressive party to also form without causing a far-right candidate to get elected.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm hoping we get ranked choice voting more widespread because of it.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 7 points 1 day ago

Honestly this is a great and perfectly realistic outcome. Of course, assuming ICE doesn't just seize all the voting machines for the next election and Trump wins by 104% (which I think is a lot to ask at this point).

If, somehow, we have free and fair elections coming up, then a splintered right from the bullshit Musk and Joe Rogan put together or whatever, and a splintered left because their constituents want them to stop making it legal to hunt Palestinians for sport, makes it perfectly sensible that the dinosaurs who run our government could declare that some form of post-19th-century voting system that would enable a little bit fairer outcome than FPTP is what's needed. And, when the dinosaurs want something to happen, it usually actually happens, without all this molasses speed when it is merely because of people dying or whatever the problem the regular people are having is.

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Ranked choice still encourages strategic voting. Let's say you have Bernie running as third party and he's your favorite candidate in a ranked voting election.

If you vote for him as #1 and enough people do this, he can potentially eliminate the Democrat candidate. Then when the Democrat votes are transferred to the remaining candidates, there might be enough people who don't like Bernie and transfer their votes to a Republican to make for the Republican winning.

If you rate the Democrat #1 and Bernie #2 then the Democrat candidate might win outright. So voting for your favorite candidate might hurt your second choice

[–] dragontamer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

Elon Musk can't start shit.

The only successes Musk has are when he buys out a leadership position, like Tesla (sued in court to become an official founder).


Andrew Yang is the one to keep an eye out here. Musk has the money but I'm expecting Yang to do the heavy lifting.

Small correction - he started SpaceX, and that company is wildly successful. That's mostly due to the incredible leadership of Gwynne Shotwell; but Musk did actually start that company.

That shouldn't detract from your point, though, because AFAIK that's the only successful company that he personally started

[–] madlian@lemmy.cafe 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Still on that yang train eh? Why do people love rich people? Lmfao

[–] dragontamer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I'm not on YangGang and I never liked that guy.

But it's clear that this new party is Elon Money + Andrew Yang right now. This is somewhat worrying as Yang was a Democrat (albeit one that couldn't win any primary and never reached critical mass, but a Democrat nonetheless). So there's political power here that we need to consider as part of the equation

It gives Elon political cover and makes him look independent and looking like he's splitting the Democrats. So we can't fall for it but people out there will fall for it.

[–] madlian@lemmy.cafe 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Lots of politicians ran under the democrat banner and then switched. What’s that one dude who wore the hoodie and had the stroke and then turned out to be fucking insane? My guess is the stroke wasn’t what made him a republican.

Anyone who possesses the kind of money that they possess, even Yang, are only in it for themselves and their cronies. They all, metaphorically laugh at us in the back room and Yang and Elon just came up with this fun plan to be the next person to dance in front of the crowd.

I think that is why they are afraid of AOC. She didn’t come from money. Sure she’s been able to make some cash speaking and stuff like that but she’s never gonna have hundreds of millions dollars. I would argue that she probably doesn’t want that kind of money anyway.

[–] dragontamer@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

What’s that one dude who wore the hoodie and had the stroke and then turned out to be fucking insane? My guess is the stroke wasn’t what made him a republican.

His staffers were literally crying and large numbers of reports are that he is a changed man after the stroke. Its uncommon, but it happens. Brain damage can result in personality shifts.

He's some Pennsylvania Politician, I forget his name but maybe a Senator.

Anyone who possesses the kind of money that they possess, even Yang, are only in it for themselves and their cronies.

Well yes. But that's traditional American Politics and its been like that for a long time. People prefer the devil they know (money / greed) rather than other vices.

If anything, being openly greedy makes people more comfortable with the personality.

[–] GreenMartian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

that one dude who wore the hoodie and had the stroke and then turned out to be fucking insane

I hate this timeline. Living across the Pacific, I actually know about Fetterman.

An Australian shouldn't know the names of so many American politicians. But it's hard when y'all are trying to out-crazy each other every second day.

I couldn't even name our current speaker of the house, yet I can identify Mike Johnson whenever his mug shows up in the news. This is truly the dumbest timeline.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)

If it puts the hyper racist conservatives against the conservatives who tolerate the hyper racist conservatives I'm all for it.

[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

I just want to see him actually keep his word and keep Republicans who voted for the big bill from getting reelected.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

American Nazi Party. Now that somehow brings up a New Order to the political game, doesn't it?

[–] Whirling_Cloudburst@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Shouldn't it be the Africa party tho?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MyOpinion@lemmy.today 9 points 23 hours ago

Divide the Trump base! Yes!

[–] tal@lemmy.today 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

“It is obvious with the insane spending of this bill, which increases the debt ceiling by a record FIVE TRILLION DOLLARS that we live in a one-party country – the PORKY PIG PARTY!!” Musk said Monday. 

If you just want a small-government party, there's already the Libertarian Party.

https://lp.org/platform-page/

2.4 Government Finance and Spending

Since all persons are entitled to keep the fruits of their labor, we oppose all government activity that consists of the forcible collection of money or goods from individuals in violation of their individual rights and strive for the eventual repeal of all taxation. To further that end, we call for the repeal of the income tax, the abolishment of the Internal Revenue Service and all federal programs and services not required under the U.S. Constitution. We oppose forcing employers to serve as tax collectors. We support any initiative to reduce or abolish any tax, and oppose any increase on any tax for any reason. To the extent possible, we advocate that all public services be funded or allowed to be provided in a voluntary manner.

2.5 Government Debt

Government should not incur debt, which burdens future generations without their consent. We support the passage of a “Balanced Budget Amendment” to the U.S. Constitution, provided that the budget is balanced exclusively by cutting expenditures, and not by raising taxes.

Don't think they'd be onboard with your anti-trans thing, though.

1.4 Personal Relationships

Sexual orientation, preference, gender, or gender identity should have no impact on the government’s treatment of individuals, such as in current marriage, child custody, adoption, immigration, or military service laws. Government does not have the authority to define, promote, license, or restrict personal relationships, regardless of the number of participants. Consenting adults should be free to choose their own sexual practices and personal relationships. Until such time as the government stops its illegitimate practice of marriage licensing, such licenses must be granted to all consenting adults who apply.

give them a minute. The LP has been swinging right to try and court embarrassed republicans. I know this because I aligned with them enough to vote Jorgensen in 20.

[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

LP went full-on Trump on the last elections though. Also, they're pro-Russia but then again so is probably America Party.

[–] VegasVator@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

"I DECLARE A NEW PARTY".

I just started a new party too.

[–] Xande@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 20 hours ago

When did they forget he is an immigrant too?

Oh, wait... he's an insanely rich white immigrant... nevermind.

[–] ABetterTomorrow@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And there it is, the name/term “American” is forever negative.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

Does this mean he doesn't need political donations?

[–] pawnfuture@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Musk caused a lot of problems mainly while he was being self serving. He fired a lot of FAA leadership and mass laid off air traffic controllers. He wanted to steal a contract from Verizon for SpaceX. Aircraft incidents increased almost immediately. DOGE also led cuts at NOAA which NWS relies on. There was a surprise tornado in the midwest a couple of months ago and flash flood in Texas. These events claimed lives. I blame Musk. Musk is at least partially responsible for Trump gaining power whether he hacked vote tabulations or not.

There could not be a worse bad actor to be involved in our politics. I like the idea of a centrist party but want Musk to not be involved at all.

[–] brendansimms@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Musk and Centrist Party cannot be used in the same sentence. Dude is a nazi.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 3 points 13 hours ago

If this works, it's game over for the Republican Party.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

The rent is too damn high!

load more comments
view more: next ›