this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2025
386 points (94.7% liked)

politics

24588 readers
2678 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Welp...

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 164 points 1 day ago (4 children)

"America Party"

Americans really are the ultimate parody of themselves. Have fun with your civil war.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 102 points 1 day ago

The "America Party", started by a Nazi African. What a wild thing.

[–] Hubi@feddit.org 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not just the USA or even just North America. It's apparently a party for South America as well!

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 18 points 1 day ago

Tbf assuming South America is just kinda ours to mess with or else just forgetting about it is a pretty common thing for the US to do, it tracks

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zerlyna@lemmy.world 101 points 1 day ago (13 children)

I’m not sure if I want this to fail or succeed.

[–] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 138 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Hopefully it has success at breaking us from our failed two party system, while at the same time the party itself fails (and costs him lot of money in the process).

[–] ExFed@programming.dev 71 points 1 day ago (8 children)

We'll need ranked choice (or some other voting scheme other than First Past The Post). Otherwise it'll just end up the same as it always has.

[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago

Need new rules in House and Senate, too. The majority party gets majority in all the committees, gets to pick all the committee chairs, etc. All of the current non-D/non-R members 'caucus' with one of the major parties, making them de facto members of that party. A third party with enough representation to block the other two from gaining majority would almost certainly end up in an alliance with one, leaving us back with functional two-party politics.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 28 points 1 day ago

Breaking the US from the failed 2-party system would require replacing first-past-the-post voting with at least ranked choice, if not a proportional system like Hare-Clarke, and probably scrapping the Electoral College altogether. Which may require constitutional amendments, or at least a partisan Supreme Court sympathetic to more democracy that would Chewbacca-defence it through regardless of legality.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] tunetardis@lemmy.ca 57 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Best case scenario is it will split the right wing vote. In Canada, we're used to it going the other way with conservatives taking advantage of a split left.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Washington Post columnists said it would probably just capture the "Never Trumper" moderate Republican voters who currently begrudgingly vote Democratic because they understand that the Republican Party is nominating only yes-men and fascists.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 40 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Washington Post isn't exactly a beacon of truth and justice.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] makyo@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

The Dems leaned hard on the never Trumpers for votes last year and you can see where that got them. Elon can have them.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

Republican never Trumper that doesn't vote GOP is likely vanishingly small. They all fall in line.

It might siphon off the GOP voters that begrudingly fell in line because they bought the Communist Kamala or something, or the ones that needed to see Trump disaster a second time.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dalekcaan@feddit.nl 24 points 1 day ago

I want him to split the GOP vote. Basically just a Jill Stein that believes his own swill.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Yeah...

At best, it splits the MAGAt vote, making Dems a clear winner.

At worst, it takes some GenZ dipshit votes away from Dems and causes chaos.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] nuko147@lemmy.world 71 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The America Party run by a South African.

Popcorn is not enough for this country.

[–] sprite0@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

of all the things to shit on him for this isn't it. being multi cultural is the only culture we have and almost all of us are immigrants.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] infyrian@kbin.melroy.org 65 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Oh he didn't want to throw an X somewhere in that name like it is in almost everything he touches?

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 38 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] turtlesareneat@discuss.online 17 points 1 day ago

American Party X

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] rational_lib@lemmy.world 57 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I'll just point out the risk of what I'll call "Joe Roganing" here. Elon pretends he hates both parties while there's no election coming up. Then when the election arrives he "makes up his mind" and endorses Republicans. This allows him to 1) attract people fed up with both parties just to hand them to Republicans, and 2) have a credible that that forces Republicans to do his bidding.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] buttnugget@lemmy.world 54 points 22 hours ago (8 children)

The funniest thing about stuff like this is that there are already a hundred political parties in the US. Every time someone says “we need a third party,” it reminds me of that xkcd comic about standards and protocols.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago (4 children)

What kind of shitty click bait is this?

The richest man in the world officially announced on Saturday that he has officially formed a new political party to challenge Republicans and Democrats alike.

He fucking tweeted that it was created, literally nothing official.

[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (3 children)

And when the president tweets it's for some reason official and should be followed... We live in a really stupid age where the government and politics in the US is governed by social media.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 42 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

are they hiring? i have many expensive ideas with zero guarantees of success

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 40 points 23 hours ago (8 children)

Honestly, I am tentatively very excited about this. Not because I support that nazi in any way whatsoever. I am excited because he stands to be a significant spoiler for the GOPs elections.

[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 23 points 20 hours ago

He will pull a Joe Rogan and endorse Trump last minute.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 40 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

How many weeks before he gets bored and abandons it when things don’t immediately work, just like everything else in his useless life?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 31 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

I hope this would split the vote among magas and republicans and the dems would be a shoe in. Sadly, I've lost a lot of faith in the dems and their ability to effectively fight for the people. Maybe we need even more parties?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 31 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

I fail to see how splitting up the fascists is anything but a good thing. Let them fight.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 29 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm surprised he didn't try to meme it up and call it the Lemon Party.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 25 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

The entire Democrat demographic hates him for kissing Trumps ass.

The entire Trump demogaphic hates him for going against Trump.

And the Republican demographic have never liked him as far as I'm aware.

So.... who are his voters? Probably just a convenient way to shuffle money around.

[–] Samskara@sh.itjust.works 17 points 18 hours ago

This isn’t about money. It’s about Elon Musk‘s ego and will to power.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 13 hours ago

He's completely unable to read the room. Understandable really, he doesn't exist in the same world as the rest of us really.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] markstos@lemmy.world 25 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I’m sure Tesla shareholders are happy to hear he’s picked up another side project.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mazzilius_marsti@lemmy.world 24 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

A white South African dude created the American Party

ffs did somebody step on a bug in 2015 and change the whole timeline?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 23 points 5 hours ago

Has he filed any paperwork? Gathered any signatures?

Didn't think so. It's just typical Elmo Skum: hurricane force hot air scented with billionaire quantities of bovine effluvia.

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 day ago (9 children)

While on one hand I hope that people realize this is literally their government being purchased by a single rich guy and push back... I know they're far too stupid for that.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] ghostlychonk@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (4 children)

He can fuck right off. I don't believe him and Trump are actually at odds and I think this is an attempt to create an opposition party that's even more under conservative control than the Democrats are.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] huppakee@feddit.nl 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm really happy about this, always thought 1 flavour of fascism wasn't enough for me /s

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jaupsinluggies@feddit.uk 18 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Oh, can "aliens" start political parties in the USA?

Imma start a "British Colony" party over there; anyone want to join me? MAABCA.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zier@fedia.io 17 points 1 day ago

Hey you guyz, now there is another billionaire you can donate your money to and he will do nothing for you. Cool!

[–] Guidy@lemmy.world 17 points 22 hours ago

Just in: Elon Musk can fuck off. Preferably to Mars, permanently.

Fuck him and his political party.

[–] Sho@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

....but the nazi party already existed.

load more comments
view more: next ›