this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2025
160 points (95.5% liked)

politics

24588 readers
3249 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

According to a new poll, 57% of male Republicans say they are likely to support Elon Musk's "America Party"

Almost half of voters said they are likely to support a new political party proposed by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, according to fresh polling.

A Quantus Insights survey released Wednesday found that 40% of voters said they would be likely to back Musk's "America Party," which aims to serve voters disillusioned with both Republicans and Democrats. Musk shared the poll's results on X, calling the results "Encouraging."

Musk first pitched a new political party in early June after he clashed with Donald Trump over the GOP's multi-trillion-dollar tax and spending bill.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PoopSpiderman@lemmy.world 85 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I definitely would not support any party created by that fuckhead. It will just be another douchebag conservative shitshow.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 57 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Neither would I. But! It would split the conservative vote and also force the Democrats to listen to the voters! If it ended "first past the post" voting, it would be incredibly good for this country and the world...

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Or, Democrats do what they do best -- not listen to their voters -- and the new party comes to power by merging the Nationalists that are in Musk's camp with the Socialists that the Democrats always ignore. Maybe they'll even merge those two names together to describe the new party....

[–] Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago

I'd like to remain more hopeful in that the first past the post standard collapses and that means we socialists get to do democrats 2.0 in the same way musk wants Republicans 2.0

[–] EmptySlime@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 1 day ago

Cynically that means that the spoiler effect might actually work in our favor if he does go through with it. I'm not gonna hold my breath for it, but it would be so funny if Musk's ego actually leads to the Republican party splitting and losing because they can't decide how many poor people and minorities they want to throw into a wood chipper.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 80 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (3 children)

40% of Americans would support a party founded by the world's richest man whose very first instinct when Trump won was to triumphantly perform two Nazi salutes. WTF, USA?

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 49 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm actually very much in favor of Musk starting a political party that effectively splits the Republican vote and makes Democrat victories that much easier. Go Musk!

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 13 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (4 children)

It looks like it would split the Democratic vote too. Which suggests a lot of Democratic voters (like pretty much all Republican voters) don't have the first clue what's going on.

[–] AugustWest@lemmy.world 10 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

That could be a great thing. If Musk launched a party with large enough base support of clueless morons to destabilize both Rep and Dem parties, that would create space for the creation of a liberal/left party, and suddenly we have escaped the crushing gravity of the two-party system.

That said, I doubt Musks party would have even a fraction of the support that is suggested.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

If Musk launched a party with large enough base support of clueless morons to destabilize both Rep and Dem parties, that would create space for the creation of a liberal/left party,

Actually, a new party that successfully pulls from both parties would most likely be centrist at best.

[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Centrist, so… left of the democrats?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 6 points 23 hours ago

That's context we don't actually have.

It's possible that Democrats are simply clueless as you suggest, but we don't know how many people supported this not because they intend to join Musk's third party, but because they also know that it'll split the GOP vote and make Democrat victories easier.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Xanis@lemmy.world 8 points 23 hours ago

Yup! Let them fight.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 10 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Have you met trump voters?

They idolized trump because they believed he was wealthy

But musk is actually as wealthy as they believed Trump was.

Nothing else matters to them, wealth = power, and power is a good thing to ally with.

It's all basic psychology, because when you spend literal generations ignoring public education, around 40% of the population never gets past base animalistic thinking.

They're picking the aide they think is most powerful, because millions of years of instincts beat into us by evolution says the powerful will kill the weak. Learning the killing doesn't have to happen is the entire point of socialization, and we just don't teach that to humans anymore.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 5 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Learning the killing doesn’t have to happen is the entire point of socialization, and we just don’t teach that to humans anymore.

We don't teach it to Americans any more. Some places still understand what society and social responsibility are. But Americans have been subjected to the propaganda of toxic individualism for too long.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

toxic individualism

That's not the root problem. It's the lie told to defend ruthless capitalism:

If you can't make it, you're the problem

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 19 hours ago

Yes, thats the 'independent voter' cohort the Dems have spent 20+ years making concessions to.

They also grew this cohort by being very largely ineffectual, and allowing education, wealth gap, general quality of life... to all get much worse, such that more people are now more stupid, angry and exhausted.

[–] vegeta@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (2 children)

New party is fine. New Musk party is a hard no. I'm suprised he didn't call it the X party, 420 party, or Gigaparty

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] bran_buckler@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago

Or the Life of the Party, the After Party, or the Block Party.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 5 points 23 hours ago

It's the absolute perfect time for Republicans to split...

This is gonna be the first fair Dem primary in decades that will be a fair fight. Musk and Trump having a slap fight while Dems can actually get the most popular candidate into the general?

Let em cook

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 31 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

Ok, call me crazy, but hear me out: this is good and we should encourage it.

One fascist party gets all the fascists aligned. Multiple fascist parties split them up. Suddenly their 51% majority is 25% and 26%. We should be fostering the infighting and splitting of the party. We should welcome its own destruction from within.

I'll only believe it when I see it, but this could theoretically be the beginning of the end for a two party system. If done right we could end up with 4 or 5 legitimate parties (including splitting Democrats up and getting a true labor party)

[–] forrgott@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Never gonna have more than two parties as long as we still use "first past the post" voting.

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 8 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

A new "Republican" party would necessarily have to argue for vote reform in order to make gains. We might be able to spin this into a bipartisan issue. We make it their own self interest to introduce ranked choice voting.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I agree. But we need more than just Musk. Like 4 or 5. Break the system.

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 7 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

I'm hoping the Dems split into a proper labor party as well

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Alaik@lemmy.zip 3 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

There's 0 way a labor party would take root here with how much of our population falls for moneyed propaganda. Still, more choices is always better when it comes to these political parties.

[–] htrayl@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago

I am not so sure - i think that many many young folk are both more open to it and are disenchanted with the democrat party - and this will continue to grow with the old guard insisting on shooting themselves in the foot by stubbornly resisting Mamdani in new york immediatelt after 3 "Vote Blue No Matter Who" campaigns for the in the last few presidential elections.

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

You act as if unions are non-existent and Bernie Sanders has no following.... Unlikely? Sure. But impossible? Nope. Literally half the Dem talk since the election has been about how much Dems feel disenfranchised by their own party. Have you been paying any attention?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] JakenVeina@midwest.social 21 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (3 children)

Almost half of voters said they are likely to support a new political party proposed by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, according to fresh polling.

Horseshit. No way is Elon's popularity that high, after he so effectively alienated himself from both US parties. I'm guessing the poll just asked about supporting A third party, not Elon's third party.

[–] 3abas@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago

Both parties suck and are ruining the country. Here's an idea, let's take the jackass that jumped around with a chainsaw and sawed away people's benefits before giving two Seig Heils at the worse of the two horrible parties, let's go with his new party.

What a joke.

[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 4 points 13 hours ago

It's not his popularity.

  1. Republicans dont really like Trump, they just want to "own the libs", so a new "conservative" party appeals to them.
  2. Democrats won't vote for the new party, but realize that it will destroy the Republican party.
[–] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 hours ago

Asking people a theoretical question about whether they would support a third party doesn't give you any useful information. It doesn't mean they'll support whatever you make, nor does it mean you (in this case Musk) have what it takes to build a party from scratch. Including just basic human qualities required, ike patience and perseverance.

This whole story isn't even worth following.

[–] DickFiasco@sh.itjust.works 19 points 23 hours ago

We've had one fascist party, yes. But what about second fascist party?

[–] Zier@fedia.io 10 points 21 hours ago

Elon is a petulant child who knows nothing. That party will only attract people like him, which will be no different than the libertarian / tea party / republicans. This too will fail.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 9 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Let him be the Jill Stein of the conservatives.

Or a Ross Perot redux.

😈

[–] julysfire@lemmy.world 9 points 15 hours ago

For the love of fuck, billionaires do not have your best interests in mind.

[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 day ago

We already have a far-right fascist party and a right wing party. Why add another fascist party?

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 8 points 23 hours ago

more reality tv bullshit

musk is a fucking muppet

better than trump, who's also a muppet?

NO. it's muppets fighting muppets, like Team America: World Police, except irl

[–] TomMasz@piefed.social 8 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

"57% of male Republicans " says it all.

[–] renamon_silver@lemmy.wtf 5 points 20 hours ago

Ah yes, the entire population of America

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago

57% of male Republican voters. Uhh. Sounds good. Large enough to tear a painful bite out of the GOP, but not enough to matter.

And I hope that by now, Democrats know enough not to vote for him.

[–] 800XL@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Fuck Elon Musk. Fuck Elon Musk's Doge party with stolen info from the US Gov't about taxpayers. He just wants to pull an RFK for the 2028 elections and I guarantee a new exec order will come forth giving Trump some bullshit advantage that plays right off this because it's the plan all along.

Fuck Elon Musk

[–] madlian@lemmy.cafe 4 points 8 hours ago

2028 election haha

[–] yarr@feddit.nl 5 points 1 day ago

Elon has alienated so many people it's not clear he would be able to form a consortium of voters big enough to matter.

To break the two-party system we have in the USA, you'd need to have overwhelming numbers, because both the Democrats and GOP have a vested interest in maintaining the status quo regarding the balance of power.

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago

Split the Democrats at the same time for a proper anti-establishment levelling of the playing field, then start talking in ways that highlight progressive values.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

This is stupid

[–] selkiesidhe@sh.itjust.works 2 points 19 hours ago

I support your sorry ass getting deported to south sudan. Not from south sudan? IDC.

Muskrat is all talk. The fucker got drumpf elected. I do not care if they've had a falling out. He talks and talks about releasing Epstein info then does nothing.

🖕🤬🖕

load more comments
view more: next ›