this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2025
330 points (100.0% liked)

World News

48361 readers
2394 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For the first time in over a century, Parisians and tourists will be able to take a refreshing dip in the River Seine. The long-polluted waterway is finally opening up as a summertime swim spot following a 1.4 billion euro ($1.5 billion) cleanup project that made it suitable for Olympic competitions last year.

Three new swimming sites on the Paris riverbank will open on Saturday — one close to Paris’ Notre Dame Cathedral, another near the Eiffel Tower and a third in eastern Paris.

Swimming in the Seine has been illegal since 1923, with a few exceptions, due to pollution and risks posed by river navigation. Taking a dip outside bathing areas is still banned for safety reasons.

top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] oce@jlai.lu 85 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It's controlled every day and closed if there's any danger, for example after heavy rains bringing more pollution than usual. They have started finding different forms of life that only happen in very clean waters, it's pretty cool. One of the few positive ecological news lately.

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Still wouldn't trust it.

It's been a poop river for hundreds of years and they haven't separated out sewer from storm water yet.

[–] oce@jlai.lu 28 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think it's mediagenic enough that journalists and other organizations probably tried to do their own tests and found nothing suspicious that wasn't officially announced.

By the Olympic Games 2024, the work to improve the infrastructure to prevent pollution already costed 1.4 billions of euros. I guess additional infrastructure for exceptional meteorological events was just too much to be justified.

If the water is tested every day of the opened swimming season, there's no reason to worry.

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That it won't immediately kill you doesn't mean it's good for you.

[–] oce@jlai.lu 6 points 1 week ago

Do you avoid every kind of nature swimming? What if the tests say that it is as clean as the river or sea you trusted to swim before?

[–] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's been in the work for quite a while. The mayor of Paris announced that the seine will be open for swimming in 5 years ... In 1988.

So it took a bit longer than planned, almost 50 years instead of 5 but the fact that they are opening it now is the result of these 50 years of continuous improvement.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

1988 wasn't almost 50 years ag... Shit.

[–] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wait, I messed up. It's almost 40 years ago, not 50

[–] Tja@programming.dev 3 points 1 week ago

Closer to 50 than to 5, that's for sure.

[–] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 26 points 1 week ago

And this is why while while everyone was bitching about how much money this will cost i was just thinking about how nice it will be when you can finally swim in it again. Of course there is a lot of long term infrastructure that needs to be built so big rains dont flush all the shit into it but still good news. It was also smart of the mayor to do this "for" the olympics.

[–] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 week ago
[–] rabber@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

No thanks I'll stick to my local secret lake that nobody shits in

[–] shiroininja@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Jokes on you, I’m already there, shitting.

[–] lemmylump@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Move over I was shitting here first.

[–] shiroininja@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] lemmylump@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Why not, let's show that turd who's boss.

[–] rabber@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago

OK I'm on my way to literally murder you so you have ten minutes to clean up or else

[–] Steve@startrek.website 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] rabber@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago
[–] LordWiggle@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Friends with a pool had a sign saying "don't pee in our pool, we don't swim in your toilet". In Paris however...

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I assume embarrassment on the world stage helped move this along given the Olympics?

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

Who knew anything good could result from the Olympics

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Really hilariously stupid that it took a goddamn sporting event for them to even try to clean up this river

[–] PontingClarke@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Great to see the Seine finally reopened for swimming after a century! A €1.4B investment in clean water and public access is a win for both the environment and city life. Hope other major cities follow Paris’s lead.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world -3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Reason #4,538 why I'll never live in or near a large city.

[–] JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You won't live near cities that clean up their waterways? You could rival Michelin publishing that list of reasons you have.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

My local waterways aren't so fucking filthy that swimming has been banned for a century. We spent the 4th happily boating (electric!), swimming, fucking around on the local river, no thoughts of foul water.

[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There is always a big city upstream

[–] SheeEttin@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago

Or a farm with fertilizer runoff. Or rural industrial site, like oilfield, mine, chemical plant...