Stop warning, start consequenting.
this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
70 points (96.1% liked)
politics
22004 readers
4307 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I know, right? Just skip straight to the point.
Much to late for that.
Anyone wanna guess what those "Consequences" are going to be?
- A sternly worded written order DEMANDING compliance, with random words in ALL CAPS to show how serious they are this time.
- A repeat of the orders demanding compliance, but adding the words "OR ELSE" to the end.
- A $1000 fine for the first dozen or so violations, followed by nothing at all.
- A contempt of court charge for Trump that actually can't be enforced because he's the sitting President.
- A press release saying that Trump needs to abide by the court's decisions.
- Absolutely fucking nothing at all.
Last I checked he can’t be charged with anything as sitting President, not that it can’t be enforced. The SC said that as long as he’s acting in the official capacity of President, and they’re the only ones that can define that on a case by case basis, then it’s official and legal. It’ll be his subordinates that’ll be charged.
Edit: even my grasp of the situation here seems flimsy to me, so someone more dialed in or informed feel free to re-educate me on the subject.
Theoretically, you can still sue the office of the President, just not Trump himself.
So, you know. You can cost the taxpayers money, but not the person making the terrible costly decisions
Last I checked he can’t be charged with anything as sitting President, not that it can’t be enforced.
Whichever way it works. The end result is the same.
If the justice system worked the same way for everyone as it did for trump, it would be no different than not existing at all.
If the judiciary didn't exist at all, you know there would be some vigilante justice being meted out on a regular basis.
Just saying.
There's already been a couple attempts on his life, so your theory holds ground.
No attempt that should be taken seriously.
Be the change you wish to see in the world.
Consequences? I don't know the meaning of the word.
-Trump probably
How much could a consequence be? 10 dollars?
-Trump probably
They already did. Why is there all these warnings and super warnings and ultimatums. Because there are separate laws for us and them.
lol ok
let it play out. so far the judiciary has been the only administrative bulwark. we will know so much more very shortly and that will dictate what hand is forced next.
Hopefully, they start chipping away at his staff and administration. But who am I kidding.
Haha, consequences?
Finally, trump is really gonna get a stern talking to this time!
lol no there won't be
Ooooooh...another warning...that'll show em.