Mildly Interesting

21542 readers

628 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

marcar@lemmy.world

WhatsHerBucket@lemmy.world

178

The richest 100 donors make up 18% and 53% of US Political Party funds. Their influence has increased significantly since 2008. (lemmy.world)

submitted 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) by Davriellelouna@lemmy.world to c/mildlyinteresting@lemmy.world

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 7 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 11 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (3 children)

Kind of wild that Elon donated $250M alone didn't even change the trend.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago

What do you mean, taking that this graph is showing data every to year it doubled gop percentage between elections and the 2022-2024 holds a hugely significant portion of that increase.

[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

It went from 30 to 50%?

[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 0 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Its still been growing at a huge rate before that

[–] Sabin10@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

The growth between 2008 and 2022 was the same as the growth between 2022 and 2024.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 0 points 13 hours ago

I'm not sure it counts. Would that be a donation to a political party fund?

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 10 points 12 hours ago

"Mildly interesting" or "greatly depressing"?