this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2025
225 points (99.1% liked)

politics

24567 readers
2779 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Trump administration has put on hold $6.8 billion in federal funds for K-12 schools, according to an Education Department notice obtained by States Newsroom. [...] The agency informed states on Monday that it would be withholding funding for several programs, including before- and after-school programs, migrant education and English-language learning, among other initiatives.

top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 51 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Says people should learn to speak English in America, cuts funding for English learning.

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

They want them already speaking it before they get here. They don’t want to spend the money to educate people outside of the bare minimum of what’s required to make Amerikkka run.

One of my classes I am currently taking for my grad program to get my master’s in elementary education will probably be discussing this.

[–] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What do you mean "get here"? He hates immigrants.

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I would argue that one can still hate immigrants and also realize that they bring value. Doesn’t Trump employ immigrants at Mar A Lago? They want some here, but they would prefer they speak English because they refuse to learn any other languages. You save money not printing songs in other languages or hiring interpreters, etc.

They would be happy to educate immigrants just enough to ingrain them into our system for labor, but it’s easier if they speak English because it’s quicker education and less money.

Trump would bring back slavery if he could. He doesn't give a shit about immigrants, only profit. He only hires immigrants because he can pay them less.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 38 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Time for states to freeze payments to the Trump administration. He'll only grift them into his own pockets anyway. They can just fund their education programs directly.

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't fucking care how hard it is logistically to do this, all blue states need to execute on withholding payments yesterday.

I myself have slashed my federal tax payments by ~75% for 2 years now and they can come get that money when I'm dead.

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

How are you withholding that much without wage garnishment happening?

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Underpay one year, get on a super cheap repayment plan (say, $100/mo).

Then keep underpaying and they just tack it on to the balance but your payment stays the same.

My friend has been doing it for 8+ years now and has racked up six figures+. I've only been doing it for 3ish.

I don't actually advise this as I'm not a lawyer or an accountant and it could go very badly.

If garnishment does happen, one possible advantage is that most of my jobs are 1099 contract nowadays so maybe I could skirt that? I honestly don't know. I don't care right now, in roughly a year I plan to leave the US and never return.

[–] atticus88th@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

roughly a year I plan to leave the US and never return.

And roughly what 3rd world country without U.S. Extradition for tax fraud are you planning to go to?

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago

Never said I wasn't going to pay it, just not paying it quickly.

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 30 points 2 days ago

Who CARES? I don't have to use PRONOUNS when I talk to my Neighbor's 3 YEAR OLD DAUGHTER NOW!

-Literally EVERY SINGLE REPUBLICAN!

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Trump wants us stupid, sick, and easily distracted.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

...the conservative project for decades.

[–] j0ester@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

That’s why Donald loves the poorly uneducated.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Besides the hope that brown and black people would also be harmed, I wonder how the typical conservative voter thinks this kind of thing is going to help them?

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I wonder how the typical conservative voter thinks this kind of thing is going to help them?

Many are older without children in schools anymore and are happy they are not "paying to teach other people's kids" even though they themselves were the recipients of older Americans paying for them to go through public schools. Others are rich paying to send their kids to private schools or rich enough to pay to send them to religious school so they too are happy to not fund public schools. The last group are poor conservatives that can't afford private schools and have children in public schools. This group are "temporarily embarrassed millionaires" that aren't bothered because they'll be sending their kids to private schools "real soon now". They are just happen to be invited to the meetings tearing down society and the safety nets that sustain them everyday.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I wonder how the typical conservative voter thinks this kind of thing is going to help them?

They're stupid.

That's how.

They're stupid because their regional educational system failed them. And that's why they don't have the intelligence to understand why underfunding education is a bad thing.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

They want the churches to run the schools.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Cletus don't care about no damn book lernin. All Cletus need is Bible.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago

....which Cletus won't read either.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Gotta keep 'em stupid so they can be conservatives when they grow up.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 1 points 23 hours ago

"I love the poorly educated"- Trump, 2016

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

Just send your kids to private school like a normal American -DJ Trump

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

We've seen the exact same playbook with universities. Pull federal funding for racist political priorities, and other funding if they don't start toeing the line.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 6 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

"I love the poorly educated"- Trump, 2016

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 5 points 23 hours ago

Republicans have nothing but contempt for the poorly educated. And they're creating more of them, because Conservatism depends on ignorant people.

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago

Send those poor and middle class kids to work, as Jesus intended.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

I think it's time to sell everything and gtfo.

[–] bieren@lemmy.zip 1 points 13 hours ago

“Winning1111!1!111! American! Fuck yeah! Fuck the kids!111!1!” -MAGAcucks