this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2025
501 points (99.6% liked)

World News

48103 readers
2194 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] splonglo@lemmy.world 55 points 2 days ago (4 children)

They can move out of the country but they cannot move out of the world. An international wealth tax CAN be done, the only obstacle is mere political will.

And it must be said, the ability for the rich to take their assets and leave has been greatly over-stated, since much of it is in the form of land.

Extreme wealth must be taxxed, or we will all live in desperate poverty.

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

Exactly. Humanity will not survive like this. I have no problem with somebody building a successful business and making a few millions, but excessive wealth hording needs to stop. These people are holding essential resources of our planet hostage, while billions suffer.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 9 points 2 days ago

They can't also move the assets that makes them rich. What's Amazon going to do? Close business in Spain to avoid the taxes??

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

the only obstacle is mere political will.

That's a pretty fucking big obstacle. This can only be done if all countries agree to it so with the growing number of countries taken over by right wing governments it's basically impossible. Even the Spanish government that proposed this has its days counted. This is a nice PR move, not a realistic proposal.

[–] splonglo@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Every major political event in history was once an unrealistic proposal. Whether it can happen next week or not has absolutely no bearing on the fact that it must be done.

Reach out to your local political rep and tell them you support a wealth tax. Reach out to your local boomer FB page and tell them you support a wealth tax. Make the case. If public opinion and political opinion isn't there then there is work to do. Put away minor nit picks and technical problems, they absolutely do not matter in the grand scheme of things. Build the momentum, tax the damn rich.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Whether it can happen next week or not has absolutely no bearing on the fact that it must be done.

The fact that it must be done does not mean that it will be done. Of course you can hope that in some not-so-distant future we'll get there (I sure hope so) but as of now US, Russia, Middle East and parts of EU will not only not support it but will actively fight against it. Calling local reps and posting on FB will not change that. It's not a technical problem, it's reality. It's fine to express your support for the idea but it's also fine to be realistic about its chances.

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 days ago

While I despise the current Spanish government for being interested only in being in power (progressive here. They just lack a moral compass), if this comes to fruition it will be hard for conservatives to roll back. It would expose how tight a leash the oligarchs have on them.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

Can you explain the significance of your xx in taxxed?

[–] Pudutr0n@feddit.cl 40 points 3 days ago

Rich and Super rich politicians claim to plan taxing the super super rich that pay for their campaigns, NGOs, and the media that gets them elected, attempting to capitalize off the Zeitgeist.

Excuse me if I don't hold my breath.

[–] NotSteve_@piefed.ca 32 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I really like the “grotesquely” descriptor. It fits a lot better than just “ultra wealthy” which doesn’t have the negative connotation it should

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago

Agreed! I plan on using "the grotesquely wealthy" from now on, it conveys my visceral opinion of them.

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

he looks like one of those banker goblins from harry potter wearing a human disguise

Those banker goblins were a bit of a jew face.

Bezos just looks like terrible rich person.

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 5 points 2 days ago

Isn’t Spain’s left-wing government on the ropes with a corruption scandal, and likely to be replaced by a hard-right government soon?