this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2025
37 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22355 readers
3533 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] el_muerte@lemm.ee 13 points 1 week ago

[Trump wrote] “The necessary Pardoning Documents were not explained to, or approved by, Biden.”

"Not explained to."

Dipshit is really telling on himself here that actually reading an EO didn't even occur to him, he relies on others to dumb them down for him.

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

By his logic, we could treat Trump's pardons as 'void and vacant' as well.

[–] aseriesoftubes@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What, are you suggesting that our virile Supreme Leader, renowned for his stamina and attention span, didn’t sign all 1,600 J6 pardons by hand?

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 3 points 1 week ago

I believe our strong, virile leader spent all their waking hours signing those 3,300 J6 pardons while big, strong men stood their with tears rolling down their cheeks.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

His aren't signed by a pen at all and could easily be fraudulent because of it. Think about it, an 8bit graphic is much easier to copy than 32bit.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

This isn't a country of law and order anymore. Laws only apply when Trump wants them to apply. There is no logic beyond that.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago

Laws have only ever applied when someone is willing and able to enforce them.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago

after autopen controversy

There go the media again implicitly giving credence to Trump's nonsense. There was no "autopen controversy" except Trump making this groundless assertion. They make it sound like he's responding to a real controversy.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Ridiculous. A man who breaks laws and violates the constitution daily calling out his predecessor for using the wrong kind of pen while attempting to protect people from persecution. If there were a functioning justice system this would be dismissed out of hand.

[–] Australis13@fedia.io 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My concern here is whether anyone is actually going to stand up to him. He's clearly flagging that he's going to go after these people and it's going to be dependent on whether the DOJ actually pushes back or not.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

it’s going to be dependent on whether the DOJ actually pushes back or not.

Lmao.

As if that's even a question. He picked who he picked for exactly this kind of thing. There will be no pushback.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Good news is, Pam Bondi is dirt cheap. It only takes $25k for her to drop investigations!

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Expecting the courts to save US democracy? How's that been working so far?

[–] mercano@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sounds like a sovereign citizen “where’s the wet ink signature?” kind of complaint.

[–] evenglow@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

It's not a complaint. It's a pretense and excuse to persecute people he doesn't like.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I hate when articles like this use words like controversy. There is no controversy when someone just makes up that a standard thing is now an issue.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 3 points 1 week ago

That's the Fox model. Have your talking head invent visit on the morning program, have them debate it on the afternoon program, then have the evening program report on the controversy.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

ha, says the guy who wants to make things declassified by his thoughts alone.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 2 points 1 week ago

Well, he's not in prison for treason or anything related to classified documents being mishandled, soooooooo.......

Rule of law means nothing in the US anymore unless you're poor. If it mattered, we would have had different presidential candidates from the start.

If anyone still cares in the government, none of them care enough to actually do anything but stand by and watch. Maybe give a half-hearted "yeah way to take a stand" after the fact when someone gets dragged out of the room by the fascists.

Excellent domain name for your instance, by the way. Absolutely horrifying in just the right way.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Man I am getting so tired of saying “I fucking told you so” to so many people.

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Must feel good to be morally superiors to everyone. I bet it’ll feel good too knowing you were right when the gestapo come and take you and your family away. But hey, you sure told em! /s

Stop with the “high ground” bullshit and get out there and actively do something about it.

Fuck off dude. I’ve been going to protests for this shit for a fucking decade, and trying to inform friends and family on the nuance of this shit for about the same length of time. My sister is married to a dark-skinned Indian dude; my niece is mixed-race. I have literal skin in the game when the white supremacists come looking for undesirables.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 0 points 1 week ago

Like?

Jumping up and down screaming at a building with a sign does absolutely nothing.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

HitlerPig is "void and vacant."

[–] podperson@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If this sticks, then maybe the next democrat in office can reverse all of the Jan 6 pardons?

[–] Ferrous@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

That is wishful thinking. The democrats have never responded in kind to republicans breaking precedent. If there's any lesson to be learned from the 2024 election, it is that democrats hold "precedent", "decorum", and "mature pragmatism" to be more important than winning (or quelling fascism).

It's the same wishful thinking as people who were saying "Biden could use the new presidential inmunity SCOTUS ruling to legally assassinate trump!"

Understand that both democrats and republicans are driving us off a cliff.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)
[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If they want to disqualify for being mentally incompetent, then all of Trump's and at least half of Regan's terms are also void.

I also love that dipshit who still can't even admit that Biden won the election.

[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The irony of them calling Biden a "President Puppet" when we all know Trump is a poorly disguised Russian Puppet

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

And the vacation thing when Trump spent 1/3 of his first term on the golf course