this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2025
870 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

71897 readers
4418 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 5) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] carrylex@lemmy.world 2 points 35 minutes ago* (last edited 34 minutes ago)

Compared to the Fairphone 5 it has some improvements but also a few downsides:

Pro:

  • It's a bit smaller (~4mm) and lighter (~20g)
  • Slightly better camera (future tests will tell how much better)
  • 120 Hz display
  • More RAM and storage (although I feel that the previous 6GB/128GB option was also sufficient for most users)
  • WiFi 6E Tri-Band (however you will likely never need this speed)
  • Bluetooth 5.4
  • Slightly larger battery

Con:

  • Backpanel now requires a screwdriver
  • Display has less resolution/PPI
  • Performance of processor will likely be nearly identical to predecessor (however it's more efficient and modern)
  • Downgrade to USB 2
  • 600€

My conclusion: Overall the improvements are ok, however just releasing the Fairphone 5 with a newer SoC might have been the better/more cost effective choice. Sacrificing display resolution for 120 Hz feels also quite wrong. 600€ is very pricy for a phone like this. Cutting some premium features away like the 120 Hz display or a bit of RAM and storage (that you can extend anyway with an SD card) might have saved enough to get the launch price down to somewhere near 500€ which would make it accessible for a wider audience.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 2 points 1 day ago (12 children)

This looks pretty good. The main issue with Fairphone for me is the price. FP 5 is still about 2x as expensive as Pixel 8. I got my Pixel 8a on promotion for ~250 euros. FP 5 still costs over 500. I never paid more than 300 euros for a phone and I'm not planning to.

load more comments (12 replies)

Fairphone has really gone off the deep end. 6 phone models in what? less than 12 years? That's what they call dedication to sustainability? Really? They used to say the most sustainable phone is your old phone, assuming you can continue to use it. Yet - my Fairphone 1, still in good working order hardware-wise, I had to "scrap" because no more SW updates. When my FP2 hardware (charging port) eventually failed, they no longer sold the relevant spare parts.

What good are exchangeable parts, if they are removed from the shop around the time that a well-treated phone might need them?

[–] yournamehere@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] razen@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

They don't have Auto in Screen Refresh Rare but shouldn't it be there if they LTPO display?

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Good, I only want to pay for the parts that don't send my data to Google and their partners.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

So a "phone" without any ability to connect to mobile networks or to WiFi?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›