this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2025
1048 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

73850 readers
4787 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Ok but what about a headphone jack ?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] carrylex@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (14 children)

Compared to the Fairphone 5 it has some improvements but also a few downsides:

Pro:

  • It's a bit smaller (~4mm) and lighter (~20g)
  • Slightly better camera (future tests will tell how much better)
  • 120 Hz display
  • More RAM and storage (although I feel that the previous 6GB/128GB option was also sufficient for most users)
  • WiFi 6E Tri-Band (however you will likely never need this speed)
  • Bluetooth 5.4
  • Slightly larger battery

Con:

  • Backpanel now requires a screwdriver
  • Display has less resolution/PPI
  • Performance of processor will likely be nearly identical to predecessor (however it's more efficient and modern)
  • Downgrade to USB 2
  • 600€

My conclusion: Overall the improvements are ok, however just releasing the Fairphone 5 with a newer SoC might have been the better/more cost effective choice. Sacrificing display resolution for 120 Hz feels also quite wrong. 600€ is very pricy for a phone like this. Cutting some premium features away like the 120 Hz display or a bit of RAM and storage (that you can extend anyway with an SD card) might have saved enough to get the launch price down to somewhere near 500€ which would make it accessible for a wider audience.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] bvoigtlaender@feddit.org 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Was really hoping to see a Fairphone 6a. Similar to the Google Pixel Series. Just a cheap version of it. I really don't need 120Hz, OLED or "No Bezels" all i want is big battery and a headphone jack that is all.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Quibblekrust@thelemmy.club 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Redex68@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

A time of flight sensor for autofocus

[–] FG_3479@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

I love the idea but the price is too high for the chip given that this is designed to be a longevity phone. A chip like the 7s Gen 3 would make the phone sluggish after a couple of years with how unoptimised todays apps are.

The Gorilla Glass 7i and IP55 water resistance are also concerning given that budget Samsung, Xiaomi, etc phones beat this.

However having components of the phone being easily replacable is a great thing.

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yeah wow, the problem with the phone that tries to compete with unethical big business is that unethical big entity is cheaper. Who would have thought

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] rfr_Foglia@feddit.it 14 points 1 month ago

Fairphone is probably going to be my new phone when I upgrade.

[–] potentiallynotfelix@lemmy.fish 14 points 1 month ago

a few things i like:

  • moments is an interesting concept
  • it says you can toggle off gemini ai. this is good
  • display goes from 10-120hz for battery
  • ultrawide selfie camera
  • microsd card slot!
  • power button fingerprint scanner, way better than underscreen
[–] absquatulate@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

Is it me or did they get slightly more vague on their marketing materials, wrt the environmental impact ( at least compared to fp5 ) ?

Also the battery seems a bit harder to replace, as you now need a screwdriver. It does appear to be more flush, so it may be due to size constraints.

Edit: and there's "more" replaceable parts because the back is split in two. That split might prove better for durability tho, because pulling the back on their older phones felt like it would break every time.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] bonus_crab@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (3 children)

love fairphone but i cant go bacl from graphene os. its so nice not having google attacjed to everything.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Mrkawfee@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (8 children)

Can anyone recommend this? Is the camera any good?

[–] crank0271@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Good question. I was just reading the article about it on The Verge, which mentions:

On the back, you’ll find a 50MP main camera and a 13MP ultrawide camera, while the front has a 32MP hole-punch camera for selfies and video calls. That’s a significant step down from the Fairphone 5, which used 50MP sensors on all three of its cameras.

No mention of camera quality, though, as it's basically a press release post and not a hands-on or review. I wish this would be available in the US for a fair price.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] mormund@feddit.org 11 points 1 month ago (4 children)

If I didn't miss it, no wireless charging again... Some one told me they refuse to do it because it wastes electricity. To which I'd say, even just turning on a car probably uses magnitudes more energy than charging my phone wirelessly. I don't want to mess up the USB C port if I don't have to, thanks.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

3.5mm Jack or - sadly - GTFO

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›