this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025
11 points (86.7% liked)

politics

24494 readers
3731 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump is due to speak on the phone to his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin on Tuesday to discuss a US-proposed Ukraine ceasefire deal.

all 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

Really disgusting this is happening.

[–] el_muerte@lemm.ee 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Putin also outlined some of his questions over how a ceasefire would work. He asked: "How will those 30 days be used? For Ukraine to mobilise? Rearm? Train people? Or none of that? Then a question - how will that be controlled?

"Who will give the order to end the fighting? At what cost? Who decides who has broken any possible ceasefire, over 2,000km? All those questions need meticulous work from both sides. Who polices it?"

Putin's worried Ukraine will do everything he's planning to do.

[–] NimdaQA@lemmy.world -4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Putin’s worried Ukraine will do everything he’s planning to do.

More like Putin's worried that Ukraine will do everything they did last time a ceasefire happened.

Zelenskyy even admitted that he never planned to implement Minsk II, but also Merkel implied that assurances made toward Minsk to Russia was merely to buy time for Ukraine’s arms build-up.

Heck look at the recent ceasefire on attacks against energy infrastructure.

Ukraine just broke the ceasefire on attacks against energy infrastructure.

Russia’s attack earlier today occurred before Ukraine accepted the ceasefire and was a retaliation for Ukraine’s failed offensive into Belgorod. Ukraine accepted the ceasefire a few hours after the attack before launching drones at a Russian oil depot.

[–] NimdaQA@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Putin has been speaking with Trump on phone for over an hour. I believe 2 hours now. I wonder if Putin got past talking about the Kievan Rus’ and gotten to the Golden Horde yet?

I hope the arrangement that Putin and Trump get to is this (many of you will disagree) but Putin’s current offer is Ukraine recognizes of Russia’s annexation of the four provinces that Russia controls or partially controls.

[–] Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What should happen being realistic is: either putin gets no territory but ukraine gets no security (no nato nor EU nor mutual defence with EU nations) or ukraine gets security (NATO, EU or mutual defence with EU nations) but Russia gains all territory it currently occupies

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Self proclaimed kings splitting their conquest. We will all pay dearly when the authoritarians of the world unite.