this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2025
607 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

72382 readers
2536 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

That almost sounds right, doesn't it? If you want 5 million books, you can't just steal/pirate them, you need to buy 5 million copies. I'm glad the court ruled that way.

I feel that's a good start. Now we need some more clear regulation on what fair use is and what transformative work is and what isn't. And how that relates to AI. I believe as it's quite a disruptive and profitable business, we should maybe make those companies pay some extra. Not just what I pay for a book. But the first part, that "stealing" can't be "fair" is settled now.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Fuck the AI nut suckers and fuck this judge.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Dragomus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So, let me see if I get this straight:

Books are inherently an artificial construct. If I read the books I train the A(rtificially trained)Intelligence in my skull.
Therefore the concept of me getting them through "piracy" is null and void...

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

No. It is not inherently illegal for AI to "read" a book. Piracy is going to be decided at trial.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›