this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

15307 readers
303 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Karen Allen, the perfect example of aging naturally and radiating beauty.

[–] Apocalypteroid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Petite brunette women with green eyes have always been my thing. I realised recently that is entirely due to Karen Allen.

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 0 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

She isn't even specifically my type, but her smile in this Indy 4 promo foto

collapsed inline mediaKaren Allen in Indiana Jones 4 promo photo
was just absolutely captivating

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] muhyb@programming.dev 0 points 1 day ago (3 children)

-Why there are pyramids in Egypt?

-Because Brits couldn't moved them to British Museum.

[–] GandalftheBlack@feddit.org 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Imagine doing a Gate of Ishtar maneuver but with the pyramids

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 0 points 1 day ago

It's not quite the same thing (particularly because of the motivation), but, uhh…I suggest you read about Abu Simbel, if you haven't already.

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

how to write lists

- Why there are pyramids in Egypt?
- Because Brits couldn’t moved them to British Museum.

renders to

  • Why there are pyramids in Egypt?
  • Because Brits couldn’t moved them to British Museum.

Markdown guide is in the toolbar (?⃝) alongside a button for lists.

[–] muhyb@programming.dev 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Well, that's the reason why I didn't write it like that. I wanted it to look like a dash, just like in novels.

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So breaking accessibility for the heck of it? How forward-thinking.

[–] muhyb@programming.dev 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How is it breaking accessibility?

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Good question: for basic accessibility, structure should be conveyed, which adds

when technologies support programmatic relationships, it is strongly encouraged that information and relationships be programmatically determined

The web supports programmatic relationships through correct markup, so the technique using semantic elements to mark up structure applies, specifically by using ol, ul and dl for lists or groups of links or the markdown equivalent.

If you want to experience this yourself, then put on a blindfold, use a screenreader & compare your "list" to mine.

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It doesn't look like a list to me, but a riddle.

Would putting a Q: and A: in front of them satisfy you or would that send you off on a different tangent of chastising web users on their formatting?

Maybe instead of people needing to apply exacting rules to accommodate an accessibility tech, the tech should get better at interpreting human tendencies of writing. Even today I can write in a non-structured natural language form and a decent chat bot can typically make a reasonable interpretation of it without help.

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

It doesn’t look like a list to me

Then the - weren't needed.

Maybe instead of people needing to apply exacting rules to accommodate an accessibility tech

  1. Nah, writing a space the conventional way suffices: - SPACE list item. Even aesthetically, the plain text looks atrocious without a space there & worse when rendered.
  2. The technology is fine, there was even a button in the toolbar. It's not that hard to figure out to anyone trying: there's a preview button & they can edit.

All anyone has to do is (1) follow regular convention or (2) use the technology. Getting this wrong despite the technology & standard convention is less a technology problem & more a user problem.

[–] muhyb@programming.dev 0 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I don't have a screen reader installed so I cannot try it but I can guess how it can screw with it. However I agree with Monkey With A Shell here. It's not realistic for all users to follow semantics, this can only be solved with a better software.

While I use markdown daily, apparently there are still things I don't know about it. Well, I mostly learn them when I need them but still. So, I could use (speech dash) instead of -, which I assume wouldn't cause a problem with a screen reader. There is no way for me to remember its shortcut on the keyboard, but it seems Markdown already covered this with --- which ends up rendered as .

Thanks for making me noticing about it, learned something new today.

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

It’s not realistic for all users to follow semantics

Not realistic for users to write lists the normal way that doesn't look wrong? I don't know guys

-first

-second

-third

looks obviously bad whereas

- first
- second
- third

looks right. Then you see the rendered result in preview. You also had a button in the toolbar to create a list.

I don't think this is asking much.

If you weren't trying to write a list, though, then I don't know what you were doing & I doubt a chat bot will either: could you link to an example of what you were trying to do? For all you know, I'm a chat bot not figuring out your intent. No technology is about to fix PEBKAC.

I think the bottom line is if you write lists normally, then everything else including accessibility will turn out right without you needing to understand the intricacies.

[–] muhyb@programming.dev 0 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

I definitely wasn't trying to write a list, it was a riddle or a conversation. What I was trying to do is this:

collapsed inline media

Though, it seems speech dash is not a thing in English. So I understand the confusion.

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

You had me pondering…yes, quotation dash: it is a thing in English, just less common!

Please disregard what I wrote before: you had it almost correct, but use em dashes as you suggested before. Some OSes offer nice character pickers for less common punctuation: for example, Windows summons it with WindowsKey-.. Apologies.

[–] muhyb@programming.dev 0 points 18 hours ago

No worries. I tried to look on my English novels first but couldn't find anything like this. I was almost certain that I saw this in one of the Roald Dahls but nope. Well, learned the official name of it too, quotation dash. Thanks.

By the way, Meta (Windows key) + . opens emoji list in KDE.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

By the way, Markdown also takes escape \, which is why sometimes the shrugging emoticon is missing left arm.

- So this
- also works with space

So you don't even necessarily have to leave out the space.

[–] muhyb@programming.dev 0 points 22 hours ago

Apparently there is already a separate symbol for speech dash, which is —. However its keyboard shortcut is obscure and I couldn't remember it later, but Markdown already covered this it seems. Writing --- renders as —, which I'll do from now on, if I don't forget about it next time.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

scandalized stare

edit *innocent stare I meant

collapsed inline media

[–] lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Many ethnic minorities complain that their cultural heritage is exhibitioned in the capital far away. Countries are a social construct

[–] Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So a museum in Western Europe or the US is better, or just as bad?

[–] lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's worse, obviously. It's not enough to bring it into the country but it's worse to keep it in Western Europe or the US. You could argue that once it's in the capital it won't travel anywhere closer to the people but when it stays in London or Berlin, it's not moving anywhere. On the other hand, once you ship it to the country of origin, you can take the extra mile and bring it to the cultural heirs. But keeping it is the worst option.

[–] Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 23 hours ago

You're right, and I was being facetious.

You responded well and explained it for all. Thank you.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] moobythegoldensock@infosec.pub 0 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Gotta love how the first movie opens with him stealing an idol from an uncontacted Peruvian tribe, and the heroic music swells as he narrowly escapes with spears flying around them.

Granted, this takes place in 1936 and his actions were the norm for the period, but despite coming out in 1981 the movie plays this scene out rather uncritically.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

He narrowly escapes with his life after having the idol stolen from him by his rival, Belloq, who works for the Nazis and actually hired that Peruvian tribe to be his little private army. Belloq then orders the Peruvians to attack Jones and he barely escapes on his hired plane.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 0 points 22 hours ago (4 children)

Temple of Doom had way more questionable scenes in it with the banquet, the heroic British soldiers at the end and... Short Round. Did they really have to name him that?

Although the cultists were based on a real group and I actually saw something that looked like the heart thing in an Indian movie, so maybe that's based on something real as well.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Countries and borders are an arbitrary concept created during the peace treaty of Westphalia.

Those relics belong to dead people.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 0 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (3 children)

Yeah, it's definitely a little questionable when the people currently inhabiting the land have no direct connection to the people who made the artifacts. And then you got shit like this. Or this. Or this.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ProvableGecko@lemmy.world 0 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Countries and borders are an arbitrary concept created during the peace treaty of Westphalia.

Stealing this foolproof argument for when I next apply for a UK visa to go to British Museum. Thanks!

Attributing modern concepts of borders to Westphalia is a Eurocentric worldview. What, you don't think they had the concept of statehood and sovereignty in Asia for at least a few thousand years prior to this?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] kruhmaster@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago

Forgot the zoom on the bottom panels.

[–] greenskye@lemmy.zip 0 points 23 hours ago (5 children)

What's the opinion on certain high risk countries where there's a high likelihood of the artifacts simply being destroyed? If I remember correctly ISIS and other similar organizations have burned or bombed several historical sites before.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 0 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Museums should participate in cultural exchange, if a museum feels under threat then they have channels they can trust to protect their artifacts until they can be returned

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] makyo@lemmy.world 0 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

We have to be extremely wary of people who cite that because it's so easily used as a justification for artifact theft and can have deep roots in racism.

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 0 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

That's the question. Where is the line between racism and artifact protection?

[–] lath@lemmy.world 0 points 22 hours ago

Presumably somewhere between racism and artifact protection.

[–] vorb0te@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Adults have the right to make their own mistakes?

[–] lath@lemmy.world 0 points 22 hours ago

At the expense of everyone else?

[–] toast@retrolemmy.com 0 points 19 hours ago

If you're suggesting a daring heist at the Smithsonian, I'm in!

[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 0 points 17 hours ago (6 children)

The only opinion that should matter is that of the people the artifacts belong to.

“It’s safer with us” is an excuse that’s been abused by colonizers and raiders for too long.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Scott_of_the_Arctic@lemmy.world 0 points 20 hours ago

Well I'm British so... fuuuck that!

[–] wanderwisley@lemm.ee 0 points 20 hours ago

Britannia Jones and the stolen museum artifacts.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 0 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Marion, this is a movie made in the 1980s and set in the 1930s, what the hell are you even talking about?

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 0 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

"I liked you better when you were a child I was grooming!"

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 0 points 19 hours ago

Marion, you knew when you met me that I came from the mind of George Lucas. It's not my fault I'm a little fucked up!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works 0 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

better a museum than on a shelf in someone's living room (no I won't be donating it)

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›