this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2025
77 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

72338 readers
2804 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 33 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wood is dead. So, it's like wood, but imagine if that wood was alive!

[–] nicerdicer@feddit.org 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So they basically re-invented trees?

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 9 points 1 week ago

ANYTHING but reforestation! That's for hippies

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 week ago

Hydrogel and algae.

I wonder about the upkeep, fungus, infections, if you use this in buildings?

is alive, grows and actively removes carbon from the air.

And gives the carbon back after it dies.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Where does the CO2 go when it dies?

Look...man...the whole thing about carbon is the carbon cycle, right?

Well we are breaking that cycle by digging up long-sequestered carbon (in the form of long-chain hydrocarbons aka "fossil fuels") and burning them up in alarming quantities.

At absolute best, this material will be carbon neutral.

We need more phytoplankton...when that consumes CO2 and dies, most of it sinks to the ocean depths forever, instead of coming up to the atmosphere.

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I’d heard a fairly novel idea about farming trees and burying them as pulp in old mines, I’m sure it’s just ASKING for some kind of wild underground mine fire but … similar concept

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I think that wouldn't work unless the mine is perfectly sealed.

The pulp would still get eaten and digested microorganisms and carbon released to air.

Plus there would be a ton of wasted carbon on harvest, pulpifying, transport...unless those are all done with green energy.

The reason why we have fossil fuels is because of the carbon that didn't get released to the atmosphere. It got trapped in a hypoxic water/swamps where bacteria and microorganisms couldn't decompose it.

We could build hypoxic lakes for disposal of large chunks of "organic" (as in alive) carbon to be sequestered...but it couldn't be done at a scale to even begin to touch what we've released. Maybe if we gmod some bacteria or plankton to chew it up and poop it up real fast. And put all the carbon we can find into the pit.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

What alien faction of what game/show does this look like?

collapsed inline media

[–] muhyb@programming.dev 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Looks like a Scrin building from Command & Conquer 3.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago

Right, knew i had seen this somewhere. Thought about Protoss but had mixed it up.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Is it more or less efficient than a grass roof?