MCasq_qsaCJ_234

Rather, ClockBench will end up improving AI in this regard over the next few years. This is because they need any AI benchmark to identify its strengths and weaknesses in order to improve it in future versions.

Obama will likely give it a small section in his Presidential Library, which will open in 2026.

I feel that the non-profit OpenAI will end up with a similar fate to the Mastercard Foundation in the medium term. While OpenAI PBC is the publicly traded Mastercard.

Although that would make it the richest organization in the world.

Before or after OpenAI goes public?

It sounds like a very discreet advertisement for their own social network.

I feel like the Cannes public will be like Anton Ego from Ratatouille and I only see two possibilities: it goes well or it goes badly.

Step 1: Put AI into production just to lower costs and increase efficiency

Step 2: People get angry about AI in the process

Step 3: Release a drug that doesn't have "AI" in the process and has a higher selling price, even though it's actually the same drug

Step 4: People buy it en masse

Step 5: Earn more money thanks to irrational hatred of AI

Step 6: You convince the Democrats that M4F only has AI drugs. But there are also private insurers

Step 7: People hire private insurance companies at higher prices and with misleading terms, just to get medications without "AIs."

Step 8: Pharmaceutical companies, insurance companies, and funeral homes make more money, while ordinary people become increasingly poorer.

“I think we are running out of low-hanging fruits to improve on,” says Xu. He added that the early agentic gains came from simple changes, “things like formatting errors, or not understanding tools [...] I think we’re going to slow down until we find the next big thing.”

Another AI winter? Another AI winter? (Possible in the medium or long term)

Although we'll also have to wait and see what John Carmack does, because he's also involved in this.

As far as I know, Altman does not own any shares in OpenAI.

And what a good explanation you gave, although that is what happens in game theory, right? That normally the human being wants more despite the risk.

I don't understand why Ed Zitron considers this a sign of the end of OpenAI.

Although I only see OpenAI, it seems confident that its IPO can break records.

Ransomware of the future Forces companies to pay or all their content will be used to train AI

Tor and I2P will be the new norm of tomorrow