this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2025
238 points (96.1% liked)

science

19501 readers
1070 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 165 points 1 day ago (4 children)
[–] Vaggumon@lemmy.zip 31 points 1 day ago

Was my first thought too.

[–] FreakinSteve@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"She wont fuck me any more because I started sucking Charlie Kirk's cock!"

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 3 points 2 hours ago

Ben Shapiro is saving himself for his sister please don't spread misinformation

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 12 points 1 day ago

It's good to challenge and confirm common sense scientifically. There are many examples where common sense wasn't as sensible as originally thought.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Why date someone who actively votes against your family's best interests?

[–] grte@lemmy.ca 80 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I couldn't imagine marrying someone with totally opposing political views. Disagreements on some issues sure, but totally opposing political views is essentially like having totally opposing values, morals and ethics to a degree, etc. Base things that play a role in determining compatibility.

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Dating someone with opposing views is the easier of two situations people can find themselves in.

The harder situation is when you date and marry someone with similar views to yours, but then 5, 10, 15, etc years into the marriage they get radicalized by family members or YouTube. And suddenly their opinions change overnight and you are legally bound to an angry, hostile stranger.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The good old dehu-Manosphere. Malignant, cancerous trash run by grifters and signal boosted by insecure mysognists.

Edit: I see we have some fans of Joe Rogaine, Jordan Small-Peterson, and or Andrew T-hate on here.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 22 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I thought I was going crazy when this person I went on a couple dates with told me she was gonna pursue the other guy. She had said he was a Trump supporter and was offended at some things he’d said to her. Must have had she face of a movie star and a genius in bed. I was pretty offended, but whatever.

[–] cevn@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sounds like you dodged a massive bullet lol.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 1 day ago

My partner is a refugee who escaped a regime that locked her up for advocating for democracy, so I clearly won.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Some women never grow out of their "bad boys" phase, so there's that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 63 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yeah, if my wife didn't think other people deserved the right to exist it would put quite the strain on our relationship.

[–] rarbg@lemmy.zip 47 points 1 day ago (4 children)

The real question: how do they make it past the dating stage?

[–] grue@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago

They start out aligned, but then one person's ideology changes over time (perhaps even after marriage).

[–] Malfeasant@lemmy.world 19 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I was raised a combination of atheist (mom) and Quaker (dad) - the atheism definitely won, though I did internalize a decent amount of the Quakerism... I was engaged to a Catholic girl in my mid-20s. We discussed things early on, I said I'd respect her beliefs if she'd respect my lack thereof, and for a while it worked out nicely, we'd talk about spiritual stuff, but neither of us was trying to convert the other, it was more of a "how do you feel about x" or "how do you explain y"... But after a while, she decided that since I was "preventing" her from going to church some Sundays (I wasn't, I was fine with her going without me, she just didn't want to if she had the option to stay in bed and fool around with me, and why on earth would I turn her down?) that she wanted me to go with her the next Sunday whenever she skipped one. In retrospect, this was the first nail in the coffin of our relationship, but of course I didn't recognize it at the time. It took us moving in together permanently for me to see how controlling she was, and how mean she could be if she didn't get her way...

[–] theblips@lemm.ee 11 points 23 hours ago

She was a church-going catholic, wanted you to go too, but was living together before marriage (mortal sin), fooling around (mortal sin) and engaged to an atheist (not a sin in itself but frowned upon)? I mean yeah, just the sheer contradiction of these is a red flag, no wonder the girl ended up being messed up later on

[–] thevoidzero@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Sometimes you don't know. Or think it's not important.

There's this thing basically (you've probably heard about it), "I don't like X people, but you're good because you're not like them". X can be race, gender, any other things. When you are with that kinda person as long as they like you, you won't feel how they are, they'll treat you nice but it's an exception not the rule. But when they don't like you, they revert back to treating you like the X group. They'll even go "I knew X would be like this" and all.

Now in many cases if they were vocal about it from the beginning you'd notice and might get away. But in many cases they won't be vocal, or they'll talk about it with some extreme examples which you might feel is justified and you know you're not like that so it's fine. And in those cases you yourself might hate those subgroup for ruining your reputation so you might even bond over that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] seven_phone@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Who is funding this calibre of research, they also found dogs are more likely to bite if you kick them in the head.

[–] triptrapper@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

In the western scientific model, this is how we differentiate truths from anecdotes and assumptions. Not sure why this needs to be repeated in every thread about the results of research.

[–] seven_phone@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (3 children)

No one is casting aspersions on the scientific method or the value of research, what is questionable in this case is that the conclusion simply follows naturally from the hypothesis. The proposition here is that people who have opposing political views are more likely to be antagonistic to each other, that is a tautology.

[–] StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

And yet, you’ll see many people posting elsewhere on social media that it shouldn’t be relevant.

Can’t imagine trying to share a life with someone who didn’t share my values, but there seems to be a contingent that think that other things should be more important.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 points 2 hours ago

Because America is fucked and the rest of the West is just a couple steps behind them.

[–] Dorkyd68@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I cant imagine marrying a fascist

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gowron_Howard@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Why would anyone marry a person who openly hates women, minorities, LGBTQ+, and anybody they deem different?

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 48 minutes ago) (17 children)

Because one or the other person in the relationship isn't being honest which happens quite frequently. People in relationships lie by omission all the time.

load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] 13igTyme@lemmy.world 24 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

My wife has a friend who is a quirky anime loving girl with no desire for kids, not religious, and makes good money in healthcare.

Her friend is married to a hardcore Trump cultist that really wants kids, is very religious, and despite not having a good paying job, wants his wife to stay home and tend to the future kids.

My wife and I just honestly don't understand how they are married.

[–] Dicska@lemmy.world 8 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Don't worry, it's only a matter of time and they will join you in not understanding.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 points 2 hours ago

Or they become a bangmaid. One of the two.

[–] supernight52@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

Lol that divorce is coming, it's just a matter of "when" not "if."

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 7 hours ago

Yeah no shit. If my partner thinks social welfare is bad and i am a socialist, ofc we wont get along

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 17 points 12 hours ago

Considering we are reaching a point where the political differences May very well might be whether your spouse deserves to exist and not be chattel breeding slaves, yeah easy to guess why it's a deal breaker.

[–] MelloniDev@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 day ago

Something something floor made out of floor

[–] mysticpickle@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago
[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 9 hours ago

I don't get along well with people who aren't at least within "discussing distance" politically. I wonder how people even date when they don't agree on some fundamentals.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 7 points 1 day ago

I love the virtue signaling the OP triggered haha

[–] Cherry@piefed.social 6 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

A lot of people saying how does this happen, it happens over time with small shifts. It happens because our stability as communities and nations is changing faster and more frequently.

Question is when do you take off the wedding ring? (or mental equivalent) because your promise to this person is most likely the strongest conviction most people hold. For better or for worse, implies we understand a partnership has ups and downs that we ride through. A fundamental change is attitude could be seen as an up or a down.

load more comments (1 replies)

This sounds like something I would tell my friends as a "joke" when we where all very tired.

[–] Buske@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

Well when one side wants to literally murder the other, Yeah.

load more comments
view more: next ›