this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2025
323 points (98.5% liked)

Showerthoughts

35221 readers
644 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Remember when Google introduced text-only ads to replace flashing animated banners and pop-up ads popular at the time? I didn't mind those and I didn't need an adblocker.

Nowadays YouTube is the primary reason I have to use an adblocker. It is literally unusable with all the ads.

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 94 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That's because every company's strategy aiming to monopolize is to:

  1. Make a product that's genuinely better than what's on the market for some role. Sometimes by undercutting competition at a loss, sometimes by making things very convenient, etc.
  2. Once you're big enough, make sure as you keep growing that new competition can't pop up to challenge you. Kick the ladder down behind you, and make sure to start greasing the palms of lawmakers so they can't challenge you in step 3.
  3. Once you're so big that you've monopolized the market and can't be challenged no matter what you do (both because of ladder-kicking and because everyone uses you by default), do what you've been wanting to this whole time and go from "boiling frog"-pace enshittification to "welp, this sucks, but now I have nowhere else to go" enshittification.

It's why people who say "Oh, well I wouldn't mind it if X had a monopoly because they're way better than those other companies" are so painfully misguided.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I was using adblockers well before Google existed since the internet was already full of that shit by the time they came around. Actually was kind of a selling point for them back in the day; no clutter, no ads, simple layout, great results.

My, how the mighty have fallen...

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Back in the day you accepted it because it wasn't full on tracking you, wasn't building profiles on you, wasn't infiltrating all your search history just to sell you shit. It was a banner, you clicked or you didn't. Enshittification hadnt happened.

Now? Block it all!!

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Were the adblockers in the mid 90s blocking parts of pages like banner ads, or were they just the popup blockers? I think I may have used the latter.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

They didn't block the entire element, but they blocked banners and in-page ads somehow. You'd just see a broken image icon where the ad would normally be and it wouldn't be a clickable link.

The popup banners were the real things you're killing. Some sites would have popups that had their own popups, so you open the wrong page (without an ad blocker) and it's like a recursive loop of popups constantly popping up, consuming all resources on the PC until it blue screened.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

They were crude by today's standards, often just blocking entire domains.

[–] L0rdMathias@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 week ago

Google lost the high ground when AI generated Joe Rogan was blatantly selling crypto scams on YouTube. Advertisers don't even care about the quality of the advertisements, every single industry that has used advertisement as its primary foundation always becomes a group of crooks living in a cataclysmic house of cards.

Pay only for products or for services. If no payment option exists to receive that product or service - and that product or service alone with no extra baggage/strings attached - then you must assume you're being scammed.

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I won't watch YouTube without an adblocker. Used to pay for premium for years through VPN in turkey, was like $4/ month for family plan. But now they region lock payment methods. So back to ublock origin and Firefox in addition to a pihole setup that blocks hundreds of thousands of ad sites. Fuck advertisements.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

they also punish users who used adblock and then disable by increasing the amount of ads you see.

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

It will never be disabled for that domain lol. I there will always be ways around it.

[–] Krudler@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago

What was great about those days was that often, the ads were actually relevant to the page I was on and led me to more quality content.

I ran an adsense site, and I got great results hosting and running ads.

Now ads are fire-hose shit that has zero relevance to me, my life, or what I'm searching.

[–] HenriVolney@sh.itjust.works -4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

You don't have to use YouTube

[–] FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You don't even need a car. You can just walk. You also don't really need a grocery store, you can just grow your own food.

Modern society hasn't been about what we "need" for hundreds or thousands of years.

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You don't need oxygen, just die

Lmao

[–] FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Going off your chain to the extreme

[–] HenriVolney@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I don't see your point. I am using a front end that feeds me YT content without ever opening the YT app that I actually disabled. You don't have to use YouTube.

[–] FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Haha, I understand now!

[–] colourlessidea@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Which one do you use? I have a hard time finding something that works well, especially on mobile (iOS)

Edit: nvm, saw on another comment that it’s NewPipe

[–] cloudless@piefed.social 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

YouTube isn’t a necessity — and neither is the internet, really. We don’t need them to survive. That said, I do enjoy YouTube as a form of entertainment. I’ve tried alternatives like NewPipe and Invidious, but none of them work as smoothly as YouTube with ad blockers.

[–] HenriVolney@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I use NewPipe, all YT links are redirected to NP app. It is flawless.

[–] Little8Lost@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So you mean people dont have to use YTs native frontend?
First message sounded like you implied others could switch to peertube or something (which is an option but with tradeoffs)

[–] HenriVolney@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Yeah, I sorta shortcuted my comment. Happens all the time

[–] spittingimage@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Once upon a time people would have thought it was crazy to try controlling how someone interacts with your content on the internet.

I don't remember anyone asking if we were okay with changing that.