this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2025
368 points (99.2% liked)

politics

23968 readers
3214 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The labor market is slowing, but it’s all good news in the White House.

The U.S. added 139,000 jobs in May, a slight decline from April, according to a jobs report released Friday. The unemployment rate remained at 4.2 percent, still within the ballpark of historic lows reached in 2023, when the unemployment rate reached 3.4 percent—the lowest it had been in more than five decades. But within the folds of the report hid a major red flag for Donald Trump’s agenda: The U.S. is still bleeding manufacturing jobs.

But even the president’s favorite conservative network couldn’t hide its dismay at the slight manufacturing downturn.

“Now, 8,000 manufacturing jobs were lost in May. That’s not what you wanted to see,” said Fox Business host Stuart Varney.

top 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 71 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

I know more were lost in June. My company, in a tariff response, is moving US jobs out because none of our global customers want to pay said tariffs, so we're shrinking our us manufacturer operations and making other sites.

Edit: the tariffs to import the raw materials to actually make stuff is what costs my employer the most.

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 52 points 1 day ago

I work at a factory in Canada. We just got a huge contract from European customers and we've been told we're running more machines on 24/7 shifts to meet demand and hiring 50 new staff to do it. The clients switched from producing in the US to avoid costs associated with the trade war.

[–] Sabin10@lemmy.world 46 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Putting tariffs on raw materials and natural resources you don't have domestically is possibly the dumbest thing a politician could do.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

I think in most cases we do technically have them domestically, but we're rightfully unwilling to strip-mine ourselves and wreck the landscape to extract them. On the other hand, Trump, with his rapist mentality, is perfectly happy to force that to happen, will of the public be damned.

[–] thedruid@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Companies with warehouses and facilities in multiple countries are all sitting pretty. In fact some are expanding quickly

[–] jawa22@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I have been working for and by myself as a machinist for the last 15 years. The first round of steel tariffs hurt a lot, but I was able to pull through just barely. Now, I am losing every contract I've got when they expire (which is soon) and as a small fish I have almost no bargaining power on bids for jobs. I am likely going to have to shutter the business and sell all the equipment.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 1 points 3 hours ago

Almost like that was part of the plan

[–] Placebonickname@lemmy.world 65 points 1 day ago (3 children)

U mean asking manufacturers to pay MORE to produce in America encourages them to move production to other countries? You’re kidding!

[–] HorseTesselator@midwest.social 42 points 1 day ago (5 children)

It's worse than that.

Let's say I want to open a widget factory in America because of the tariffs. Sure, I can avoid the tariffs on the widgets themselves by making them here, but there's a big problem...

What about the tariffs on the materials needed to make them?

So Trump wants to strong-arm a minerals deal with some country via a protection racket only to... tariff them?

Jesus Christ.

Unironically, depending on how the supply chain is arranged for your industry, it may actually be cheaper to move your manufacturing off shore and eat the tariff once instead of getting nickeled and dimed for every single item you need to assemble on shore. Hell, Vietnam already figured out you can ship Chinese products through to America as grey imports and skim off the top.

It is hard for me to articulate just how fucking stupid all of this is. It's no small wonder how this guy bankrupted six casinos.

But hey, Art of the Deal, baby.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It is hard for me to articulate just how fucking stupid all of this is. It's no small wonder how this guy bankrupted six casinos.

I always assumed they were bankrupted on purpose as part of some sort of money laundering scheme, but you're bringing me around to the idea that it may actually have been sheer stupidity rather than crime.

[–] Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

This is exactly what some of the biggest manufacturers of cars in America are thinking of doing. They manufacture in America but a lot of the parts are imported and would cost them a fortune to import. It's cheaper to move factories to China, build the full part, and then ship it over because the tarrifs are higher on the individual tech parts inside the assembly than a finished product using those parts.

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 20 hours ago

Unironically, depending on how the supply chain is arranged for your industry, it may actually be cheaper to move your manufacturing off shore and eat the tariff once instead of getting nickeled and dimed for every single item you need to assemble on shore.

And that's not even accounting for forecasting, which is still necessary in the stupid-frahile JIT approach. Noone will want to sign a long-term supply contract when they could get screwed by sudden tarrifs and the JIT people have to rely on luck to avoid subjecting customers to sticker-price whiplash.

It's all just so fucking stupid.

[–] huppakee@lemm.ee 1 points 21 hours ago

I don't disagree with your point, but except for electronics, and Italian marble America can make a lot of the materials themselves. The biggest problem is in many cases the price of labour in the US. And for complex things like cars you can't even move the entire supply chain even if you wanted to.

There was this guy who had a theory that there was nobody on earth who could make a microwave oven, turns out he was right: there are people who can know how to make a certain part of it and other people who knew about it's assembly nobody can create one start to finish. So imagine with more complex machines how difficult it'd be to bring all those skills and knowledge 'home' to America.

[–] macaw_dean_settle@lemmy.world 0 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 16 hours ago

Both are correct, country dependant.

Unless you also correct colour and shit as well in which case go nuts.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I am not sure about other industry, but in the pharmaceutical industry, several companies decided immediately to set up more manufacturing sites in the US after the tariff threat. But I think it is because these companies are producing weight loss drugs, which is selling like hot cakes since last year, so I think they know that the huge sales will offset the manufacturing cost and tariffs. These weight loss drugs are new and the patent rights is good for 15-20 years. Some industries are just lucky they are insulated from the worst of tariff impositions, while others are not so much.

[–] RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world 55 points 1 day ago (2 children)

it's almost like Trump doesn't know what he's doing or something

[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He knows exactly what he’s doing. Stealing money. That’s it.

[–] huppakee@lemm.ee 3 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

it's almost like Trump doesn't know what ~~he's doing~~ damage he's doing while stealing money or something*

[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 7 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

He doesn't care. It's not a concern whatsoever.

[–] huppakee@lemm.ee 2 points 21 hours ago

He's proven that alright

[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

His only motivator is greed because he wasn’t love by his dad.

[–] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If the smartest smerican doesn't know, who else?

[–] Sc00ter@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago
[–] mriguy@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

Looks like they may need to destroy a few more government agencies that collect and distribute labor statistics. That will solve it.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 14 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Industrial capital spending has never, ever been as low as it is right now, even during Covid. It's pretty much zero, because nobody has any intention of investing in any sort of industrial infrastructure in a complete clusterfuck of economic and trade policy. The chicken hasn't come close to roosting yet, give it another few months and watch the bloodbath.

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 hours ago

They also gorged themselves on basically zero percent lending, used it for things along the lines of stock buybacks and now their equipment/supply chain is failing. Low corporate taxes mean there's no incentive to reinvest, certainly not upping wages.

Capitalism is a cancer that's running out of healthy cells.

[–] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago
[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 11 points 1 day ago
[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 10 points 22 hours ago

Small businesses come and go, but lately I have seen a shit ton of small businesses disappear.

Every policy makes winners and losers. The current administrations policies are making a lot more losers than winners to enrich themselves. It is pure unfettered corruption.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Anyway so I've noticed how the freeways are clear sooner than usual after 5pm. They're still long, but sooner means less people in the rat race trying to get home from work.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

There was a study or survey or something that showed people are leaving the office earlier than they did before the pandemic, the average being between 3 and 4 pm.

100% true for me

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Same here. The pandemic showed me a couple of things very clearly:

  1. humans make a shit tom of noise.
  2. we pollute and change the climate with our pollution.
  3. staying at home gives me freedom to learn and do a whole bunch of other things.
[–] grue@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah that's what I really meant. Cars, planes and large machinery. When all that stopped for the couple of years...days sometimes weeks at a time, everything was eerily silent.

[–] AngrySquirrel@lemm.ee 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

That sounds nice. Where I was at the time was close enough to a baptist church that I couldn't escape their speakers blaring doomsday baptist sermons and gospel music. All day. Every day. For the entire time that churches weren't allowed to meet inside.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 3 points 22 hours ago

Oh that's hilarious. We used to live near a Jehovah's temple or whatever they call it. That literally stopped going house to house for a while.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Scrambles to do what? Buy or sell?

[–] zurohki@aussie.zone 10 points 1 day ago

Just scrambles in place, like eggs.

[–] mhague@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

A 2021 study by Oxford Economics and the U.S.-China Business Council concluded that the United States lost 245,000 jobs as a result of the Trump tariffs.

They're going to study these tariffs and detail how they fucked America and by the time Republicans do something similar nobody will ever, EVER, bring this up again.

[–] Freshparsnip@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

Wasn't the alleged purpose of tariffs to bring manufacturing goods to America?