this post was submitted on 26 May 2025
259 points (95.8% liked)

Games

38879 readers
1136 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here and here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Eggyhead@lemmings.world 191 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (13 children)
  1. It’s $80
  2. It’s on Gamespass, where I assume a lot of doom fans who might have otherwise purchased are likely to be.
  3. It’s shouldered up against Expedition 33 and Oblivion Remake, both over $20 cheaper and highly acclaimed.
  4. It’s $80
  5. (Edit) shitty DRM
[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 107 points 4 days ago (7 children)
[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 35 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Mostly this. I’m not paying for something that comes with malware. Not for $80, $20, or $1. Nobody should pay for malware.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] wcSyndrome@lemm.ee 15 points 4 days ago (3 children)
[–] RiQuY@lemm.ee 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] Nephalis@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

79,99€ in Germany

I am interested, but not that much to pay more than 20€ in a sale in a few years. It was the same with Doom Eternal. And I haven't bought it to this day 😅

Maybe it will never be bought 🤷🏻‍♂️

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Aganim@lemmy.world 124 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Seeing how they screwed over Mick Gordon, the composer for the previous two installments, I'll vote with my wallet and skip this one. My backlog is big enough as it is anyway.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] yesman@lemmy.world 113 points 4 days ago (24 children)

meant to mislead potential players into thinking the game is successful when, in fact, it's severely underperforming behind the scenes.

Why would a player in a single-player game give a tiny shit about how popular it is? It's the investor class that cares about that; stop treating their interests as a natural good.

load more comments (24 replies)
[–] mysticpickle@lemmy.ca 93 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Marty Stratton and his denuvo riddled pos game can kindly get fukt after what he did to Mick Gordon, the composer of the banger soundtrack for Doom 2016.

https://medium.com/@mickgordon/my-full-statement-regarding-doom-eternal-5f98266b27ce

[–] kurcatovium@lemm.ee 27 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Holy fucking shit! I live under the rock in the middle of nowhere so I've heard only some brief parts of "something wrong with DOOM Eternal music" but nothing factual. Now I gave the time to read the whole article and I'm speechless. 'Cause this is bad, really, really, REALLY bad. I feel sorry for people that have to work and live under such assholes like Marty obviously is...

[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 15 points 4 days ago

Yea, I read that a few weeks ago and it convinced to not touch Doom TDA. I mean, maybe pirate it, but certainly not buy it.

[–] Don_alForno@feddit.org 14 points 4 days ago

Wow. I already wasn't going to buy any more Bethesda slop, but now I'm not going to buy it twice.

[–] Damarus@feddit.org 59 points 4 days ago (3 children)

It's also 80€ in Europe. Everyone I talked to is waiting for the price to drop, including me.

[–] arudesalad@sh.itjust.works 24 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

It's £70 in the uk, that's $95 while in the us it costs $70, which is £50. Xbox did the same thing with the new call of duty, their regional pricing is so braindead.

Historically AAA games have been £10 less than the us counter part ($60 games were £50) and making this change is so stupid.

[–] jackod@lemmy.nz 13 points 4 days ago

$130 NZD, I don't want to guess what $80 USD games are going to "convert" too 😮‍💨

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] caut_R@lemmy.world 56 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I don‘t buy any digital copy of a game for over 45 bucks, doesn‘t matter what it is… I also haven‘t finished DOOM 2016 yet and haven‘t even started Eternal. Not because they‘re bad games or because I don‘t like FPSs, but because I have so much shit to play and so little time.

Competition is fierce and asking 80 bucks when I got the predecessors for less than 5 each is just not happening. Just because games cost more to produce doesn‘t magically make customers have more money and time. It‘ll make release weeks stinkers outside of your GOTYs and makes more people wait or go back to 20+ years worth of other games that aren‘t 80 bucks.

[–] TaiCrunch@sh.itjust.works 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

$20 is the limit for me. I'm perfectly fine waiting a few years to play the game, if it still exists by that point. If it doesn't, then I'm glad I didn't waste my time.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Games cost more to produce but there's more customers than ever

And its certainly not the developers who are getting all that extra money.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] trslim@pawb.social 28 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Forcing raytracing is a great way to close off a bunch of customers.

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago

Not just because some people don't have it either, but for anything with RTX2000/3000 and RDNA2, Forced RT is just forced low framerate.

I hope making everyone dynamically draw the lights and shadows in realtime for a linear game was worth the 15c it saved on Microsoft's electricity bill for not pre-baking overnight.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 27 points 4 days ago

Game is 70$ on Steam US and has a very positive review. That is still too much money unless this is a game you were really looking forward to.

[–] nawa@lemmy.world 23 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Not sure about hardcore Doom fans but the game looks uninteresting to me specifically. It's like a polar opposite from Doom 2016 judging by all the videos I've seen. Don't really care about the higher price, I'd get it if I liked it but it really doesn't click for me.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] xangadix@lemmy.world 23 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (5 children)

I'm one of the biggest fans of the DOOM franchise, I've played all the versions since the original one in 1993. But I don't care if I play it now or in half a year. Or a year for that matter. Never really understood why having it first matters to anyone. I'll be here when the prices drop.

I was stupid enough to buy Spacemarine 2, when it came out, at full price (mostly because I loved Boltgun so much) and that was a great lesson about how you should wait around a bit before actually buying a game. It would have been a fun game for 15 or even 20 euro, but it's not worth 70 euro. I Should have bought Helldivers, anyway 😓

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] demizerone@lemmy.world 23 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

I would have bought it if it didn't have denuvo. I'll wait til its stripped out.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 21 points 4 days ago

As much as I love the Doom games I'm not really a fan of the $70 price tag. The Doom games are great games but it's not like they are in my top 5 favorite games or anything like that. I'll wait for a sale.

[–] Feyd@programming.dev 21 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I didn't even look at it enough to know if I'd buy it otherwise when I saw it has denuvo. Always online DRM is a hard pass for me. I haven't played the last 3 games Atlus released either and I've been playing almost every one since the ps2 era.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TripleIris@lemmy.wtf 19 points 4 days ago

AAA gaming is dead. Indies have been carrying gaming for years now.

[–] Emil_Zatopek1982@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago

That price was doomed.

[–] Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works 19 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I’m pretty sure that’s exactly how they want it to be. If they were interested in selling games they wouldn’t put them day one on gamepass.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago (1 children)

We went through this song and dance with Indiana Jones and Avowed, too. If this was a strategy that lost them money, they'd stop doing it. It turns out they're just fine with having tens of millions of subscribers that like the idea of getting access to games like these for, in plenty of cases, cheaper.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago

The DRM kept me from buying it

[–] tiny_hedgehog@lemm.ee 16 points 4 days ago (9 children)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I just barely convinced myself to spend €80 on a single game, then noticed Denuvo. Hard pass

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FinishingDutch@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago (11 children)

Honestly, Doom Eternal really soured me on the franchise. I loved the original Doom games, loved 3 and played the absolute shit out of Doom 2016.

Then Eternal turned into a fucking frustration fest with all its platforming. I still haven’t finished it. Now the new one reinvents Doom yet again. And there’s somehow dragons?

Man, I’m fucking done. Give me more of that 2016 Doom or don’t bother.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago

I hope this shows companies that selling their games at 80 Euro is not the way to go.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 13 points 4 days ago (2 children)

On GamePass though, isn't it? Only people actually buying would be on PS5 and the neversub gang.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Kurious84@eviltoast.org 13 points 4 days ago

I tell ya I se 70 bucks for a game when everything is small and you get no value for your dollar and everything costs more. No thanks.

[–] secret300@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Well it has Denuvo... I wasn't buying that shit

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] theotherbelow@lemmynsfw.com 13 points 4 days ago

In this economy? I'm sure its worth it but $70 is $70.

[–] Grizzlyboy@lemm.ee 12 points 4 days ago

Expedition 33 kinda takes all my time.

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

For me anyway, my loss of interest in the DOOM franchise began when they started dehumanizing the Doom Marine and started stacking fantasy/medieval elements to the main protagonist and his arsenal. They turned a futuristic space marine who just got punished for punching an officer into some sort of fantastic demigod thing. It got really bad in Doom Eternal already.

I like my DOOM games when it is a battle of sci-fi military forces against demonic forces. Human technology versus the hordes of hell. But now with Dark Ages Bethesda turned the franchise into a more violent and edgy Skyrim.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] nimmo@social.nimmog.uk 12 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I paid about £3.50 for Doom 2016 last week and around £12 for eternal, having not played a doom game since Doom 3's launch. I'm enjoying the 2016 one and will look forward to Eternal in a week or 3 once I finish that. what I won't do is pay £70 for a doom game. I might consider a games for windows sub to get it that way, but that remains to be seen.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (5 children)

there's a gorillion reasons why it isnt doing so hot, but i could make a few uneducated guesses. one, gamepass subscriptions, which obfuscate the data and has sent multiple studios to the grave even when they had moderate success. two, the economy is terrible in the US and getting worse by the day, making a $70+ game not an appealing purchase. three, maybe the Boycott Divestment Sanctions protest is having some effect.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›