this post was submitted on 22 May 2025
718 points (99.2% liked)

politics

23600 readers
3035 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sunschein@lemmy.world 191 points 2 days ago (5 children)

And it's behind a paywall. Chef's kiss.

[–] takeda@lemm.ee 107 points 2 days ago (7 children)

The Largest Upward Transfer of Wealth in American History

House Republicans voted to advance a bill that would offer lavish tax cuts for the rich while slashing benefits for the poor. By Jonathan Chait House Speaker Mike Johnson Kevin Dietsch / Getty May 22, 2025, 9:21 AM ET

House Republicans worked through the night to advance a massive piece of legislation that might, if enacted, carry out the largest upward transfer of wealth in American history.

That is not a side effect of the legislation, but its central purpose. The “big, beautiful bill” would pair huge cuts to food assistance and health insurance for low-income Americans with even larger tax cuts for affluent ones.

Hakeem Jeffries, the House minority leader, warned that the bill’s passage, by a 215–214 margin, would mark the moment the Republicans ensured the loss of their majority in the midterm elections. That may be so. But the Republicans have not pursued this bill for political reasons. They are employing a majority that they suspect is temporary to enact deep changes to the social compact.

The minority party always complains that the majority is “jamming through” major legislation, however deliberate the process may be. (During the year-long debate over the Affordable Care Act, Republicans farcically bemoaned the “rushed” process that consumed months of public hearings.) In this case, however, the indictment is undeniable. The House cemented the bill’s majority support with a series of last-minute changes whose effects have not been digested. The Congressional Budget Office has not even had time to calculate how many millions of Americans would lose health insurance, nor by how many trillions of dollars the deficit would increase.

The heedlessness of the process is an indication of its underlying fanaticism. The members of the Republican majority are behaving not like traditional conservatives but like revolutionaries who, having seized power, believe they must smash up the old order as quickly as possible before the country recognizes what is happening.

House Republicans are fully aware of the political and economic risks of this endeavor. Cutting taxes for the affluent is unpopular, and cutting Medicaid is even more so. That is why, instead of proudly proclaiming what the bill will accomplish, they are pretending it will do neither. House Republicans spent months warning of the political dangers of cutting Medicaid, a program that many of their own constituents rely on. The party’s response is to fall back on wordplay, pretending that their scheme of imposing complex work requirements, which are designed to cull eligible recipients who cannot navigate the paperwork burden, will not throw people off the program—when that is precisely the effect they are counting on to produce the necessary savings.

The less predictable dangers of their plan are macroeconomic. The bill spikes the deficit, largely because it devotes more money to lining the pockets of lawyers and CEOs than it saves by immiserating fast-food employees and ride-share drivers. Massive deficit spending is not always bad, and in some circumstances (emergencies, or recessions) it can be smart and responsible. In the middle of an economic expansion, with a large structural deficit already built into the budget, it is deeply irresponsible.

In recent years, deficit spending has been a political free ride. With interest rates high and rising, the situation has changed. Higher deficits oblige Washington to borrow more money, which can force it to pay investors higher interest rates to take on its debt, which in turn increases the deficit even more, as interest payments (now approaching $1 trillion a year) swell. The market could absorb a new equilibrium with a higher deficit, but that resolution is hardly assured. The compounding effect of higher debt leading to higher interest rates leading to higher debt can spin out of control.

House Republicans have made clear they are aware of both the political and the economic dangers of their plan, because in the recent past, they have repeatedly warned about both. Their willingness to take them on is a measure of their profound commitment.

And while the content of their beliefs can be questioned, the seriousness of their purpose cannot. Congressional Republicans are willing to endanger their hold on power to enact policy changes they believe in. And what they believe—what has been the party’s core moral foundation for decades—is that the government takes too much from the rich, and gives too much to the poor.

[–] jayambi@lemmy.world 61 points 2 days ago (3 children)

By reading this, i had two thoughts:

  1. Someday soon, America will burn.

  2. The rest of the world should make a Blacklist of all those criminals who are robbing the working class so they cannot go anywhere exept from burning in the hell they created.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Goretantath@lemm.ee 35 points 2 days ago

It also has a bit where judges cant hold people in contempt anymore.

[–] billbasher@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago

Wow. Fuck these republicans and fuck the people that voted for them

[–] goldenquetzal@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

Hakeem Jeffries and anyone else thinking we are ever going to have fair elections again are Fing morons.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 109 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Our country is being robbed, our futures stolen

[–] My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The floodwaters can only be dammed so long before breaking free. Whether that happens via controlled release of pressure or a disastrous blow out is up to the people with the regulatory power. Their failure to address the tide can only end in their painful ruin. For their sake, they better have fast legs if they don't grow some hearts.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SnarkoPolo@lemm.ee 85 points 1 day ago (19 children)

Of course, this is going to affect the working class first and worst. But stay with me here.

My wife and I are what you'd call upper middle class. Thanks to our college education, union jobs in public agencies, and mostly being smart with money, our assets are not meager.

Are you like me? Don't think you're exempt. They're coming for our assets too. They want all of us living paycheck to paycheck, begging our employers to not fire us.

What I'm saying is, the class struggle is everyone's struggle. If you're not a billionaire, you're at risk. Act like it.

[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (6 children)

The #1 issue for all of us is Us versus Them. That's it. There's 1000 of them and 350 million of us.

[–] TwinTitans@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It is, but the narrative they want it “us vs immigrants”. Think of how long they’ve been rage baiting people with this, it’s nuts.

Keep focus, it’s the 1%.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] CatDogL0ver@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Exactly. I don't think I am poor but in there eyes, I am dirt poor. Anyone can't afford a seat at their table are at peril.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 59 points 1 day ago (23 children)

And yet we get banned for talking about the solution.

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 56 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

I really want this to be it. I want a big enough mass of freak conservative boomers to die off of old age and for the republicans to finally push everyone else hard enough that this country finally fucking snaps and swings left so hard that Reagan's grave belches black smoke for a month. I hope we swing left so hard that all the Fox News assholes run bawling off to Russia, all the neoliberal dickheads move to their neoliberal paradise of [some offshore oil rig], and we end up fixing all kinds of shit that's been broken for basically my entire life.

I know it won't; we'll just get a bunch of working class republicans standing around the wreckage and mumbling "can you imagine how much worse it would have been under Biden?" to each other.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

I want a big enough mass of freak conservative boomers to die off of old age and for the republicans to finally push everyone else hard enough that this country finally fucking snaps and swings left so hard that Reagan’s grave belches black smoke for a month.

Look at Mike Johnson's face--he's not dying for a long long time. Get over the idea that evil people are all old and you just need to wait for them to die, it's not going to happen. New evil ones are born every day, they exist in every generation, they've been with us forever and will be with us forever.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] octopus_ink@slrpnk.net 49 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

And let's not forget. Tens of millions of magas, having witnessed the past few months, would vote him in again tomorrow if we gave them a do-over.

As furious as I am at the oligarchs taking over every last thing, evil greedy bastards gonna evil greedy bastard.

That anger pales in comparison to my rage at the tens of millions of my countrymen who dragged the rest of us into this fucking hellscape with them for no reasons beyond:

-Ignorance

-Hate

The ratio of those varies from maga voter to maga voter, but IME those are pretty much the only two reasons I see for why they have condemened not only themselves but also the entire rest of the nation to life in this emerging dystopia. They've already killed people in this country with their vote, and the numbers will only go up.

Yet somehow we all still have to go to work and get along every day, but I truly don't care if I never see or speak to a single Trump voter ever again, and that includes so-called friends and family members. They are all dead to me, or as dead as familial and work obligations will allow. Every last one can choke on a bag of dicks and razor blades as far as I care.

Edit - I beg you, random silent downvoter, to explain to me where I've gone wrong in the above.

collapsed inline media

[–] skeezix@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You summarize it perfectly. I am so disheartened by my fellow countrymen. So put off that I left the country and have no intention of ever returning there to live. When I see someone like Klepper interview maga, it is always driven home just how absolutely stupid and ignorant maga are. It's really no wonder he got elected again. trump is indeed the symptom not the disease. I think the Leopards Ate My Face communities do a grave injustice because I see such communities giving people the false impresssion that maga is "realizing" something. That couldn't be further from the truth. Many of my progressive friends are stuck in the "surely they're all waking up", "surely he wouldn't try to do that", "surely he wouldn't get elected again" cycle.

I believe there is a third reason in addition to ignorance and hate: tribalism. whether it's their religious tribe, or racial tribe, or sexuality tribe, conservatives tend to embrace tribalism more than anyone else. To them there are in groups and out groups. In groups that the law protects but does not bind, and out groups that the law binds but does not protect.

Ignorance, tribalism, hate, xenophobia, intolerance have always been able to take root in the minds of the weak. But when the oligarchs realized that the ignoranti could be a powerful tool, they became a product. Those millions of maga people you mention have been and are groomed continually to be tools for enabling the transfer of wealth. They are groomed with fear, misinformation, manipulation, appeals to tribalism, and appeals to uncertainty. They are groomed so effectively that they groom themselves and their own children.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

The largest upward transfer of wealth in history... so far.

Not counting the ones during Covid or 2008.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 33 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Hey, yanks, until your centre right party (the Democrats) is willing to go all in and run candidates at all levels of government on the slogan of "The Largest Downward Transfer of Wealth in American History", your far right party (the Republicans) will keep repeating this. But if it makes you feel better, go back to blaming Muslims in Michigan or whatever.

[–] kokolowlander@lemm.ee 15 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The swing voters in the US is dumb as a brick.

They care a lot more about "culture war" issues.

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemm.ee 14 points 1 day ago

"Swing Voter" == "Too Embarrassed To Admit Being A Republican"

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 day ago (4 children)

So make "tax the rich" a culture war thing. Left populism is a winning strategy too.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nthavoc@lemmy.today 11 points 1 day ago

The democrats are in on it too and it doesn't matter how many candidates they have politically aligned with the public's best interest. I keep saying this but the only way to break out of this loop is for both parties to split and take a large chunk of resources with them with they do. They also need to eliminate the "CEO" position for any party and all vote for the primary candidates instead of making arbitrary decisions. I get it, you need a leadership for housekeeping reasons, but the current RNC and DNC CEO's are not at all about housekeeping for the greater good. All of it is lip service while they take tax-free "political contributions" from all those shady "SuperPACS" . This is all wishful thinking and I'm just hear along for the ride in the billionaire made hand basket to hell.

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 30 points 1 day ago
[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 27 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

The French public would have a called a general strike at minimum while the AmeriKans take it in the ass.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 22 points 19 hours ago
[–] SanicHegehog@lemm.ee 20 points 2 days ago
[–] twice_hatch@midwest.social 19 points 18 hours ago

"Upward transfer"

"Theft" is the word

[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 17 points 2 days ago (10 children)

Guess I'll give up on everything, not have any kids and shoot myself at age 60,... unironically. I have the gun already.

[–] takeda@lemm.ee 33 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This is not end of the world, history is full of bad moments and we got out of them.

We need people to join protests to help change things, not kill themselves. If we accept that we have no power, we will have no power.

https://www.mobilize.us/indivisible/

https://fiftyfifty.one/

https://maydaymovementusa.org/

[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Oh I will, all the way up to age 60. I'm not going to wait quietly for old age. I have lots of time to flick off conservatives.

But do I actually have any hope at all?

nope!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Are we beyond the point of protests yet? Our politicians are actively taking affirmative steps to avoid listening to them.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

You could do so much more good with that gun.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

That's most millenial Americans' retirement plans.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] breecher@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 day ago

Considering the entire history of the US is one big upwards transfer of wealth, that is really saying something.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago
[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 2 days ago

This bill also fully bans Medicaid Gender Affirming Care, adults and all.

[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That's what they said about his last tax bill.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 day ago

The largest upward transfer of wealth so far...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 10 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

For republicans, “wealth transfer” is a dirty phrase if used in any shape or form that leans towards fairness, a level playing field, and equality. However, handing money to the already wealthy and fuck everyone else is perfectly acceptable wealth transfer.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›