this post was submitted on 14 May 2025
-16 points (34.6% liked)

Technology

69985 readers
4825 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 74 points 7 hours ago (4 children)

Most drivers prefer plugging in at home or nearby, especially overnight. While this offers convenience, it creates problems for the power grid, which is already under stress during peak evening hours.

Wildly misleading title. Overnight charging doesn't pose a problem, charging in the evening may pose a problem. All EVs today have scheduled charging so you can plug it in when you get home but it won't charge until nighttime where load and price are low. This is a non-issue, it has already been solved for everyone but the most dense idiot consumers.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 46 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

it has already been solved for everyone but the most dense idiot consumers.

So we’re doomed then

[–] Lembot_0002@lemm.ee 1 points 5 hours ago

IDKFA can save the day!

[–] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 10 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

You're missing that the researchers recommend charging during daytime business hours, which means people who use EVs to drive to work would need public or workplace provided chargers to accommodate this.

Setting a timer to charge around noon wouldn't help if you're parked at your job with no chargers nearby.

[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

You just need to avoid peak evening hours to avoid overloading the grid, and a timer set to start at 1am solves this perfectly fine.

Depending on where you live, night time is also lowest load on the grid.

[–] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 4 points 4 hours ago

I'm not sure you're talking about the same thing the paper is about. The overall load is lower, but the mix of power types is different.

Specifically, in California, there's a HUGE difference in power generation types overnight than during the day. There's excess capacity until the sun goes down due to solar. If you look ahead to everyone driving EVs, and then assume that everyone charges at night, then the power problem is completely different than what it is today.

[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

So the researchers are saying there is more load during mid-day but there is also excess capacity due to solar, and that is better than charging at 3am with low load but also low generation from renewables?

[–] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 3 points 4 hours ago

That's how I read the article, yes.

It's a little confusing, because they seem to also be speculating on how power generation and load will be in the future as well as people's charging habits.

Have to start scaring the public with “ev bad” stories so banning them will be a more supported option.

[–] Amoxtli@thelemmy.club 0 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

You obviously missed the context entirely.

[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 16 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

This absolutely depends on your location. My power company recommends charging at night, when the grid isn't as strained. My area primarily uses hydro and wind, and this article seems to be talking about solar which is not very efficient here.

Much of the study is focused on the area around Stanford, which has access to a large amount of solar power nearby, so it would make more sense there.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 16 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Well I got distracted by work and such so now everyone has already said this, but fuck it, here's my version.


Recent research shows charging habits are more complex than expected. Most drivers prefer plugging in at home or nearby, especially overnight. While this offers convenience, it creates problems for the power grid, which is already under stress during peak evening hours.

So schedule the charging to start at off-peak hours, such as 9PM.

In contrast, shifting charging to daytime hours, particularly during periods of abundant solar energy, could alleviate grid stress and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

This presumes your local grid makes use of solar. This is not a significant source of power in my area.

“Policymakers should consider utility rates that encourage day charging and incentivize investment in charging infrastructure to shift drivers from home to work for charging,” Rajagopal stated.

First, where I live they already charge more during peak hours than non-peak hours, which incentivizes charging at home after peak hours.

Where I charge at work, the charging is free, but you are not guaranteed a spot. So charging at work would mean anxiety about getting to charge at all. Also, not everywhere has free charging.

There is an existing, simple solution to the problem and it is not to discourage charging at home.

[–] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 11 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Basically they want people to charge during the daytime when solar power is available, instead of in the evening when the grid is strained by higher demand and lack of renewable energy.

EVs have timers in them to prevent them from charging during peak demand or high electric cost hours. My power company charges triple rates from 2pm-7pm weekdays. We just have the EV timer set to not charge during that window.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

My power company charges triple rates from 2pm-7pm weekdays.

Holy crap! Triple for those hours?!

I have a western facing home solar array, for me that is most of my prime power generating hours (besides winter months, of course). 2:30pm to 3pm is my peak generation of the day. I just checked my numbers and I'm still generating more than my house consumes until about 8pm. This will change a bit when it gets hotter and the AC is running more.

[–] kaeurennetwo@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

It's making people gay at an alarming rate!

[–] kaeurennetwo@lemmy.world -2 points 6 hours ago

What's that

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 2 points 5 hours ago

Then give financial incentive to do so.

[–] Amoxtli@thelemmy.club 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

The study the article is talking about, is a possible solution to cover California's solar energy glut problem during the day, because the state doesn't have enough batteries. It is a case study. In trying to do that, it may create other problems, such as infrastructure to get people to charge their cars during the day while they work. This means employers must pay or get somebody to pay for chargers at the work place, adding onto more costs onto the employee and/or employer. Nighttime charging may be cheaper and more convenient, but remember, the study wants you to capture all the wonder solar power during the day, not use potential green house gases from natural gas at night. The more complexity, the more problems you have.