this post was submitted on 13 May 2025
150 points (95.7% liked)

politics

24548 readers
2724 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For the most part, nominees aren't subject to filibuster; the most that the Democrats can do is to slow the pace of approvals to a crawl, which they should have been doing from day 1. Next best time to do it for every nominee is today.

all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Curious_Canid@lemmy.ca 108 points 1 month ago

It would have been nice if he'd already been slowing the nominees over their lack of qualifications and their fascist ideologies.

[–] death@infosec.pub 57 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Fascism will surely be defeated by "slowing the nomination process". Well, I guess it's something. Sigh.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

At least he's stopped happily voting for it.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

He's talked big and caved before.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If the midterms were held tomorrow I think the GOP would lose their majority (in at least one chamber). They need time to implement policies and rules that will either make voting harder or outright pointless (state legislators have floated the idea of straight up overriding the votes of their citizens). They have lots of time to fuck shit up, but they need that time all the same.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

If the midterms were held tomorrow I think the GOP would lose their majority (in at least one chamber)

I dunno. I bet democrats could find a way to fuck things up between now and tomorrow.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 31 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Would he act this way if the plane was offered by e.g. ~~Taiwan~~ Israel?

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A bribe is a bribe is a bribe, even if we can only see one of the quid and the quo.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

No, I mean, because it's given by Qatar and he's israel's paladin. Maybe this one finally got him suspicious

[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago (3 children)

This was the final straw for him? Really??

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

My exact thought. I can not stand the current Democratic Party. They are deporting and imprisoning American citizens without due process and the straw that broke the camels back is a fucking jet.

[–] ButtermilkBiscuit@lemm.ee 11 points 1 month ago

I'm sure it benefits Israel in some way or he wouldn't be doing it at all.

[–] twice_hatch@midwest.social 5 points 1 month ago

Maybe he wanted that jet lol

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemm.ee 27 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Strongly worded letter to follow.

[–] Prandom_returns@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

With FOUR tough questions this time.

[–] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 15 points 1 month ago

Feckless Schumer

[–] Auntievenim@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Let's not get this confused, he is doing this now because Trump negotiated a hostage release and undercut Israel in the negotiation. It couldn't be more obvious unless he said "the only acceptable course of action is to sell the plane and send the money to Israel for weapons"

Thanks for finally doing the right thing five months late. Not really promising, but if you at least arent lying about this that'll be one good thing this congress has done in their lives.

[–] harmsy@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What's he going to do? Write another letter?

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Make a few milquetoast gestures, then completely cave instead of listening to what his angry constituents are saying like a spineless little shitbag?

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I really hope AOC primaries him

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 8 points 1 month ago

I hope all of these clowns get primaried. In fact, getting primaried should just be a given for every candidate. People are denied more choice otherwise.

[–] Redditsux@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Ground Chuck, it's a little too late to curry favor.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Will it be a yet another strongly worded letter?

[–] echo@lemmings.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not stop them or anything useful... just slow them; maybe keep them out of the news cycle entirely.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

There aren't enough Democrats in the Senate to actually stop them. Just slow things down so much that the Republicans need to pick and choose which ones they care enough to push through.

[–] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 5 points 1 month ago

Seems like that would’ve been a GREAT strategy 100-some odds days ago.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It sure is neat how republicans can reliably stop democrats no matter how large a majority democrats have, but it never seems to work the other way.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They couldn't during 2021-2022 when Democrats had 50 seats in the Senate plus the VP. You could pass what the most conservative Democrat was willing to vote for then, so long as it was a budget reconciliation bill.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Which is why the national minimum wage is no longer 7.25 and BBB passed.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

BBB became the Inflation Reduction Act. Its what Manchin would vote for.

The most conservative Democrat is far more conservative than you or I.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

And centrists ran on the inflation reduction act in 2024, with no shame at all for what they stole from us. Because killing everything that had a direct tangible benefit to voters (except lowering the price of 10 drugs for boomers on medicare) was democrats' accomplishment.

Go ahead. Tell me how all the corporate handouts in the law will help individuals. Trickle down economics is so great.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It was far better than anything we got before in terms of environmental impact, even while not being enough:

collapsed inline media

The Republican effort to repeal it is (rightly) going to to be a real disaster, costing us not just a liveable future, but a lot of jobs in the near term.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I didn't mention environmental impact, now did I? I thought I was talking about direct individual benefits. You know, shit that makes a measurable impact on people's lives before the election? Something we can point to when people point out that things suck? Not just "be grateful you don't have it worse like other countries." Which is shit messaging to people who aren't making it, no matter how much it resonates with the out of touch overpaid consultants that control party messaging.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Even there, Manchin was a major problem. Almost all the Democrats wanted stuff like an expanded child tax credit, but Manchin announced that if parents had money, they'd all go out and buy meth, so he insisted on its removal from the bill before he would vote for it.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If it wasn't manchin, someone else would have rotated in.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Or...the actual problem is that every single republican is opposed to doing things that help Americans, so with a 50/50 Senate, it took buying off only one Democrat to force stuff out

The actual path to good policy is more and better Democrats. Enough that the failings of one or three can't sink legislation

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The problem is "no matter who" leaves no room for better democrats.

Which is why the party is basically oops all manchins.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Nah. Its that of any large group, there is a risk somebody is bought off. So having a few more legislators more than the minimum protects you from that.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Nah, we can still move to the right, just ignore that.

[–] MolecularCactus1324@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh boy, that’ll show em.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Unfortunately gumming up the Senate is about the only tool a minority has

[–] MolecularCactus1324@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He should’ve been doing that ages ago and with more intensity

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

For sure. But I'll appreciate seeing it happen now instead of never

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I would define right now as for all intents and purposes essentially "never" in this context.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Unfortunately, democrats only use that tool when they have the majority and only talk about using it when they don't.

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago

But how will This Help with the Democratic Plan of Do Nothing And Let People Suffer?

[–] Nay@feddit.nl 2 points 1 month ago

Get 'em Shumdawg!