this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
642 points (96.1% liked)

Canada

8766 readers
2369 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] boke@sh.itjust.works 177 points 21 hours ago (9 children)

This isn’t a show of force, it’s a demonstration for Canada who is planning to buy a number of these submarines from France.

[–] Evkob@lemmy.ca 75 points 20 hours ago

You're right, thanks for adding context. I'm immediately suspicious when a picture is posted with no accompanying news article, and my search wasn't turning up any articles, only social media links.

Here's a French article about it.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 29 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Australia watching on with regret.

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 17 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Morrison is such a dickhead.

[–] Gronk@aussie.zone 12 points 13 hours ago (5 children)

Morrison knew what he was doing, the sub deal was to poison the chalice before Labor gained the majority.

Unfortunately for the walking sack of salmonella and shitty curry, his wrangler (Murdoch) managed to sway the election enough to get the LNP back in power.

I have actually met Morrison in person once (friends of friends of friends) and he is a fucking moron but JFC he's at least a brain cell or two ahead of Dutton

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 7 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

We knew that BEFORE the election and yet elected the LNP anyway, fuck voters.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 7 points 7 hours ago

right?! gawwwwwwd we’re so fucking captured

[–] yannic@lemmy.ca 14 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Yes, this old news is about a nuclear-powered attack submarine, not necessarily a submarine that can nuclear-attack.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 8 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Lamp Oil, Rope, Nuclear Subs? You want it? It's yours, my friend. As looong as you have enough Euros.

[–] Isaac@waterloolemmy.ca 11 points 11 hours ago

Khajit has wares, if you have coin.

collapsed inline media

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 8 points 5 hours ago

Regardless, it's presence makes a statement that Canada is not alone.

Though I'd be cool if it was stationed at Miquelon for a few months.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ShakingMyCane@lemmy.ca 137 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

France manages to get a sub to us before the UK even deigns to comment. That says it all. Merci beacoup!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] myersguy@lemmy.simpl.website 113 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Evkob@lemmy.ca 110 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (4 children)

Hijacking the top comment to let people know this isn't in response to any American threats, this is Naval Group, a French naval defense company, showing off their submarine because Canada is looking to spend 60 billion on twelve submarines. The plans for this purchase were publicly announced on July 10, 2024.

Here's a French news article about the submarine, seeing as I couldn't seem to find any sources in English.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 40 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

I'll take both reasons as canon, thank you very much

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 14 points 14 hours ago

Naval Group, a French naval defense company

Ah shit, that's the same company Australia had a deal with to buy diesel subs, before our fuckwit former PM reneged on the deal to create AUKUS and buy American nuclear subs.

[–] evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world 7 points 20 hours ago (5 children)

Weird that they specify "conventionally powered" in the Canadian article since this is a nuclear powered sub.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 81 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

JT was just in France as one of his last acts as PM. Mere days later this bad boy shows up in a Halifax harbour. πŸ€”πŸ€”πŸ€” Merci a la belle France πŸ‡«πŸ‡·πŸ€πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦

[–] Isaac@waterloolemmy.ca 11 points 11 hours ago

Vive la France!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Typotyper@sh.itjust.works 75 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

Could have imagined this happening as little as 3 years ago.

An ally sending a nuclear deterrent into our waters as a message/warning to the US. This normally happens to countries like Iran or North Korea

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 46 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

Hey. Guess what? At the moment, we're the bad guys...

[–] XenGi@feddit.org 29 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

At the moment? When was there ever a time the US weren't the bad guys?

[–] YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH@infosec.pub 26 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Briefly the us was the good guys when we killed a bunch of slavers and then when we killed a bunch of fascists. Those were exceptions to the rule though.

[–] starshipHighwayman69@lemmy.ml 15 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Looks at founding fathers... Yeah killed the slavers. Puts blanket over Native Indians. Hides Chinese rail workers under rug. Renames Irish "Indentured workers"

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 8 points 15 hours ago

They also killed the Nazis, except for the ones that were useful, of course.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 18 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (5 children)

To be accurate, this is a nuclear propelled attack submarine. It does not carry nuclear warheads and is not what we normally call a "nuclear deterrent".

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 12 points 16 hours ago

Still hasn’t happened. This was a sales pitch for a Canadian defence contract.

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 49 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

Let's go! France is here to protect Canada!

[–] Typotyper@sh.itjust.works 21 points 21 hours ago

Na, they’re just finishing the 7years war-round 2

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 8 points 18 hours ago

Idk about that. Other commenters have better explanations that aren't sensational.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 40 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

Would a french submarine wear its hat like this:

collapsed inline media

or like this:

collapsed inline media

[–] gibmiser@lemmy.world 18 points 21 hours ago

Asking the real questions

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 9 points 12 hours ago

The top one looks like he got hit on the head.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 33 points 13 hours ago

nuclear subs always give me gundam carrier ship vibes

[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (5 children)

The scale of these things is always fascinating. They're always much larger than I think they are.

For reference, I think that's a Suffren class, making it just shy of 100m, or a tad longer than a football field for my fellow Americans.

[–] qprimed@lemmy.ml 10 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

perchance, banana for scale?

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 9 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

It's a football field, Micheal. How big could it be, a banana?

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 7 points 21 hours ago

It's there, but hard to see.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] 0ndead@infosec.pub 17 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

β€œBring it” - France probably

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Hux@lemmy.ml 14 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Don’t tease me!

NOBODY backs an American Revolution like the French!

πŸ‡«πŸ‡·πŸ¦…πŸŽ†

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 12 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Important note: The "Nuclear" in "Nuclear attack submarine" means that it is powered by a nuclear reactor. It does not refer to its armament. An "attack" submarine means it is designed to attack ships and other submarines and these are typically not capable of carrying and launching ICBMs. Nuclear-armed deterrent submarines are called Ballistic Missile Submarines.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] peteyestee@feddit.org 11 points 22 hours ago
[–] Ceedoestrees@lemmy.world 10 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Finally. Letting the French keep a little bit of Canada pays off.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 8 points 20 hours ago (3 children)
[–] Evkob@lemmy.ca 15 points 19 hours ago

Here's a French article about it. It's not a show of force, it's a naval defense company showing off their submarine in the hopes of being granted a 60 billion dollar contract for 12 submarines that the Canadian government announced last summer.

[–] KingOfSleep@lemmy.ca 11 points 20 hours ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] herrcaptain@lemmy.ca 7 points 21 hours ago

During a period with seemingly very little good news in the world, I really needed this. Assuming it was done for the optics it conveys, it's some much needed reassurance that our allies actually have our back. Granted, we're still absolutely fucked in the short term if the worst happens, it's still nice to see.

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί