this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
1431 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

66067 readers
4693 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zzyzx@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

It's really annoying to me that Firefox doesn't seem to work well on my chromebook, so I'm stuck with Chrome until I need a new computer...

[–] John@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Iamaquantummechanic@lemmy.world 7 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Have never used Chrome. Firefox is very good. I had 5-6 years when I preferred Opera, but since 2014, I've been using Firefox exclusively.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SpiceDealer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Correct me if I'm wrong but extensions can still be installed manually correct?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] thisphuckinguy@lemmy.world 7 points 22 hours ago

That’s fine. Google can go fuck themselves

[–] kane@femboys.biz 7 points 21 hours ago

I stayed away from Chrome alternatives, as it had the best Canvas/HTML5 performance (Which oddly enough, was quite important for most of my browsing needs). However, this news means I will have to switch. Installed Firefox for my primary browsing needs, and a few Chromium-based ones to try out for specifically the aforementioned use case.

[–] ThaMunsta@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

I noticed they recently marked it deprecated or unsupported (i forget the wording) and tried to get me to remove it. I think it was even disabled automatically. I kinda saw this coming.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago

i was able to load it in a (not chrome) chromium-based browser without issue, just the notice across the addon's page.

the 'lite' version is also on there, seems to work 'ok'. adguard and a few others are also there--they must all be mv3, as only the full ubo has the warning notice on its page of those i checked.

all the mv3 ones run the risk of having updates rejected or delayed by google, especially if they contain code or filter updates (filters must be packed with the addon in mv3) to combat changes google makes to their own sites. firefox or a trusted customized build or maintained fork is the way to go now.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 6 points 23 hours ago

🎵So long, farewell, Auf Wiedersehen, goodbye.🎵

[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 5 points 23 hours ago

It’s funny how things work out. I had a Chromebook that couldn’t have Firefox installed. I heard that Chrome would remove ubo, my Chromebook died the following month. So I got a cheap laptop instead. The problem solved itself.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›