this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2025
2 points (100.0% liked)

Anarchism and Social Ecology

1958 readers
5 users here now

!anarchism@slrpnk.net

A community about anarchy. anarchism, social ecology, and communalism for SLRPNK! Solarpunk anarchists unite!

Feel free to ask questions here. We aspire to make this space a safe space. SLRPNK.net's basic rules apply here, but generally don't be a dick and don't be an authoritarian.

Anarchism

Anarchism is a social and political theory and practice that works for a free society without domination and hierarchy.

Social Ecology

Social Ecology, developed from green anarchism, is the idea that our ecological problems have their ultimate roots in our social problems. This is because the domination of nature and our ecology by humanity has its ultimate roots in the domination humanity by humans. Therefore, the solutions to our ecological problems are found by addressing our social and ecological problems simultaneously.

Libraries

Audiobooks

Quotes

Poetry and imagination must be integrated with science and technology, for we have evolved beyond an innocence that can be nourished exclusively by myths and dreams.

~ Murray Bookchin, The Ecology of Freedom

People want to treat ‘we’ll figure it out by working to get there’ as some sort of rhetorical evasion instead of being a fundamental expression of trust in the power of conscious collective effort.

~Anonymous, but quoted by Mariame Kaba, We Do This 'Til We Free Us

The end justifies the means. But what if there never is an end? All we have is means.

~Ursula K. Le Guin, The Lathe of Heaven

The assumption that what currently exists must necessarily exist is the acid that corrodes all visionary thinking.

~Murray Bookchin, "A Politics for the Twenty-First Century"

There can be no separation of the revolutionary process from the revolutionary goal. A society based on self-administration must be achieved by means of self-administration.

~Murray Bookchin, Post Scarcity Anarchism

In modern times humans have become a wolf not only to humans, but to all nature.

~Abdullah Öcalan

The ecological question is fundamentally solved as the system is repressed and a socialist social system develops. That does not mean you cannot do something for the environment right away. On the contrary, it is necessary to combine the fight for the environment with the struggle for a general social revolution...

~Abdullah Öcalan

Social ecology advances a message that calls not only for a society free of hierarchy and hierarchical sensibilities, but for an ethics that places humanity in the natural world as an agent for rendering evolution social and natural fully self-conscious.

~ Murray Bookchin

Network

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've been part of the online left for a while now, part of slrpnk about 2 months, and if there's one recurring experience that's both exhausting and revealing, it's trying to have good-faith discussions with self-identified Marxist-Leninists, the kind often referred to as "tankies." I use that term here not as a lazy insult nor to dehumanize, but to describe a particular kind of online personality: the ones who dogmatically defend Marx, Lenin, Stalin, and every so-called "existing socialist state" past or present, without room for nuance, critique, or even basic empathy. Not all Marxist-Leninists are like this. But these people, these tankies, show up in every thread, every debate, every conversation about liberation, and somehow it always turns into a predictable mess.

It usually goes like this: I make a statement that critiques authoritarianism or centralized power, and suddenly I'm being accused of parroting CIA talking points, being a liberal in disguise, or not being a "real leftist." One time, I said "Totalitarianism kills" — a simple, arguably uncontroversial point. What followed was a barrage of replies claiming that the term was invented by Nazis, that Hannah Arendt (who apparently popularized it, I looked it up and it turns out she didn't) was an anti-semite, and that even using the word is inherently reactionary. When I clarified that I was speaking broadly about state violence and authoritarian mechanisms, the same people just doubled down, twisting my words, inventing claims I never made, and eventually accusing me of being some kind of crypto-fascist. This wasn’t a one-off, it happens constantly.

If you've spent any time in these spaces, you know what I'm talking about. The conversations never stays on topic. It always loops back to defending state socialism, reciting quotes from Lenin, minimizing atrocities as "bourgeois propaganda" and dragging anarchism as naive or counter-revolutionary. It's like they’re playing from a script.

I’ve spent a lot of time trying to understand why these interactions feel so uniquely frustrating. And over time, I’ve started noticing recurring patterns in the kind of people who show up this way. Again, a disclaimer here: not everyone who defends Marx or Lenin online falls into these patterns. There are thoughtful, sincere, and principled MLs who engage in real, grounded discussions. But then there are these other types:

  1. The Theory Maximalist

This person treats political theory like scripture. They’ve read the texts (probably a lot of them) and they approach every conversation like a chance to prove their mastery. Everything becomes about citations, dialectics, and abstract arguments. When faced with real-world contradictions, their default move is to bury it under more theory. They mistake being well-read for being politically mature, and often completely miss the human, relational side of radical politics.

  1. The Identity Leftist

For this person, being a leftist isn’t about organizing or material change. It’s an identity. They call themselves a Marxist-Leninist the way someone else might call themselves a punk or a metalhead. Defending state socialism becomes a cultural performance. They’re less interested in the complexity of history than in being on the “correct side” of whatever aesthetic battle they’re fighting. Anarchists, to them, represent softness or chaos, and that’s a threat to the image they’ve built for themselves.

  1. The Terminally Online Subculturalist

This one lives in forums, Discords, or other niche Internet circles. Their entire political world is digital. They've likely never been to a union meeting, a mutual aid drive, or a community organizing session. All their knowledge of struggle is mediated through memes and screenshots. They treat ideology like a fandom and conflict like sport. They love the drama, the takedowns, the purity contests. The actual work of liberation? Irrelevant.

  1. The Alienated Intellectual

This person is often very smart, often very isolated, and clings to ideology as a way of making sense of the world. They’re drawn to strict political systems because it gives them order and meaning in a chaotic life. And while they might not be malicious, they often struggle to engage with disagreement without feeling personally attacked. For them, criticism of Marxism-Leninism can feel like an existential threat, because it destabilizes the fragile structure they’ve built to cope with life.

These types don’t describe everyone, and they’re not meant to be a diagnosis or a dismissal. They're patterns I’ve noticed. Ways that a political identity can become rigid, defensive, and disconnected from real-world struggle.

And here’s the thing that’s always struck me as particularly ironic: Let's face it, a lot of these people would absolutely hate to be part of real socialist organizing. Because the kind of organizing that builds power, the kind that helps people survive, defend themselves, and grow; it's messy, emotionally challenging, and full of conflict. It requires flexibility, listening, and compromise. It doesn’t work if everyone’s just quoting dead guys and calling each other traitors. Anarchist or not, actual socialist practice is grounded in real life, not in endless internet warfare.

That’s why this whole cycle feels so tragic. Because behind all the posturing, the purity tests, and the ideological gatekeeping, there’s a legit reason these people ended up here. Of all the ideologies in the world, they chose communism. Why? Probably because they hurt. Because they saw the ugliness of capitalism and wanted something better. Because, at some point, they were moved by the idea that we could live without exploitation.

And somewhere along the way, that desire got calcified into a set of talking points. It got buried under defensiveness and online clout games. The pain turned inward, and now they lash out at anyone who doesn’t match their script. That’s not an excuse. But it is something to hold with empathy.

I don’t write this to mock anyone. I write it because I want us to do better, recognize our differences and hopefully come to a fair conclusion. And Idk, I still believe we can. Ape together strong 💖

top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Personally I find their constant bad faith arguments tiring so I usually don't engage. Many campists have the right critique of the existing systems but are useless at knowing what to do to change it. Their best takes are usually to emulate socialist movements of the early 20th century like a cargo cult and hope if they do the same motions, it will magically lead to the same socialism (with them on the vanguard ofc). So ultimately worthless praxis built on stale rhetoric. It's telling that even the most "left unity" oriented campists manage to thoroughly alienating most of those they believe they should be united with.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It’s telling that even the most “left unity” oriented campists manage to thoroughly alienating most of those they believe they should be united with.

Every time they say left unity, it means "agree with us or you're ignored."

You don't want to have a state when where done? What about left unity! It'll go away in 5, 10 years tops.

You think having labor camps makes us as bad as capitalists? That's silly, what happened to left unity?

Every time an anarchist group works with a state socialist group, they are often the last ones removed when the Statists can secure enough of a foothold without them.

Every. Time. I might be willing to work with them to get something removed but if they want to just swap the flag of the state instead of abolishing it, they just want to be the person who stomps on the faces of the workers they claim to support.

[–] Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

You think having labor camps makes us as bad as capitalists? That's silly, what happened to left unity?

Exactly this. It makes me more inclined to think all of them are Russian troll accounts sent to further divide us rather than actual people. And if they're actual people, I still very much don't find them worthy of engaging with.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I have noticed how they often use identical tactics to the Alt-Right movement in the USA, as described masterfully in Innuendo Studios' The Alt Right Playbook. As such, I've started thinking of tankies as a kind of Alt-Left, where facts matter little to none and instead feelings are supreme - though exclusively theirs, while yours count for little (although ironically not none, bc cruelty is the point).

And since algorithms that foster "engagement" tend to make this argumentation style more prevalent, it is becoming more prominent all over the world.

Sadly, it's fairly prominent in Lemmy as well, though tbf, we who came here from Reddit joined their space, not the other way around. This is why supporting independent development of software such as PieFed and Mbin is so crucial, bc otherwise authoritarianism seeps into everything. E.g. Lemmy has a modlog but no modmail, no notification sent to inform the recipient of a moderation action, no ability to enquire or dispute it even if you somehow find out about it - bc the modlog simply says it was done by a "mod" - and therefore Lemmy is actually somehow more authoritian than Reddit itself was!?!?!?!? (Caveat: admins have near total freedom, at the cost of potentially great efforts required to modify the codebase, and mods have elevated privileges as well, but for the end user... it is much the same, at least with regard to a specific community - they can take what it offers, or else leave).

What makes the Threadiverse fantastic and worth visiting is its userbase. Highly ironically then, what makes the Threadiverse toxic AF is its userbase. 🙃 (So many people over on r/RedditAlternatives saying how they could not tolerate it...) Thus, blocking it is then, with people who use such bad faith arguments chief among my own prioritization for such. (Btw it's not really possible to fully block all users from a specific instance on Lemmy - that feature would have far better been named as a "community mute" imho - unless you use the Sync or Connect app, switch to PieFed, or delve into making Ublock filters or creating your own instance to defederate them, none of them particularly easy to do, for a mainstream non-technical normie, who might otherwise be a fantastic content creator if the Threadiverse hadn't decided to run them off with its high level of toxicity.)

[–] Zirconium@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I've had a tankie tell me alt right playbook is Nazi propaganda before

[–] Seleni@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Wow. That’s either some serious head-up-the-ass or a depressing lack of listening comprehension.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago

"Everything the other side does is wrong, while my own side is incapable of doing wrong." While somehow at the same time, "bOtH sIdEs SaMe". It sounds tribal to me... yet what do I know 🤔.

[–] kuato@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Links or it didn’t happen.

[–] Zirconium@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah if you can recover my comment and its replies. https://sh.itjust.works/comment/2866047 And if you go to my shit just works account forgive my immaturity and bad arguments, I've grown a lot since then

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I've been having a decent time here. sure there is an asshole here and there but that's just GIFT for ya. the threadiverse feels like reddit back when it didn't suck

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago

The users here are definitely a higher quality than Reddit.

Or much lower, depending on where you go. Your instance is defederated from ~95% of the worst of the bad faith tankie posts though, so your recent experience is a success story that blocking such works to help people enjoy themselves here!

In contrast, I almost left the Threadiverse myself, after being trolled in both Hexbear.net and lemmygrad.ml (again, both of which slrpnk.net is defederated from) by making innocuous comments (I thought) yet receiving spam replies for WEEKS and WEEKS afterwards. Tbf that is kinda the entire purpose of ChapoTrapHouse@hexbear.net - to dunk on lib takes (or even ones not leftist enough) - but a new person (me!) wouldn't know that by arriving at a random post by browsing All, which doesn't show the sidebar text anywhere before you have a chance to reply in a comment. I would rather not use social media entirely than have to constantly put up with such.

So instead I switched instances, getting rid of lemmygrad.ml, then petitioned the new one to defederate from Hexbear.net, which was successful, then switched to PieFed which allows me to block all users from any instance I choose without requiring admin support, and thereby blocked lemmy.ml. I managed to get rid of the entire Big Three in my feed! And yes it does make experiencing the Threadiverse much better 😊.

[–] Diva@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

On the alt-right playbook, at the end of the day its mostly an analysis of fascism as an analysis of rhetoric. I would argue that I've see most of these strategies used by people of every single tendency. I haven't caught up since they returned from hiatus, but ironically the way they're presented would be something I would point to as an example of #1, announcing rhetorical devices authoritatively like you're reading from scripture or something.

If anything since the first run of alt-right playbook the alt right has just won and become the right.

[–] millie@beehaw.org 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Honestly, a good portion of them probably are the alt right. For some reason leftists on Lemmy have been taken in by this idea that everyone they talk to who purports to be a leftist must be taken at their word in good faith, even if everything they say literally sounds like a right-wing parody of leftism.

The fact that this vulnerability exists necessitates that we assume it's being used.

Why did the economist walk straight past a $1000 bill sitting in the middle of the sidewalk? Because if it had been there someone would have already picked it up.

It would be absolutely absurd to assume that no conservatives are cosplaying as leftists spouting exactly the stuff they accuse leftists of spouting and doing everything they can to disrupt any form of leftist solidarity. It's a $1000 bill sitting in the middle of the sidewalk that we can literally watch them picking up if we're not too willfully naive to acknowledge that it's happening.

Would you leave a secure server open with the password to the root account literally on the front page? No? Then why is anyone leaving this vulnerability wide open and pretending it isn't?

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago

I think you just described the genesis of Hexbear:-D.

[–] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 weeks ago

Why did the economist walk straight past a $1000 bill sitting in the middle of the sidewalk? Because if it had been there someone would have already picked it up.

y- you do understand the joke is that the economist is wrong here? The invisible hand of the market is a lie designed to justify capitalism and its highly inefficient hierarchical exploitation-based modes of organization.

The free market is not efficient. Capital owners make catastrophic errors in judgment that cause them to miss out on billions of dollars. Most profitable things do not happen. There are no anti-gun liberals flooding NRA meetings to get them to vote for gun legislation. There are no billionaires investing in walkable neighborhoods. Voters en masse vote to impoverish themselves and are genuinely surprised when it happens.

The USSR was not a CIA plot to make the USA turn away from communism. Millions of people genuinely believed in its "leftist" state even as it caused mass starvation through its incompetence, and tens of thousands of westerners hung on Pravda's every word. I won't deny the possibility that there are some trolls, but there is no need for that hypothesis when it comes to most Lemmy users.

[–] squirrel@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago

Of all the ideologies in the world, they chose communism. Why? Probably because they hurt. Because they saw the ugliness of capitalism and wanted something better. Because, at some point, they were moved by the idea that we could live without exploitation. [...] The pain turned inward, and now they lash out at anyone who doesn’t match their script. That’s not an excuse. But it is something to hold with empathy.

I wish I could easily subscribe to your call for empathy. The reason why I can't is because I have seen so many tankies deny the pain of others. It's not just the historical revisionism and the denial of Stalinist atrocities, but denying that people in the here and now are suffering like they do. Often this was tied to them insisting that they had every right to abuse others, because they themselves were suffering from capitalism. They completely failed to acknowledge that everyone around them was suffering under the very same conditions.

And there is the crux of the issue: One unspoken, implicit tenet of their beliefs is the denying others the same humanity they claim to uphold and represent. They demand to be accepted and their behavior to be tolerated, but will not grant the same basic rights to others.
The same notion allows them to deny the humanity of victims of Stalinist and Maoist terror.

And that's why I have a hard time to show them empathy, because I know they will not show the same empathy towards me.

[–] honeynut@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

those miserable fucks are mocking this thread https://hexbear.net/post/4671954?sort=Top

keep an eye out for brigaders (I see at almost a dozen sketchy comments here already) and report anyone you even get a whiff of being tankie alt. Even mild tankie apologetics or sympathy shouldn't be tolerated or else they start thinking this is a safe space for them.

[–] banan67@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 month ago

Yea, I skimmed through the comments. Yikes. Really just proves my point that they take these criticisms like a shot to the chest.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

LMAO, my meme I made a bit back is ever relevant

collapsed inline media

"ThEy jUsT DonT wAnT To reAD [Theory]"

collapsed inline media

[–] SparroHawc@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

I like how they respond to the first part of the sentence (they've read texts) and act like that is the entirety of the critique, despite including the second part in their quote.

[–] punkisundead@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 month ago

As described by OOP, they just take parts out of context and think they somehow "won" the debate.

[–] fakir@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

I've had similar experiences - endless tiring bad faith discussions. I sincerely believe market socialism is a realistic step we can take to improve human condition, but they seem convinced against it and hell bent on 'revolution'. It's clearly a cult with group think, they've arrived at their conclusions by reading theory, not from personal experience, self awareness, empathy & logic.

[–] locahosr443@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Sometimes it's hard to believe these people are real. It almost makes more sense they exist to make the left appear completely toxic to everyone, including left leaning people.

I hope that's the case anyway and all the above is just a lot of over analysing, cos man, they suck.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

self-identified Marxist-Leninists, the kind often referred to as “tankies.”

Tankie is a term that NAFO bodysnatcher nazi US empire lovers use to criticize those who oppose US empire's geopolitical extortion. Naziism is simply superior to Russia's self defense needs, or China's humanist abundance strategy. There is no need to support Marxism to be called a tankie. US puppet democracy simply must be considered supreme, and no matter how distant the human rights abuses (that far pale in comparison to even current US evil) of those resisting US evil, you are a tankie for not favouring US naziism and genocide.

tankie is simply a brainwashing insult meant to uphold the illusory "good vs evil historical narrative the audience learned in grade school from pledge of allegiance"

Identity Leftist

It is common in anarchist circles for feminist/queer supremacists, identity pride, to view anarchism as a platform to launch a new fascist order where their identity values rule supreme. The evil of religion/church is identity pride that replaces "thou shalt not kill" principles. Where Marxism is labour identity supremacism, that too becomes a basis for fascism.

Regardless of Citizen's united, money has always been speech. So, corporatist/oligarchist/capitalist supremacy can spend on divisivness to grant them supremacism. Zionism has always been the Empire's friend, but it was ultimate alliance point for oligarchy in last election.

Freedom dividends/UBI is far more important than democracy. It permits fair/fairer markets, where labour is not priced based on the desperation level of labour, and returns on capital reflects the opportunity for competition. UBI is less about wealth redistribution as it is power redistribution. Less of a master, is far more achievable than a vacuum opportunity for new masters.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

No, "Tankie" has a clear definition and is mostly used correctly around here

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tankie

Tankie is a pejorative label generally applied to authoritarian communists, especially those who support or defend acts of repression by such regimes, their allies, or deny the occurrence of the events thereof.

And that is demonstrated by, known hardcore tankies, .ml admins through censorship and bans of those critical of their favored Authoritarian regimes:

https://lemmy.world/post/28480760

https://lemmy.world/post/28481615

https://lemmy.world/post/28482147

https://lemmy.world/post/28480936

https://lemmy.world/post/28482273

https://lemmy.world/post/28481272

https://lemmy.world/post/28481064

https://lemmy.world/post/27674360

https://lemmy.world/post/27674117

https://lemmy.world/post/27673934

https://lemmy.world/post/27673724

https://lemmy.world/post/27577337

https://lemmy.world/post/27378634

https://lemmy.world/post/27346630

https://lemmy.world/post/27341283

https://lemmy.world/post/27288224

https://lemmy.world/post/27156418

https://lemmy.world/post/27054157

https://lemmy.world/post/27008261

To allowing altered headlines and permitting known propaganda outlets:

https://lemmy.world/post/28275465

https://lemmy.world/post/27428838

https://lemmy.world/post/27416097

https://lemmy.world/post/27314050

https://lemmy.world/post/27288953

That spew Russian talking points like Ukraines invasion just being a "negotiating tactic" https://lemmy.world/post/27012640

To general hostility to other instances who haven't "seen the way" yet https://lemmy.world/post/27426510

To their open declaration of support for Russia (direct from dessalines) https://lemmy.world/post/27352415

To even "concentration camps were just reeducation camps and weren't that bad" https://lemmy.world/post/26985447

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

The literal definition of Tankie is supporting USSR tanks being sent for regime change/suppression of eastern Europe post war. Russia happened to peacefully give liberation to all of these countries, and to all of USSR. That US/NATO has continued its demonic diminishment of Russia after this point, including nazi coups under fake liberal colour revolutions in Georgia and Ukraine, does not make anyone opposed to the stupidity and demonism of empire overreach, a tankie. You supporting demonic nazis for diminishment of others (and Ukrainian population including nazis) is the problem, and baseless accusation of calling humans tankies or Putin contractors, your path to ensuring the stupid support your evil.

[–] technohippie@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Peaceful liberation, you have to be kidding.

I'd love you to talk with my still alive 90 years old Polish grandma who happened to directly experience all the bullshit when Stalin and Hitler were best friends forever and later the 50 years of post war "liberation" of Poland by the Soviets. I can ask her questions on your behalf if you want. Direct experience no propaganda books.

It's crazy how their propaganda extended so much brain rot.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You should no shit do like a mini video interview with her going over all the BS Tankie USSR talking points

[–] technohippie@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's actually a good idea. Well I think tankies are beyond reparation, they'll confidently think that my grandma is being paid by the CIA or something similar.. But just for having recorded her experience of how it was living under the USSR dictatorship could be worth.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

they'll confidently think that my grandma is being paid by the CIA or something similar

Maybe but it'd be good to counter their arguments to others who are watching/reading when they bring up their "sources" I for one would link back to it constantly lol

But just for having recorded her experience of how it was living under the USSR dictatorship could be worth.

This was mainly my reasoning, beyond having something to shove in the tankies face, just having that recorded bit of history from someone who lived it would be invaluable to both the general public and for personal sentimental reasons for yourself

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

The literal definition of Tankie is supporting USSR tanks being sent for regime change/suppression of eastern Europe post war.

Dude, language is constantly changing, word definitions change and words can have multiple definitions. We all know what the historical definition is, but it does not have bearing on the current modern day definition. "Gay" used to mean happy, and it still technically is but it's now a secondary historical definition in the modern day. Same with Tankie.

That US/NATO has continued its demonic diminishment of Russia after this point, including nazi coups under fake liberal colour revolutions in Georgia and Ukraine, does not make anyone opposed to the stupidity and demonism of empire overreach. You supporting demonic nazis for diminishment of others (and Ukrainian population including nazis) is the problem

LMAO yes yes poor poor Russia I'm sure Putler is actually a really nice good guy just trying to fight against the evils of the world!!!!

baseless accusation of calling humans tankies

Oh but lobbing "shitlib/libtard" or "liberals" as "dehumanizing pejoratives" is ok?

[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I checked, guys. OP doesn't have .ml next to his name.

Sadly, this means we can't just call him out and we have to actually read the post this time.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

I read it, it's very much just going into more detail on what we've all been saying about tankies this whole time. In fact while reading it a few... infamous ... .ml tankie users popped in my head that fit the description I was reading perfectly LMAO

[–] _bac@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I have never seen any discussion like you are describing. However I see a post complaining of tankies every day.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You're on .world, you're isolated from the worst of the Tankie Triad (Hexbear and Lemmygrad), .ml admins in an effort to avoid larger calls for defederation like with hex and grad, try to do things far more subtlety through mod action or in action (e.g. removing comments and posts critical of their favored Authoritarian regimes but allowing known propaganda outlets from those Regimes to fester and spread)

Just a few days ago, for example, a users comment was removed and then banned for calling the USSR a Dictatorship and North Korea a monarchy using one of 2 "catch-all" instance rules they use to justify the removal of any speech they don't like (Rule 1 is "officially" no bigotry and Rule 2 is "officially" Be respectful)

and there's much much much more on !meanwhileongrad@sh.itjust.works documented

The posts "complaining" about the tankies are mostly from users like slrpunk or .ee that don't defederate from the Triad and thus are exposed to it far more often