this post was submitted on 06 May 2025
1018 points (96.3% liked)

Technology

69845 readers
3700 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nous@programming.dev 347 points 2 days ago (17 children)

Yen also pointed out how such a court decision could help cut inflation in the US, too, "by dropping the price of a significant chunk of digital purchases by 30% overnight".

I bet most companies will just take that extra 30% as profit rather than giving it back to their users like proton has.

[–] athairmor@lemmy.world 79 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (6 children)

Yeah, even of the companies don’t pocket the difference, he’s an idiot to suggest that this will cut inflation.

This guy is just not very smart, I think.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 106 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think he’s a salesperson trying to sell the idea that getting rid of the apple tax is good for consumers.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 2 days ago (9 children)

getting rid of the apple tax is good for consumers.

I mean that's not wrong. I had no idea Apple was double-dipping like this. I wonder if Google is doing the same thing...

[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 39 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Every store does this. Even Holy Valve

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (6 children)

Every company who takes a cut from in-app purchases, be it subscriptions or DLC, should be kneecapped by this ruling.

It's one thing for the hosting marketplace (App Store, Steam, Play Store, etc) to take a cut from the initial purchase of a game/app. But it's a whole other issue for that initial marketplace to keep reaching further into the dev's pockets and take a cut from in-app purchases unrelated to where it was originally obtained.

[–] Greercase@lemmus.org 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That just turns paid apps into splash screens for in-app purchases though. That way apple never gets a cut because the "purchase" is in-app. Pay to be listed (maybe tiered depending on downloads) seems fair especially because it doesn't incentivize people to do scammy things with pricing. It's already a fee anyway.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That just turns paid apps into splash screens for in-app purchases though

Welcome to Android lol

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] hikaru755@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

What? Since when does Valve prohibit companies from redirecting customers to non-Valve purchasing flows? Because that's what this ruling is about, it says Apple can't prohibit apps from telling users to go buy off-platform for lower prices. Valve isn't doing that with Steam afaik, actually I'm not aware of any other platform that does this

[–] JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Valve will even allow developers to create their own Steam keys free of charge and sell them wherever they want with no commission whatsoever

That’s pretty open I’d say

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] plz1@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago

Yeah, Proton is bucking the obvious trend, with this one. Most companies will totally take the profits rather than lowering prices.

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago

Companies that were app-first like mobile games probably won't cut prices much if any. Companies that were web-first like Proton and Patreon probably will.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] philycheeze@sh.itjust.works 128 points 2 days ago (22 children)

Do he still think fascism is good for small businesses though?

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] suicidaleggroll@lemm.ee 83 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

If they can charge 30% less without Apple's fees, then why are their prices the same whether you buy on their iOS app or direct on their website? Why have they been overcharging users who don't buy through the iOS app by 30% all this time?

[–] Scipitie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 103 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Old knowledge disclaimer, but if they didn't change it then:

Because Apple literally tells people that they're not allowed to charge less somewhere else - at least that was the case several years ago...

[–] patrick@lemmy.bestiver.se 26 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Some things do charge different amounts though. YouTube Premium for example is more expensive if you subscribe in iOS but maybe that’s just because it’s Google.

They also could have just not let anyone subscribe through the iOS app. Lots of things do that.

[–] errer@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I’ve noticed this too, there’s no consistency. Some companies seem to get away with two prices, others not.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is the same on most platforms. You'll rarely find a product for different prices in different places because if they're listed on Amazon, Steam, Apple, Google, etc. they're not allowed to.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

That isn't exactly true with Steam. Valve does allow a dev to offer a discount at a different store as long as that same discount comes to Steam in a reasonable amount of time.

Straight from the docs:"It's OK to run a discount for Steam Keys on different stores at different times as long as you plan to give a comparable offer to Steam customers within a reasonable amount of time."

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago

Because Apple prohibited that.

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Likely they were not allowed to by the terms they agreed to with apple.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] commander@lemmy.world 81 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Damn. People here sure love purity testing. The guy could pay for their cancer treatment and still slap him every chance because they got it wrong publicly in the past but once you get it wrong publicly once, you're out of the club. Go be a conservative we don't want you. When someone at Tuta has a bad year and ends up in the wrong publicly, find another email service to try and convince people to go too. Probably worse in functionality than Tuta as you go down to smaller and worse funded efforts in this niche field of Internet activism

But people here do it here too to Mozilla because they don't like their social outreach programs and their attempts to get advertising revenue so screw Mozilla too. So because nothing but perfection is acceptable, push away people that may be adjacent/left leaning right and switch to less developed products. Switch from Firefox and attack Mozilla who do the bulk of Firefox development and use Waterfox who do a custom deployment/build. Pure display of perfection being the enemy of good here.

You want people to embrace privacy but keep whiplashing people around when the org/anyone in leadership says something wrong. Screw Signal, they're not perfect. Screw Matrix/Element, some developer said something one day so it's all bad. I'm surprised anyone here uses any privacy software or a major open source software like Linux or Krita or Blender at the risk that someone in the background may be wrong in someway which I am 100% certain they exist in important positions. Same with Lemmy

Go back to the 60s and you all would be shitting on Fred Hampton for accepting the impure and the color coalition for everyone that had ever said something wrong. Al Franken definitely would not make it with y'all. Y'all can't build up leftist communities because y'all are bitter assholes that can't move on and spend so much time purity testing. Y'all are probably mediocre too so can't make a difference in privacy and data ownership activism anyways so should be lining up to support not just Tuta, someone hasn't screwed up publicly yet, and Proton

Reminds me of Aung San Suu Kyi. She was under the gun of the military ruling class that permitted limited democratic government and because she didn't make speech as if she lived in the US, a bunch of Americans turned on her and celebrated when the military dictatorship came back to rule and put her in prison the moment it seemed like the civilian government would actually assert more power

[–] anachrohack@lemmy.world 23 points 10 hours ago (12 children)

It's not a purity test so much as a fear that publicly signaling loyalty to trump devalued their trustworthiness as private and secure. If their CEO legitimately believes that Republicans are better on tech policy than democrats because conservatives want to weaponize the federal government to control speech online, then I don't really trust him not to cooperate with federal authorities when they want to access someone's emails or vpn traffic. Conservatives are simply not trustworthy to me

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] compostgoblin@slrpnk.net 66 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Cool! Still not gonna put all my eggs in the fascist-sympathetic basket

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ABetterTomorrow@lemm.ee 65 points 2 days ago (1 children)

“Up to”…… here’s 5% off

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 30 points 1 day ago

Very true. I'm giving you up to* 1000 upvotes.

[–] throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works 47 points 1 day ago (3 children)

So, Mr. Yen, are you still sympathetic to the republicans, who have a disdain for the same courts that gave you a win?

Or is your head burried so deep in your particle accelerator you don't even have any clue about politics?

Dude thinks he knows everything because he has a PhD in Physics, literally out of touch with the politics that anyone doing 5 minutes of web searching can understand.

[–] chamgireum@lemm.ee 13 points 1 day ago

no no, you see Trump is totally anti-big tech. once he bleeds them dry from all the bribes they'll be gone! /s

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Dude thinks he knows everything because he has a PhD in Physics, literally out of touch with the politics that anyone doing 5 minutes of web searching can understand.

This is such a common thing. STEM education needs to be more well rounded.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

No doubt Proton’s CEO will use this to justify his “Trump is better for regulating big tech” claim, while ignoring that the judge is an Obama appointee.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Inb4 Trump invents tariffs on foreign coded software

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This the trump-licker? Yeah, bye Proton.

Buh bye now

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 18 points 1 day ago

It's time to end monopolies

[–] fubarx@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's not exactly 30%. For sales below $1M, it's 15%: https://developer.apple.com/app-store/small-business-program/

In Europe, where this was established last year, they started charging a Core Technology Fee to cover the cost of hosting and data transfer: https://developer.apple.com/support/core-technology-fee/

And if you switch payment providers, you have to pay at least 2.5% plus transaction and any intermediary fees.

It's nice that Proton is offering a discount, but for everyone else there may be additional ongoing costs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dutchkimble@lemy.lol 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But I already use proton and purchased outside the Apple Store (on the proton website) and use it on my iPhone? What changed?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 13 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Should have done a valve and allowed selling anywhere but require price parity. Now from their greed there will be financial incentive for people to use another platform.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I got a Proton two-year subscription that averages out to two dollars and change per month.

I already feel like I got an incredible deal.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›