this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
180 points (98.4% liked)

Canada

8706 readers
1440 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


๐Ÿ Meta


๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ Provinces / Territories


๐Ÿ™๏ธ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


๐Ÿ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


๐Ÿ’ป Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


๐Ÿ’ต Finance, Shopping, Sales


๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Politics


๐Ÿ Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Canadian military leadership is close to their U.S. counterparts and is reluctant to shift its focus from America. Some retired Canadian Forces senior officers, such as former chief of the defence staff Gen. Rick Hillier, have voiced support for a Canada that is integrated more closely with the U.S. On Feb. 15, Hillier went on the social media website X to express his support for Canadian businessman Kevin O'Leary's proposal for a common dollar, integrated border and immigration requirements with the U.S.

But retired Vice Admiral Mark Norman has warned that Canada is under attack from the Americans.

Norman argued in a Feb. 14 National Post column that Canada should not sit back and let the U.S. destroy the country. "This may need to include otherwise previously unthinkable actions such as shutting off our oil and gas, electrical power and critical supplies, as well as the abandonment of historic diplomatic and military relationships and commitments," Norman pointed out.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.ca 35 points 17 hours ago

Some retired Canadian Forces senior officers, such as former chief of the defence staff Gen. Rick Hillier, have voiced support for a Canada that is integrated more closely with the U.S.

Boy am I glad he is retired then.

I hope we tell this delegation that we are thrilled to see them and discuss this with them.

[โ€“] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 20 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

They may also want to put some feelers out towards Australia. The previous conservative government dragged the country into a deal for US submarines that seemed to be more politically motivated than practical, and thatโ€™s looking more in doubt every day.

[โ€“] k0e3@lemmy.ca 11 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

They screwed over France for that right? Not sure if SK would take the risk with a buyer who thongs, I mean flip flops like that.

[โ€“] rxbudian@lemmy.ca 8 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

Canada can make the same deal with France.
I just hope the manual is in English...

[โ€“] Skunk@jlai.lu 5 points 8 hours ago

Don't worry, we'll sell the sub to Quรฉbec so they can sell them again to the rest of Canada.

[โ€“] nyan@lemmy.cafe 3 points 5 hours ago

Eh, if there's a usable French manual, we've got plenty of people who can translate it. (Korean not so much, maybe.)

[โ€“] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

A French speaking person in Canada? Chance in a million surely.

How about them south Korean subs?

[โ€“] magnetosphere@fedia.io 11 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

It would be best if Canada could just fend for itself. As weโ€™ve seen, even relationships that seem rock solid can change very quickly.

Buying from the U.S. would be the worst possible choice.

[โ€“] nyan@lemmy.cafe 3 points 5 hours ago

Thing is, we've got a large amount of very thinly populated Arctic land that we have to defend. Granted, modern equipment allows us to defend more land with less people, but it's expensive even without the requirement that it has to function in extreme cold. Maybe we could make it work, but we'd have to throw a lot of money at it, and the political will hasn't been there up to this point.

[โ€“] SamuelRJankis@sh.itjust.works 10 points 13 hours ago

Post Media article. Seems to be a rising amount of these here.

It is a topic exclusively reported from the article author and I don't see anything questionable within the contents although I'm not familiar with the topic.

[โ€“] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

So Hillier is mad, got it.

[โ€“] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

Yeah, an army general isn't who I would listen to on subs. Especially when Adm. Norman is there.