this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
60 points (96.9% liked)

Canada

8706 readers
1441 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Darkcoffee@sh.itjust.works 38 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

We should nationalize the internet network, and make it reach these communities ourselves. If Bell Rogers and Telus couldn't get it done in decades, that means the oligopoly is too advanced and they're getting complacent.

[–] Akuchimoya@startrek.website 17 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

ISPs will provide service so long as it is profitable. It is not profitable to go to northern, remote areas through all the trees and terrain for the relatively few people who would be customers, even at 100% market share. If there was profit to be made by expanding to remote places, they'd be there already.

Although this thread is about Internet, this is also why it's incredibly stupid for people to whine about Canada Post not being profitable. Of course its not profitable, its a national service that services literally every unprofitable community and person in the country. Even with the recent price increase, it definitely costs a lot more than $1.24 for Canada Post to deliver a letter from Windsor to Iqaluit.

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 9 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Honestly at this late stage of the game making sure everyone in Canada has reliable internet service should be a no-brainer. The gov't needs to build it, then rent the lines to service providers (forced, if they decline). Prices will be the same across the board, regulated by a CRTC that hasn't been bought out by the big three.

I'm hoping that Carney brings in legislation that equalizes access and cost.

[–] Akuchimoya@startrek.website 5 points 5 hours ago

I absolutely agree that Internet should be a nationalized service, with the option of private players. Saskatchewan has (for cellphones) Sasktel by the government, and all prices are lower even from the for profit companies. We should have crown corps + private enterprise for everything that is an essential service. Mail has Canada Post + private couriers.

The nationwide Rogers outage... When was that, a year ago? Put all kinds of businesses, banking, local payment systems, etc. on hold. How is it acceptable to the nation that essential infrastructure is entirely private?

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

If all it does is funnel US worldview, US culture, US ideology (which so much of the internet does) what’s the rush?? Canada needs to ban or tarrif US owned media, seeing as they have stated they want to annex/invade.

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works -2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

People are allowed to choose what they read on the internet because nobody made you king over their freedom of choice.

[–] terath@sh.itjust.works 27 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Canada is building its own starlink like service.

https://www.telesat.com/leo-satellites/

The first production satellites will start launching in 2026. It sucks that remote communities will have to wait a few more years, but it’s better than buying from a hostile foreign power that we’re at war with.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 8 points 11 hours ago

100%. And old school satellite internet service still exists, it just sucks by comparison. Xplorenet and the like.

Slipping my mind right now but I recently learned of an alternative company that has something similar that seems like it's already in operation. Can't remember if it's Canadian or not though.

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

A company headquartered in Canada and "Canada" are very different things.

I can't believe I live in an era where we celebrate blocking ourselves off from space for the sake of private interests selling higher resolution porn to rural communities. Especially when we could just be investing in public, terrestrial infrastructure.

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

If you are going to pitch “public, terrestrial infrastructure”, you better link to some explanation of how it would be remotely economic or feasible.

Holding out for terrestrial infrastructure means no connectivity in practice much of the time. Classic case of letting the dream of a perfect plan become the enemy of a good one.

[edit: not pro StarLink by the way]

[–] Subscript5676@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 hours ago

“Investing in public infrastructure” is not a term I’ve heard from any government in a long time and it saddens me.

[–] peteyestee@feddit.org 12 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

You'd have to be incredibly stupid to want starlink.

Even if it's the only option, it shouldn't be considered an option.

[–] npcknapsack@lemmy.ca 10 points 15 hours ago

We need to make a solution for remote communities. Carney wants to build, well, a real internet project for our northern communities would be one form of building.