I still occasionally slip on that myself. It's the first non-Microsoft office suite I used and it's burned into my memory.
Fediverse
A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).
If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!
Rules
- Posts must be on topic.
- Be respectful of others.
- Cite the sources used for graphs and other statistics.
- Follow the general Lemmy.world rules.
Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)
Same here .... I started off for about four or five years on OpenOffice until it devolved into some weird open/private organization and everyone revolted and it turned into LibreOffice. I held onto OpenOffice for a while and then realized the LibreOffice was more open source system .... but you're right, whenever I look up anything as an Microsoft alternative, OpenOffice is the first to come to mind.
Sorry I forget sometimes. It’s just that OpenOffice is a way better name. “Libre” is a pretty uncommon word in English and LibreOffice sounds like astrology software.
yeah i agree the name is terrible.
Unfortunately, corporations have bastardized the term “open” (looking at you, OpenAI) trying to get the credit Open Source software has earned.
Libre was a good choice to emphasize “free as in speech”.
IIRC the LibreOffice fork happened years before the public had any awareness of OpenAI (and when OpenAI was, in fact, publishing open models).
I don't even know if I pronounce it right. Is it like libré or is it more like a lobster-tiger hybrid? Or a Lemur-cobra.hybtid?
Also, if they're watching, the themes still make the UI all funky unless it's on the default—at least for Calc, anyway.
I say leeb-ruh, like it’s a Spanish loanword.
Lee-bruh is definitely the way to go since it fluidly connects to the first syllable of "office". If you do "lib-ray" or "lee-bray", you're forcing a ton of unnecessary annunciation on yourself.
Agreed, but sounds too much like “Libra Office” ♎️⚖️
bruh
At risk of going of topic, is this a Millennial meme?
Like, I really hope younger folks have seen this.
Ah, not it's again!
Think "Zebra" (NA English) but with an 'L'.
LibreOffice may not be the prettiest or the most stable, but dammit, it gets the job done
OnlyOffice is good too if you want a more modern interface.
is that like onlyfans but like linkedin?
Sure. Whatever helps you sleep at night.
I wonder why Apache continues to support OpenOffice. Its barely moved since 2014 and hasn't even had a security update since 2023. They could archive it as an active project (keep the code available for those who want it) and redirect most users who land on the OpenOffice site to LibreOffice.
I didn't even realize you could install OpenOffice anymore... it's doesn't seem available in the Arch repos. https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Apache_OpenOffice
Oh, wow. TIL https://www.openoffice.org/
I'm trying to tell everyone LibreOffice, but OpenOffice has all the hits on search when people look for an alternative to Microsoft Office
I feel targeted. I commented somewhere last week saying someone should use OpenOffice when I meant LibreOffice.
It's just old reflexes.
Setup an autocorrect phrase :D
Whats funny is the people mentioning open office then saying libre office is not up to snuff and when they don't seem to realize the difference you know they have not used it in awhile. I mean like over a decade likely if your mentioning open office.
If only LibreOffice’s user interface weren’t so outdated, I would definitely use it instead of OnlyOffice.
Outdated on Windows? Because on Linux, the LibreOffice UI is great, imo.
I think it's plenty functional, but it looks dated and less flashy. I don't mind that myself, but it does put some people off
Only office is basically the same interface again, all cloning MS-office 2007-2010.
Bleach.
Odd, I didn't think I was there in the first place.
Edit: it's a joke 🤷♂️
Is this really the intended behaviour for linking a Mastadon post?
Oh yeah, i found that on my mastodon account so i copied that link instead of the real instance. But i updated the post now to use correct link