this post was submitted on 05 May 2025
789 points (98.9% liked)

Cyberstuck

852 readers
381 users here now

A place to post your Cybertruck fails! We're here to make fun of this hunk of shit and throw as much shade as we can to that garbage bag of a human elon.

No doxxing No slurs No racism And no fucking nazis!

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
 
all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 162 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The YouTuber EngineeringExplained also explained how although the cybertruck complies with the requirements for its advertised tow rating, this tow rating system is vastly inadequate for the real world and all other manufacturers overbuild the crap out of their trucks because they know that.

This is why cybertrucks are known to literally rip their frames apart while towing what they are technically rated for.

[–] Rubisco@slrpnk.net 48 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)
[–] DogWater@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

Engineering explained is an excellent YouTube channel.

He also debunked the claim that the cybertruck won a drag race vs a 911 while towing a 911

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago
[–] LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago

Wait, so every car manufacturer has already identified the problem decades ago, decided that bad press is worse than a few more dollars, and fixed it? Except the disruptive genius who knows everything? Nice.

[–] OpticalMoose@discuss.tchncs.de 117 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 week ago

Shuttle Endeavour is housed at the California Science Center in Los Angeles, and fun fact, the Tundra that towed it is also still on display there.

collapsed inline media

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 76 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Looks more like a rocket engine

[–] walden@sub.wetshaving.social 39 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yep, an unfortunate typo. A jet engine of that size would be more impressive because they weigh more.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's not a typo, that's a good old mistake. If they wrote "roket engine" it would be a typo.

[–] walden@sub.wetshaving.social 2 points 1 week ago

Ha that's funny, I could have sworn I wrote "mistake", because I had the same thought. Oops

[–] markovs_gun@lemmy.world 42 points 1 week ago (2 children)

FYI according to CPI inflation $2,500 in 1972 is worth about $19,000 today. Based on a comparison of median individual income that would be similar to about $25,000. Either way, the truck cost about the same as a Honda Civic does today.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I paid less for my first house in 1994 than a cybertruck costs today, in current dollars.

Vehicles are insanely expensive in real dollars today.

[–] markovs_gun@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's more that they're way bigger and more complicated now. A simple vehicle is still pretty much the same as I showed in my comment,

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 week ago

the car market, especially in america, is completely fucked beyond saving. EVERYTHING is gargantuan and lethal.

in a sane world most people should only be driving small electric moped cars.

[–] PanArab@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don’t think you can even get a Chevrolet Colorado for that price. If only Chinese pickups were available in the US.

[–] markovs_gun@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The issue is more a market issue than anything. People prefer to buy giant trucks instead of reasonable ones.

[–] PanArab@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

In the US you are mostly true. The Maverick and Santa Cruz shows there’s a market for sensible pickup trucks but it is relatively small.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 31 points 1 week ago

Continued astonishment at how consistently and repeatedly they self-own with stunts like this. Humiliation fetish is the only explanation.

[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 30 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)
[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The Mini Cooper EV pulled a plane not long ago, it's all for show.

collapsed inline media

[–] GluWu@lemm.ee 43 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Single humans pull planes all the time as strong man stunts

collapsed inline media

[–] veroxii@aussie.zone 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Planes are super light or how else would they float off into the air to fly? /s

[–] Tja@programming.dev 4 points 1 week ago

That have hollow bones!

[–] LeFrog@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think you missed the !:

![](https://www.digitaltrends.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/TundraTowsEndeavour004.jpg)

collapsed inline media

[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago
[–] Tikiporch@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

Considering what usually tows these things around, it's kind of a weak flex.

[–] invertedspear@lemm.ee 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In either case, how impressive is this really? If you balance the load properly to keep the tongue weight within spec, all you’re then doing is overcoming inertia and the friction of the wheels. What is the force to overcome those in either picture?

[–] takenaps@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The magnitude of the friction on the tires is still dependent on the load so would be hard to say without crunching the numbers.. but ya I agree with u, its probably much less impressive than it appears, which is all that really matters w demos like this

[–] baldingpudenda@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

There was also a demo of a cyberpunk pulling a train. I think it was practical engineering on YouTube. He then goes on to explain how little it actually takes to break fiction, why there's slack so you only pull one cart in the beginning and get inertia to do a lot of the work. It basically called out the stupid demo, and went on to show why trains are awesome.

[–] lettruthout@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

We’re sure that the engine isn’t pushing the Cybertruck?

[–] Hupf@feddit.org 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Of course a plane would be super light, how else could it fly?

[–] JoeDyrt@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago

Empty Weight of a Boeing 747 is 325,660–336,870 lb. (wiki)

It carries 4 turbo-fan engines, each of which weighs approximately 12,000 lbs. (also wiki)

So the 747 weighs at least 27 times heavier than one engine, on average. ( iOS calc)

[–] noughtnaut@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

A giant thank you for reminding me of the now-ancient first-ever viral video - 405

collapsed inline media

[–] Doctor_Satan@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago

The effects still hold up. Better than a lot of big budget movies of that era, even.

[–] Pnut@lemm.ee 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It was a bit before my time but my cousin pointed this out to me a few years ago. Truck ads were absolutely nuts back in the 80s. They 100% destroyed every one that was in the commercials.

[–] vivendi@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago

INDEPENDENT

FRONT

SUSPENSION

[–] 2910000@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

I just watched the 1972 ad.
It's weird they used a mechanical grating sound in their background music

[–] The_Che_Banana@beehaw.org 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

19, 126 in today's Trumpbux

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

Every day we stray further from the light.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

looks like the warhead of icbm, hes delivering to putins planes.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago
  1. That's an engine, the other end of an ICBM
  2. Doesn't Russia already have their own warheads? You know, since they're such a global constant threat?
  3. Is there anything going on in the world that doesn't involve Russia according to you?
  4. Did you check under your bed? Behind your couch? In your closet? You know, for mind-control devices, etc?