this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2025
483 points (99.0% liked)

memes

12695 readers
2932 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 76 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The 2024 animated movie Flow was done entirely in Blender. It is an incredible movie, highly recommend.

[–] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 28 points 7 hours ago

Blender was also used a bit in Everything Everywhere All At Once

[–] OR3X@lemm.ee 42 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Running FOSS on closed source systems. Classic.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 46 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

It'a a start! Makes the switch much easier.

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Agreed, OSS purity is silly. I am running an open source client (Thunder) to this open source service on my Pixel 9 running GraphineOS, the low level firmware is still absolutely proprietary.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Actually, to be clear, I don't think FOSS purity is bad. I just mean that denigrating what others are doing because they're using something non-free while they're making steps in the right direction is dumb and counterproductive.

To my mind, FOSS is the only way forward for a healthy, functioning society, and the fact that so much of our digital landscape is being gradually replaced with it is to me evidence of that. I think the end goal should always be pure FOSS, but that doesn't (necessarily) mean immediately jumping to all FOSS; it just means taking steps to cut out proprietary software wherever you reasonably can.

[–] herrvogel@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

No. You either go full Stallman and inject Gentoo directly into your aorta, or you might as well be deep throating Satya Nutella while bouncing on Tim Apple's lap. Filthy casual.

Noob, I snort pure Colombian and run LFS directly in my brain using the power of cryptic dreams and messages handed down to me directly by Lord RMS

[–] tfowinder@lemmy.ml 16 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

Oh it's free so it lacks features

[–] Matriks404@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

If you don't count professional software, nowadays it's actually the opposite. Very often in proprietary software there are features removed with no alternative provided by developers, or there's one but actually it has nothing to do with what you actually want.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 3 points 2 hours ago

Sometimes they actually have too many

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 2 points 1 hour ago

Exactly! And every proprietary software is by definition perfect cause it is subject to the forces of the open market. Subway eat fresh and freeze, scumbag!

[–] melfie@lemmings.world 1 points 55 minutes ago* (last edited 44 minutes ago)

It’s a jack of all trades for sure, but it also has features paid software doesn’t, like it’s 2d animation system with Grease Pencil. There are also paid extensions on BlenderMarket and the like that make it more competitive with more specialized features in other software. Extensions are GPL licensed, so I’m happy to pay for them as opposed to the rest of the toxic CG ecosystem where everything is subscription-only.

Edit:

I wish all paid software were GPL. It’s nice buying something and being able to look at and change the code, write code that calls their code, or even snag a bit of it for to use in your own thing.

[–] Shipairtime@lemmy.world 12 points 7 hours ago

I just got blender after having last looked at it ten years ago. It looks so much better! I had an easy time finding stuff. If you tried it in the past and are afraid of how ugly it was it is worth another shot. Also look up the doughnut tutorial.

[–] thevoidzero@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I'd like to make it like that for my projects, but I don't use windows so I can't do well with packaging them. And sometimes when I try it runs in the computer, but then doesn't run in other computers because of missing dlls or some other things.

Anyone have good idea how to make it easy. Using windows VM is such a hassle to install and such just for tiny programs I make.

[–] hangonasecond@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Make them in a portable language. Something like Java for example. Or you can write in rust and compile for each target.

[–] thevoidzero@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

It's in rust. Problem is the gtk part, it has to be installed in the system, which makes it run there. But how do I distribute the program without having everyone install gtk on their computer. In Linux it's just a dependency so it's not a problem, for windows I can't seem to make it work.

Edit: also, I need gtk because people around me who uses windows aren't going to use CLI program at all.

[–] Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Oof GTK is probably one of the worst dependencies you can try and port to Windows.

What I've done in the past is use something like Onno Setup which can call a script during install.

Or, and this is new to me, use the Official tools to build a package for windows on whatever Linux distro you are on. From what I'm reading, it should package GTK with it.

[–] SleepyPie@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago

Me running Godot on a new computer yesterday

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

On a somewhat related note, why do so many open source projects give me a zip file with a single exe inside it instead of just the exe directly?

[–] tja@sh.itjust.works 10 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Because zipping it can reduce the size

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 9 points 5 hours ago

Plus a lot of antivirus whatevers will straight up block the downloading of *.exe

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

EXE files don't really compress well, plus the files should already be internally compressed when the exe is built.

[–] joyjoy@lemm.ee 1 points 4 hours ago

A lot of exe files are secretly zip files. zip files can contain arbitrary data at the end of the file. exe files can have arbitrary data at the start of the file. It's a match made at Microsoft.

load more comments
view more: next ›