RFK overrules all the actually qualified scientists who know how to do this stuff, to propose that some Americans be given a placebo to see whether the unvaccinated get sicker than those with a vaccine, even though there will be plenty of unvaccinated people to look at anyway.
News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
I'd say it's incredibly stupid, but with everything we know about RFK, the Occam's razor explanation is that the point has always been to limit vaccine availability.
This just supports that he's not even going to do it above-board, he's going to use bad faith pretexts to do it.
“We can’t release this vaccine for 30 years until we know that the placebos all got the disease and the vaccinated held resistance that whole time without producing any babies with autism”
Who could possibly know more about health than some person who never went to med school
A nepo baby, of course. They're famously really good at everything. That's why they're always getting hired to high up positions, right?
An increasing number of Americans, even Gen Z, according to studies I've read.
It's terrifying.
No formal education in medicine, sure, but he's got a ton of experience using needles.
Reminder that the person in charge of health in the US:
-picked up a roadkilled bear, drove around with it, then dumped it in Central Park to make it look like a biker killed it
-decapitated a beached whale with a chainsaw, strapped it to his roof, then drove home while his children got rained on by whale juice
-forced friends to watch as he liquified mice and chicks in a blender to feed his raptors
Already done on clinical trials. Read the reports, laws and guidelines for clinical trials.
I doubt he even can read any more, the worm got to that part
That's a fantastic idea! We could take it a step further and study what happens to unvaccinated people, too!
While I agree, a placebo trial does have validity vs just observing people who didn't take the drug.
Placebo is something to think about but has no place in a vaccine trial for an active contagion. People are injected and not told if its the vaccine or just saline. The placebo effect is minimal in anything non subjective. So with a painkiller yeah ok, but with a vaccine. Nope.
That's absolutely not true. Placebo effect literally cures certain diseases
Maybe if the disease is completely subjective, but give me an example of a disease that does actual cell damage.
https://www.health.harvard.edu/mind-and-mood/putting-the-placebo-effect-to-work
It caused people actual relief of IBS and Parkinson's
Parkinson's disease is associated with a shortage of a brain chemical called dopamine, and in studies of the disease, placebos have increased the production of dopamine.
It did not cure the disease thats pain relief.
Increasing the dopamine level in the brain is not pain relief, that's a physical change
It can actually cure high blood pressure (which can cause stroke and heart disease)
Increasing dopamine is totally pain relief. Its one way the body does it. Both blood pressure and dopamine levels can be effected by visualization and meditation. It is nothing like actually effecting a disease progression. I mean it could cause people to not feel as bad while having the disease but nothing in terms of fighting the actual disease.
Blood pressure is actually affecting your chances of dying from heart disease or stroke, so yes, it's changing the disease progression
So the key thing here with placebo is its a mental effect. It effects things you could otherwise effect with your mind. You can't kill viruses in this manner. Adding to this if you testing for a communicable disease the placebo group that is given something 100% inneffective in fighting the virus/microbe is problematic as it may lead to "risky" behavior. This is why generally you have the population you test on and you use the general population as the control group to compare against. I will give you that placebo in that circumstance might cause people to list symptoms as less severe but its just not worth it.
You can't kill viruses, but you can see if the side effects are nocebo or real. If the placebo group complains about the side effects are the same rate it means they are not statistically significant
This is just not worth it when you have to be worried about infection in a populace. Again the placebo group may and likely will have more risk taking behavior. This was really the crux of my initial reply. Its not that there is 100% nothing you can get from it but the risk trade off is not worth it.
Placebo?! 🤣
Apparently infections are all in your head.
In RFK's case, this is largely true.
WORMS are in his head.
"Sir, everyone who got the placebo shot died immediately!"
"Hmmmmmmm. Better run it again."
“But this time, the boss wants us to focus on sanctuary cities”
Placebos in red states sounds the most ethical choice here.
I mean, most of trumps cronies are unvaxxed anyway, just use them for the trial.
Make no mistake. They are all fully vaxxed. They just pander to low-information votes.
That’s fine, if he declares before the trials what results he would actually find convincing.
Will he be a test subject?
How ‘bout “no,” Bob?
What a terrible headline. Most people aren't gonna understand why that's unethical and harmful