this post was submitted on 02 May 2025
377 points (82.6% liked)

Technology

69726 readers
3462 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 380 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (11 children)

Before anyone gets too excited, the headline is clickbait. The bigger Chinese phone brands are looking into de-googled Android. They are still going to use Android.

several prominent Chinese smartphone manufacturers, including Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, and OnePlus, are exploring the possibility of developing versions of the Android operating system that do not rely on Google Mobile Services.

Chinese laptop makers are also in search of an OS that isn't Windows. Queue a race to prop Linux with Android support on that side of things.

[–] LMurch@thelemmy.club 138 points 3 days ago (9 children)

de-Googled android sounds even better. The story is cooler than the title!

[–] eco_game@discuss.tchncs.de 101 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I like your spirit, but I don't think a Chinese equivalent to Google Play Services would be more desirable

[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

All I want is unified push really. Then you just choose your server or host your own.

Or just Linux. Like furios or phosh, etc.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 36 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I mean they just replace Google with their own Chinese data-mining services so, no, not cool.

[–] nasi_goreng@lemmy.zip 12 points 3 days ago

Exactly what happened with Indonesian release of Huawei.

Also, more ads everywhere. Even your lock screen.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 10 points 2 days ago

No no no, it's not Chinese data mining.

it's just socialised data with Chinese characteristics! Much better.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 32 points 3 days ago

de-Googled android sounds even better.

They are already degoogled for the Chinese market. What the Chinese Android variants to not have is a shared replacement for Play Services and a shared app store because everyone is doing their own thing for maps API, payment, ...

[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 3 days ago

When the people are being beaten with a stick, they are not much happier if it is called “the People’s Stick.”

—Mikhail Bakunin

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] agitated_judge@sh.itjust.works 32 points 3 days ago

It also says:

It is currently unknown whether these companies would aim for compatibility with existing Android apps or follow the path of Huawei's latest HarmonyOS NEXT, which removes Android app support entirely

So, it's not clear yet.

[–] radiohead37@lemmynsfw.com 22 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The US/China decoupling is happening everywhere.

[–] libra00@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The front line is everywhere, there be no shelter here.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] haych@feddit.uk 137 points 2 days ago (7 children)

So that title is just a straight up lie. They want to use a de-googled Android.

To be honest I was hoping for an alternative OS, competition is always good. But a de-googled Android could possibly be good, but being Chinese I assume instead of Google telemetry you'll just be replacing it with CCP telemetry.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 21 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Honestly, I think a person in either nation should consider using the opposing nation's stuff. Harder for the US to backdoor Chinese encryption, or for Chinese to backdoor into an American phone. Play the bastards off each other.

Odds are, that the Trump Regime will use American apps and phones to identify and track targets for ICE traffickers. China probably does the same to Uighurs. The less attack surfaces they have, the better for their respective peoples.

[–] dogs0n@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 days ago

That sounds funny, but In that reality, the government with all its power will find a way in (they probably already have programs (as in departments) for finding their way into other countries tech).

Better to just install a proper de-googled android build (grapheneos, etc) and only use wifi (if data/phone num not needed) for the best odds.

In a couple of years (with more r&d, development and investment) I bet this will change to being use a linux phone.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] itisileclerk@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (3 children)

US telemetry == CCP telemetry, I can't see how CCP will be more damaging to regular person.

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 13 points 2 days ago

I think it’s just that they were saying his won’t end up benefitting us. It’s just changing who is holding the binoculars.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 10 points 2 days ago

Indded but as an Australian, if I have to have an anal probe i'd rather it from the CCP as they wont share it with my Government.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Lembot_0002@lemm.ee 136 points 3 days ago (21 children)

We need phones with standard Linux. Without strange "Java only mediator" or something. Just a normal OS.

Android is a pain in the ass.

[–] redlemace@lemmy.world 48 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

Exact! And please no bloatware!!

Oh wait, before anything else : NO, and I really mean NO AI and/or VR shit. Just none. None A T A L L

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So you exclusively want ai. Got it.

-Microsoft, probably

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] tal@lemmy.today 29 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I don't believe that they're likely to do GNU/Linux. I bet that they're going to do a fork of Android off AOSP or something like that.

Android's had a huge amount of work put into it to make it suitable to be a consumer mobile phone OS, and the companies here aren't doing this because they want stuff that GNU/Linux does, but rather because they're Chinese companies worried about a US-China industrial decoupling and its risks for them. Like, they were okay with the technical status; what changed was that they started to worry about having the rug pulled out from them.

That being said, I can at least imagine that helping GNU/Linux phone adoption. So, think about what happened with video games. There were some major platforms out there -- MacOS, iOS, Windows, various consoles, Android, GNU/Linux. That fragmented the market. Trying to port software to all platforms became a huge pain. What a lot of game developers did was to target a more-or-less platform-agnostic engine and let the engine handle the platform abstraction.

If the mobile OS space fragments further -- like, Android splits into "Google Android" and "China Android"


my guess is that that'll help drive demand for platform-agnostic engines to help improve portability, and porting one engine to GNU/Linux is a lot easier than every individual program.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 19 points 3 days ago (8 children)

Is this the year of the Ubuntu Touch Smartphone?

Probably not, but it should be.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 3 days ago (4 children)

I would love to have a phone that I could just plug into a USB C dock and use as a normal computer. They've got plenty of processing power for that now. Every single program I use except for games could run on a phone if it used normal GNU/Linux.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] MTK@lemmy.world 75 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Title is misleading, they are moving away from google services.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Yeah I was going to say there is very little alternative from iOS and Android or its derivatives. There used to be Windows Phones very breifly, but they're gone now.

Anthing else has to emulate the other OS to run mobile apps.

[–] nightlily@leminal.space 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nokia also had Meego but an ex-Microsoft exec sabotaged that.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ABetterTomorrow@lemm.ee 38 points 2 days ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 29 points 2 days ago

We are going to move away from Google, by basing our new future on AOSP, which is also primary maintained by Google.......I smell another FireOS level product on the horizon. Still Android, but worse.

[–] libra00@lemmy.world 27 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (17 children)

You probably should've led with the fact that this is Chinese phones, not like Samsung and shit.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 27 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

USA is being horrible at the moment, but China has a LOT of convincing to do before I'll let them deliberately have my data.

Best way remains to raise as high a digital moat against everyone. If you need a smartphone, get a Pixel, install Graphene on it and as few apps as possible.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] gencha@lemm.ee 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

A rumor of plans??! Tell me everything!!!

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Gurl let me spill the tea, there's word floating round in China that some bde powa playas be considering maybe kinda putting something together.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It makes sense for Chinese smartphone OEMs to move away from the Google version of Android. In the medium to long term you are setting up yourself for failure if you are reliant on an American company.

Unfortunately, the United States cannot be trusted.

[–] radiohead37@lemmynsfw.com 16 points 3 days ago (5 children)

It’s not like China can be trusted either. This is a matter of not relying on your adversary.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] kepix@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago

arent there mods on the sub to delete clickbait crap like this?

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If it's not proper linux I don't care

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] als@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 2 days ago

PostmarketOS for everyone!

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 14 points 3 days ago

Google meet Zune!

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 8 points 3 days ago (13 children)

How easy is it to degoogle Android? Don't currently use Android or iOS but dumb phone options are getting pretty limited these days.

If I got an Android phone I would probably be looking at something second hand because fuck paying 3 figures on a phone. I know I wouldn't use data at all, call/SMS SIM only. I guess another option is not needing to degoogle it as it will never talk to google once I have finished downloading maps of the country for OSMand and a few other apps. Then it can be on Wi-Fi to allow communication with my PC over LAN but don't allow it access to the internet.

If it never touches the internet after setup I guess outdated OS doesn't matter too much.

[–] dogs0n@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

If you're looking at getting a new (used) phone, I would suggest GrapheneOS (the most secure/private de-googled rom afaik).

You need a Pixel phone, the newer you get the longer you will keep getting software updates for the future (if you keep the phone past these many years of support, then I believe switching to a other rom will be required for security patches etc. Each phone is supported until Google stops supporting them I believe). You said you don't care about updates because you can keep it from connecting to the internet, but it's a plus anyways.

If you plan on never touching a google service, GrapheneOS allows for that (nothing google by default), but on the other hand, if you need google play, etc for banking apps or whatnot, they have that covered with Sandboxed Google Services (which you can run solely in another user profile on your phone for added privacy).

Anyways, I think GrapheneOS in a great option & their website has much more info if you'd like to continue hearing about it:

https://grapheneos.org/

p.s. you can check their website for how long different pixels will have continued support before (if) you get one (incase anyone else is reading this).

[–] oo1@lemmings.world 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

You have to be careful to get a phone and model supported by one of the projects. Check all compatibility and install instructions before buying a phone. And if you need a manufacturer supplied unlock code, make sure the manufacturer still gives them out . Some will discontinue that service after a few years.

For graphene os you need one of the gogle devices - i've never tried it but i think its the one most people like.

lineageos supports more devices usually older.

I recently got lineageos working on sony experia xa2 - very happy with it. But to get there i had to go try like 6 computers before one of them sucessfully sent the bootloader unlock code over the ADB. For some reason usb is temperamental when doing stuff like that

It is a lot easier on really old stuff like samsung galaxy s3 or s4 if you can tolerate something that old. Maybe you'll lso end upon an old version of lineage.

Once you get the bootloader unlocked it is generally straightforward. but modern phones make that fist part awkward.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›