this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2025
65 points (95.8% liked)

Not The Onion

16004 readers
1354 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'll believe it when I see it, and gleefully watch it fuck up all over the place to where it's thrown in a dumpster by a GC that doesn't have time for its shit.

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 23 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

I've worked in enough warehouses to know that a lot of owners would rather burn the building to the ground than pay to repair a piece of machinery, and I suspect these things will be more trouble than they're worth.

[–] Mpatch@lemmy.world 8 points 20 hours ago

I do equipment repairs for my bread and butter. And if they wanted to yes they most definitely will make equipment that is reliable as fuck and can be used and abused indefinitely. The worst part of it. All it takes is one ceo from deere, cat, komatsu, libberhr etc to say you know what, that construction guy pissed me off. It may sound petty but I have seen a local ceo buy out kenworth just because the sales guy was late and then fired him.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Easily. Don't get me wrong, I'm sure they could be useful in certain cases, especially once the technology matures. But it will be many years before then, and it'll be an uphill battle for them as construction workers don't take kindly to their jobs being threatened.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I'm sure there are already people taking a close look at these machines to determine the optimal place to insert a wooden shoe.

[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Tampering with any of their sensors should be enough

[–] luthis@lemmy.nz 2 points 7 hours ago

My money is on doing nothing at all is enough for them to royally screw up.

[–] luthis@lemmy.nz 7 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

They've figured out how to convert AI outputs into electricity??

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 9 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

It goes the other way: huge amounts of electricity -> moderate volume of useless AI outputs.

[–] luthis@lemmy.nz 4 points 22 hours ago

Ah I see. Well it's like the old saying goes, "I'd rather pay a ton of money to get AI robots to fuck everything up really badly and then go back to paying workers a barely livable wage, than pay workers a livable wage in the first place and not waste a ton of money."

[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Errr, don't we already have AI-powered welding machines in car factories?

collapsed inline mediaAI-powered welding machines in car factories

[–] luthis@lemmy.nz 2 points 7 hours ago

That was my first thought, but these are algorithmically/procedurally driven, not AI driven. Which makes them highly reliable, configurable, and consistent. Unlike AI machines which will hallucinate cup holders everywhere that are too large or too small to hold any actual cup.

[–] Aggravationstation@feddit.uk 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)
[–] sundray@lemmus.org 1 points 21 hours ago

Save the cat!