this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2025
374 points (99.5% liked)

politics

23163 readers
3212 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] End0fLine@midwest.social 89 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Hahahahaha. That’s hilarious and a good idea. Since it seems you have to pay to be put on this site, you know they’re genuine entries.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 31 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (5 children)

Sounds more like a scam to bilk their base out of even more money, which is on-point.

Reminds me of an old scam where you got a letter saying you were one of the smartest people in the country, and they wanted to include you in their book of smartest people. Except you had to pay and buy a copy of the book to be included.

(Something like that, anyway. If anyone recalls the details more clearly, please share).

[–] kooks_only@lemmy.ca 18 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

So many times I’ve thought fuck it, why don’t I get in on the grifting? Damn conscience getting in the way of potential riches.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 14 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

I know, right? I'd be really good at it, too, except for not being able to actually allow myself to do it.

Edit: How's this?

We mail letters to every registered R in the country. The letter tells them they're one of the top Patriots in the US. We would love to include their name in the big Book of Patriots so everyone will know how much of a patriot they are. There is a processing fee of $60. But, we will waive that fee if they buy a copy of the book for $75. And why wouldn't they want to buy a copy of a book they're in? They're also excellent gifts.

[–] talentedkiwi@sh.itjust.works 9 points 16 hours ago

$150 to include a photo!

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

That's not even fraud. There's nothing unethical about it.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, it is if I have no intention of mailing them a book lol.

Best they'll get is a Word doc posted to Sharepoint or something.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 8 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

In the old scam, I believe you world indeed get a book with the names of everyone who paid to get a book with the names of everyone who paid to get the book.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 3 points 15 hours ago
[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 2 points 10 hours ago

It's the "who's who" grift.

[–] b_tr3e@feddit.org 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

The whole vanity publishing industry works like that. Yes, there is such an industry. There's a highly accurate, slightly satiric and utterly confusing book about it, named "Il pendolo de Foucault" by Umberto Eco. (Probably something like "Foucault's Pendulum" in English). If it weren't that excessively long and the plot less complex I'd highly recommend it.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 5 points 15 hours ago

I have actually read that entire book. I second that recommendation.

[–] grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 13 hours ago

I used to get letters from Who's Who among American High School Students. Wikipedia has a write-up about that category of questionable practice.

I've used similarly-titled books from the late 1800s/early 1900s for research, but nowadays we have the Internet.

[–] boydster@sh.itjust.works 3 points 12 hours ago

This happened with my sister and I think it was for poetry. At least, the version of it my parents fell for was for poetry writing. They might have run this scam for any number of things for all I know

[–] meyotch@slrpnk.net 1 points 6 minutes ago

Who’ who

This was the one we would get in the mail once every couple of years. They come and go under different ownership, but it will never die for human vanity is a renewable resource.

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 19 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

From their About page, it's always fascinating to read how much dogwhistle coded language they put in there to make sure you know this site isn't run by or for those people:

For far too long, American consumers and business owners who cherish family values

No gays here!

and God-given liberty

This is a Christian country, and if you don't like it, you can geeeeee-it outt.

have been overlooked by mainstream businesses.

More like "Lamestream," amirite, guys?? ...Guys?

Despite their numbers and purchase power,

We conservatives are the majority, not those coincidentally, definitionally minorities!

they have lacked an economic ecosystem that truly aligns with their priorities.

The globalist economy isn't hateful enough to the things we hate, this makes us sad because we really want to feel aligned.

It’s time to embrace this community of customers and merchants by providing platforms, products, and services that enrich the way of life they hold dear.

We needed to very carefully adapt "way of life" from David Duke so people know we mostly almost completely don't 100% mean the white christian way of life. Well, let's just make sure we add extra photos of only white babies on the site so people get the message. Nailed it.

[–] xyzzy@lemm.ee 17 points 12 hours ago

I skimmed a bunch of businesses. From what I saw, most can be broken down into

  • Construction
  • Automotive
  • Beauty
  • Insurance
[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 17 points 12 hours ago

Oh man this is gold. Not just for boycott, but just to help minimize dealing with idiots on a financial level.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 12 points 14 hours ago

Thought there were just no businesses near me.... then I hit the automotive category lol.

[–] credo@lemmy.world 9 points 17 hours ago

Make sure you leave a yelp (or whatever) review.

[–] Freshparsnip@lemm.ee 8 points 11 hours ago

Reminds me of using the One Million Moms website, that tries to warn people away from LGBT media, as a list of suggestions for LGBT friendly media

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Just checked for local restaurants, and sure enough there's a few in my area. I haven't eaten at any of them, but now I know not to.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

You should let them know why.

[–] pleasegoaway@lemm.ee 4 points 13 hours ago

Nah. Just let them suffer and wonder.

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago

Spread the word and do your best to shut down the MAGAts.

[–] BlueEther@no.lastname.nz 2 points 16 hours ago

I really think that some of those products would be very easy to avoid

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 1 points 1 minute ago

Has anyone scraped a list from that shit site?