this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2025
506 points (91.5% liked)

politics

23183 readers
2935 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sibshops@lemm.ee 10 points 2 days ago

Well, I'm just going to go extra woke, now. Go woke or go broke.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The problem with people with no moral or intellectual compass is that they just look around them for what's 'working' and attempt to copy that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Roopappy@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

I know how she can test her theory.

Run a primary opponent against her who feels differently. Let the market decide.

Lmao fuck that and fuck you, Slotkin.

[–] AntelopeRoom@lemm.ee 10 points 1 day ago

Elissa, stop running your mouth and do it yourself if you have a better idea.

[–] GlendatheGayWitch@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

If they quack like a republican and walk like a republican, they're a republican

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 10 points 2 days ago

This is the DINO that went on after HitlerPig's SOTU and tried to sell the absurd concept that millions of people voted straight Democratic tickets, except for HitlerPig at the top.

Sure, there were probably some dummies rhat did that, but they're as rare as white squirrels. She's just the water carrier for the same old weak, spineless weenie Dems who are perfectly happy being smug about their "peaceful transfer of power" to Nazis who obviously rigged the election.

[–] BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

You will not win running on a Republican platform,but half baked. That's what we have been shown. I will support the lesser evil, but no one else will. Harris never really attacked the rich. Who are you going to elect? "Immigrants are the problem but hey guys let's not be too hasty" or "IMMIGRANTS ARR The PROBLEM! KILLKILLKILL". I don't like either, but you both identify the same people (wrongly) as the main problem in society, and then they offer a (mosterous but still concrete) solution, while you offer nothing.

[–] Nualkris@lemm.ee 9 points 2 days ago

Fuck that! I want my progressive cadidates woke AF!

[–] harmsy@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

Sounds like a moron who needs to be primaried.

[–] RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

I'm an independent but mostly lefty guy and this lady has never sat well with me. She's a corporate dem through and through.

[–] burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

kamala never mentioned identity politics on the campaign

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

"Dem senator is a compromised lackey"

Yeah, no shit. That's the problem.

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Just another clueless asshole.

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago

Put her near the top of the list to be primaried.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

“Everyone you mentioned has a lot of words, but what have they actually done to change the situation with Donald Trump and the cuts and the attacks on our judiciary and the attacks on our Constitution?” asked Slotkin, who claimed her responsibilities fighting Trump’s government cuts forced her “to be more than just an AOC.”

Fair.

“I can’t do what she does because we live in a purple state, and I’m a pragmatist,” she concluded.

🙄

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

who claimed her responsibilities fighting Trump’s government cuts forced her “to be more than just an AOC.”

Alright, why are you less than an AOC then?

I understand all of the "we can't just be activists, we have to be effective and use our power" arguments if (a) you have power -- which they're split-minded about, sometimes it's "well, you know we are the minority party" and sometimes it's bullshit like this -- and (b) you use it to do something more than an activist does. The minority party in the Senate has done less than be activists. They caved and gave Trump the continuing resolution he needed to continue dismantling the government and wiping his ass with the Constitution. Slotkin isn't even doing as much as Corey Booker.

They had leverage and they refused to use it, because despite all of the rhetoric, deep down they still believe this is the time for politics as usual.

We're well along the path where we could be post-political in a real sense, where political enemies are sent to the gulag in CECOT or "suicided" by shooting themselves in the back of the head. As a former CIA person ought to know, changes in rhetoric aren't going to save you from that.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 7 points 2 days ago

It's time to realize the only ones who are to save us from ourselves is us.

[–] Bosht@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Hooray another sack of shit politician attempting to derail from real issues

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›