this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2025
136 points (98.6% liked)

Mildly Interesting

20185 readers
723 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CidVicious@sh.itjust.works 24 points 5 days ago (2 children)

This is a little bit unfair to paleoartists. A lot of the drawings people are most familiar with came from a time when there was less evidence for feathers. They absolutely update drawings as more fossils are found that change the picture, but we don't always go and look at the newest art. Just how much feather cover specific dinosaurs would have had is still a bit unknown but it's unlikely they would have had anywhere near as much feather cover as modern birds.

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 25 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I love the art in Dinosaurs: New Visions of a Lost World. Such an amazing book!

collapsed inline media

collapsed inline media

collapsed inline media

(Sinosauropteryx, archeopteryx and anurognathus. And BTW the colours are accurate. We can find out now.)

[–] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Sorry but that last one is just so fucking goofy looking. If that thing came to attack me I would just die of laughter and it would then be able to eat me.

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Why would it attack you? It was the size of a budgie. Really doubt a budgie would be able to eat you no matter how hard it would try.

[–] XM34@feddit.org 4 points 4 days ago

I mean, really depends on the time period. Bugs are a surprisingly bad frame of size reference depending on the time period. Tha little insect might actually be human sized ^^'

[–] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Who knows. Animals can behave strangely sometimes. I also missed the bug so I had no idea how big it would be.

Sounds like a successful hunting tactic to me

[–] Derpenheim@lemmy.zip 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I have to disagree with that last point. Dinosaurs lasted a LONG time, and while.early dinosaurs certainly had little feather coverage, such as stegosaurus, later dinosaurs, such as yutyrannus and therozinosaurus, were absolutely covered.

Now, there were not "feathers", but feather like structures that eventually evolved into feathers in their descendants

[–] Blooper@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

What's a feather like structure look like?

[–] Derpenheim@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 days ago

Small, flaky scales that protruded out from the body

[–] MBech@feddit.dk 17 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Looks about as terrifying as they behave with feathers.

[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Well, I can confirm their geese cousins know who they are under those feathers.

[–] djsp@feddit.org 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)
[–] flicker@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 4 days ago

It's triggering some sort of primal fear response in me. Which, honestly, I think is a good thing.

[–] keen@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (2 children)
[–] ickplant@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

We believe you.

[–] lord_ryvan@ttrpg.network 2 points 4 days ago

Username checks out, eh?

[–] Kompressor@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

I hate its little zergling arms.

[–] atomicorange@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

Kinda captures their essential nature, though. The fluff is pretty deceptive.

[–] maniclucky@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Those pokemon are metal as fuck.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 5 days ago

Looks like an illustration from All Yesterdays.

Majestic creatures