this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2024
1 points (66.7% liked)

politics

23928 readers
2778 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago

Good think the dems had another candidate with the exact same ideology (pro-genocide).

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

That's what they get for holding the debate during nap time.

[–] cyd@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

His trips to Europe were two weeks before the debate...

Anyway, I thought they were blaming a cold and/or being over-prepared...

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

His team is in shambles. It’s a fucking disgrace. It’ll cost us the Republic.

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Your comment reminds me of a comment one of my undergrad profs said once, which was something like "no one in Rome on September 4, 476 AD looked at each other and said 'Holy shit! This is The Fall of Rome!"

If Biden loses and a second Trump admin enacts all the shit we're worried about, I think future historians will move the date of The Fall of the U.S. a lot further back.

[–] NoSuchAgency@reddthat.com 0 points 11 months ago

All of the above and whatever else they can think of

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

From the article:

Biden did make several trips in the weeks leading up to the debate. On June 13, the president joined other leaders for the Group of Seven summit in Apulia, Italy. Two days later, he flew to Los Angeles for a celebrity-filled fundraiser alongside former President Barack Obama, where his campaign said he raised at least $28 million, per a report from Politico.

Reuters reported that Biden headed to Camp David on June 21 to begin debate prep six days before he took the stage. White House aides who traveled with the president told Reuters that Biden was "in a good mood" on his way to prepare.

So, let me get this straight. Two-ish weeks before the debate, he travelled to Europe to visit our allies for two days. Then he visits LA for a day. Then, a week before the debate, he goes to Camp David to prepare. And that's the strenuous schedule that made him almost fall asleep on stage? And that's supposed to make me feel better? I read another article where it went into a little more detail and said that they didn't even start debate prep until 11 am each day at Camp David, and included scheduled time for an afternoon nap, so it's not exactly like they were working him like a rented mule. This makes it seem so much worse, imo. The president has to do a lot more strenuous stuff than debates, and if he's worthless for weeks after two days of travel, that doesn't bode well for the coming campaign season.

[–] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

It's kind of sad, but we have to temper expectations on both of the candidates. These two both hit retirement age over a decade ago and we're trying to put them in potentially the most stressful job in the nation.

  • Hostilities were mostly over, but these two were technically alive during World War 2.
  • The first meeting of the United Nations was after these two were born.
  • The current incarnation of India as a country is younger than these two.
  • They're both older than NATO.
  • We only had 48 states when these two were born.
  • These two were already out of high school when Martin Luther King delivered his speech.

I could just keep going forever on these. I am not sure that this is the job for anyone so far removed from their prime.

[–] NoSuchAgency@reddthat.com -1 points 11 months ago

Sure doesn't, but they're grasping as many straws as they can

[–] verdantbanana@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

his time as career politician should have been an indication but everyone seems lost on the fact he likes the color blue and has a different name other than Trump

maybe colors and letters are not the best indicator of how someone will perform on the job

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Then again, you could look at their actual track records.

[–] NoSuchAgency@reddthat.com -1 points 11 months ago

I think they see the same thing we see, a pushover that they can control. That explains why his policies and stance on things is not the same as it used to be

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Fucking hell, he’s toast. Replace him or we’ll get trump.

[–] charles@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Replace him and we'll get Trump

[–] dogsnest@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

replier plays games to deflect their illiteracy.

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

~~Coercing~~ Convincing someone who doesn’t want the job is not a solution.

[–] dogsnest@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

replier plays games to deflect their illiteracy.

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

lol - I’m not the one who deleted and replaced my entire comment.

I purposely left the part you complained about so people could see the context.

And the point I made was it didn’t matter the difference in word choice. The original point still stands; “Coerce” or “convince”.

[–] dogsnest@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

lol, i dindu wot u said but she said then I did, but I didn't, so there, lolol.!

The point still stands tho!

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Which part confused you? I’m happy to help you understand if you like.

[–] NoSuchAgency@reddthat.com 0 points 11 months ago

I think it's too late to replace him unless he decides to step down. Of course they could use the 25th amendment but I doubt they will. When Trump was in office, they brought up the 25th amendment nonstop

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Biden also reportedly stressed that he was apologetic for his debate performance but told supporters it was "critical" to beat Trump in November. Polling has shown that the candidates are neck and neck, even after Thursday's debate in which Biden's demeanor sparked concern among Democrats.

One of the few things I agree with Biden on...

Beating trump is the most important thing, and Biden looks like he might not be up to it.

He just refuses to step aside, because it's not about beating trump to him, it's about him beating trump.

And it's insane to put it on an 81 year that keeps sundowning.

[–] NoSuchAgency@reddthat.com -1 points 11 months ago

I'm not seeing any polls that show them neck and neck. I believe Bidens just all about staying in power. Same with his wife and the others that have been lying to the public about his well-being. I think it's elder abuse.

[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

OP is a tagged trump supporter

[–] NoSuchAgency@reddthat.com 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] NoSuchAgency@reddthat.com 0 points 11 months ago

Right back to ya

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

If the media can get a presidential candidate to drop out just by repeatedly asking him to then why the fuck aren’t they calling for Trump to step down?

Because they’re full of shit. That’s why.

[–] ZombieMantis@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

The difference is Biden might be able to be convinced to put the fate of the nation over his own position in office. Trump has no such concerns to appeal to.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com -1 points 11 months ago

this is what gets me. Even barring the insurrection itself his unwillingness to accept his loss and not cooperating with the handover. Its funny I remember bush junior was known for not working with the clinton administration on the handover coming in which caused them to be unaware of the al-kaida threat and then trump won't prep the incoming administration. so they are resistant acting properly both coming and going. Myabe the republican party should drop out of running canidates in presidential elections due to incompetence.