this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2025
422 points (99.1% liked)

politics

23222 readers
3243 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A new CBS News/YouGov poll showed that Americans are increasingly critical of Trump's handling of the economy, and that more people are blaming him than a month earlier. It surveyed 2,410 U.S. adults from April 8 to 11.

When asked whose policies are more responsible for the state of the economy, 54% said they believe Trump's policies are more to blame. Only 21% said they believe Biden's policies are to blame. 20% said both of their policies are equally to blame, while 5% said neither are to blame for the state of the economy.

This compares to a March CBS News poll, when 38% of respondents said they blamed Biden for inflation, while only 34% blamed Trump.

A poll from YouGov and The Economist also showed that more Americans are blaming Trump for the economy.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] underwater@sh.itjust.works 79 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Because he’s the one currently tanking the economy. Fuck Trump - even as a conservative, I can say that he and the current Republicans are awful. They singlehandedly pushed me into becoming a conservative Democrat since 2015-2016. Blue Dog Democrat or whatever.

[–] Kalon@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Remember when Republicans seemed concerned with reducing debt? Guess some may still say that but look what's happening with spending now at the same time they are cutting everything, and still looking to increase tax cuts for top earners. 😩

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Remember when Republicans seemed concerned with reducing debt?

Literally no. Please tell me when this was.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 12 points 2 weeks ago

They've long said it, but never shown it through actions. Just used it as a cudgel to beat social programs.

[–] kewjo@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

every time we had a D president, the concern goes away it's an R in office and then spending goes through the roof.

[–] shawn1122@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Literally everytime a Democrat is elected.

The deficit increased under Reagan, Bushx2 and Trump.

Its a core tenet of their playbook to drive up the deficit via tax cuts (especially for rich) and increased military spending and then scream about the deficits when Democrats are in power such that the focus shifts from improving public services (via increased government spending) to balancing the budget.

They did this to Clinton, Obama and Biden.

It's been a perpetual cycle since Reagan introduced supply side / trickle down economics as a political platform. Prior to that billionaires were actually taxed fairly and had to give back to society in order to maintain a positive perception within their community.

[–] kobra@lemm.ee 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I remember when a democrat balanced the budget and gave the US a surplus from 1998-2001

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And destroyed the economy as a result.

Public sector growth (federal budget surplus) is private sector atrophy.

You can keep the charade going through risky debt, like mortgage-backed securities. But since there’s no new money entering the economy, those will eventually collapse. And they did.

[–] kobra@lemm.ee 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Whatever flaws the Clinton plan had, it was followed by 9/11 and GWB/Obama so I’m not sure how you go back and blame Clinton for that? This feels like blaming Clinton for not having a perfect solution.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 1 points 2 weeks ago

I’m not super interested in blame here. Clinton did something dumb. GWB didn’t undo it.

But neither of them invented this obsession with retiring the US debt — which would in fact retire the US dollar.

It’s not the first time we’ve balanced the budget, after all.

History tells the tale. The federal government has achieved fiscal balance (even surpluses) in just seven periods since 1776, bringing in enough revenue to cover all of its spending during 1817-21, 1823-36, 1852-57, 1867-73, 1880-93, 1920-30 and 1998-2001. We have also experienced six depressions. They began in 1819, 1837, 1857, 1873, 1893 and 1929.

Do you see the correlation?

The one exception occurred in the late 1990s and early 2000s, when the dot-com and housing bubbles fueled a consumption binge that delayed the harmful effects of the Clinton surpluses until the Great Recession of 2007-09.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

all those tourism dollars, lumber exports,,,etc is starting to hurt red states.

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

since 2015-2016

Hah, I would be ecstatic if we had a Romney now instead of what we do have. Or even a McCain. Or hell, even a GWB as long as he wasn't allowed to invade anywhere.

Welcome friend. We may not be as cult like as Maga, but at least our representatives are worthless.

[–] octopus_ink@slrpnk.net 65 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (7 children)

20% said both of their policies are equally to blame

What the fuck is wrong with 20% of respondents? I can understand blaming it on Biden better than I can understand this response.

[–] celeste@kbin.earth 58 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They know it's trump's fault but they voted for him so they have to say biden was just as bad for the economy to justify their decision to themselves. That's my theory.

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 29 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Yep. Trump cultists absolutely can't admit when they are objectively wrong, even as their small business crashes, their investments and retirement shrink or their spouse is deported.

It is a serious personality flaw.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemm.ee 7 points 2 weeks ago

Trump can’t fail us, we can only fail Trump.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

always blame it on trans and wokeness as thier scapegoats. once follows Ytubers who did this, cant admit why thier decline of thier channel was their own doing, instead attacking fans and being mysogynistic towards thier former female employees. once they drank trumps Kool-aid they are basically trumpers now, i find it funny they are tyring to get into Right wing grifting with the incels, but they arnt very successful since they are also POC and asian.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

They're absolutely checked out and ignorant. They have no idea what either's policies actually were and they aren't even paying enough attention to get brainwashed into MAGA, so they just hedge by blaming both.

Those are the vast majority of non-voters who sleepwalked us into fascism, BTW. The Gaza protest types the neolibs keep trying to scapegoat, although indeed idiots who cut off their noses to spite their face, were way too few to be the real cause of Harris's loss.

[–] mister_flibble@lemm.ee 15 points 2 weeks ago

In my limited interaction with people who have moved away from Trump, there seems to be a "well they all actually fucking suck" stage in the middle. Would guess it's that.

[–] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 8 points 2 weeks ago

In any other presidential term, that can be a fair assessment only a few months in. The economy can be compared to a Panamax oil tanker - it moves with huge momentum and can’t be steered quickly.

But this tariffs nonsense detonated a bomb below the waterline. You may not be able to steer the ship quickly, but deliberate sabotage can absolutely cripple it and spread damage everywhere. Quarterly 401(k) statements are being sent out, plus it’s tax season, so people are very in touch with how this is impacting them and their money

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 6 points 2 weeks ago

They are ruled by their hatred, and MAGA is a hate group.

[–] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 weeks ago

Radical centrist brainworms

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

probably boomers/ trumpers answering these polls.

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 44 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

"Blame the economy on Biden"

You mean the metrics showing that under Biden at the end we had one of our strongest economies in our nation's history? Of course, all of the excess wealth was going to the 1%, so average dumb red hat wouldn't have noticed.

Polling is irrelevant now anyway. There won't be another free election anytime soon.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 23 points 2 weeks ago

Of course, all of the excess wealth was going to the 1%, so average dumb red hat wouldn't have noticed.

Maybe most of it, but certainly not all. Real wages were consistently going up under Biden, especially for the bottom 10% of earners. This isn't as apparent as it should be partially because he did fuck all to combat price gouging.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 36 points 2 weeks ago

gov going full fascist, journalists pretending polling matters

let the music continue until the titanic is fully sunk

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 30 points 2 weeks ago

Before the next election: "I declare the Democratic party a terrorist organization!"

Poll "problem" solved. At the rate we're going I really don't doubt this. :/

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Inflation drops precipitously under Biden, gets blamed for inflation.

Make it make sense.

[–] lost_faith@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I told you Bidenomics was going to increase inflation. Now, who do you believe, Me, your God, or your lying eyes?

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

God's not real, so lying eyes, 10 out of 10 times.

[–] lost_faith@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago

You do not worship me enough, deported

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

and the wierd Egg inflation gimmick started by vance.

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The economy is being used to distract from the crimes of his followers. Too much concentration on that and not enough on how he wants send US citizens to a prison in a foreign country without any real due process.

[–] mondomon@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Concentration is a good word for this, as in camps.

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Its why I used that word.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 weeks ago

Oh no, Trump is polling poorly? Surely if he wants to be elected again he will change course...

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 17 points 2 weeks ago

"You idiots put me in power and I'm not leaving, don't care."

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemm.ee 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well well well, if it isn’t the consequences of my own actions.

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 2 points 2 weeks ago

This is Trump, he's immune from all consequences.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's cute that people think voters opinions are going to matter much longer.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

They do still rely heavily on their base being supportive as their power base. This is also drivibg a lot of people in minor positions of power not to resist. If that were to evaporate significantly I could could see things changing significantly.

But I doubt it will.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 weeks ago

It’s funny that it usually takes a while for policies to take effect, but 45 and 47 have taken actions to make the effect occur in what must be considered instantaneous in government

[–] Today@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

It usually takes awhile for the new guy's policies to really turn the ship. This time...

[–] selkiesidhe@lemm.ee 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Surveyed 2400 people. Out of that miniscule portion of the population, those were the results.

MAGAts are still fully stuck to drumpfs ass like remora. They will NEVER change their minds.

[–] themagzuz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 week ago

i mean yeah, that's how polling works. you ask a representative slice of the population and extrapolate from there. did you want them to ask all 340 million americans?

looking at another poll conducted by yougov around april 5th-8th, they had a distribution of 48% harris voters to 50% trump voters

i think you're somewhat right though, considering that in that same poll, 81% of "maga republicans" (unsure how they defined that) said they approved of trumps recent tarrifs, with 11% unsure and 7% disapproving source

[–] yarr@feddit.nl 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

True believers will blame anyone and everyone else but Trump. It's been amusing watching the excuses get more and more convoluted. It's especially ridiculous because several times on the run-up to the election, Trump mentioned that if he had ONE DAY in office, he'd fix things.

Now he's in and it's either "well, things are real tricky" or "Biden has crippled us for generations". Totally embarrassing, but it's nothing I didn't expect.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

he said" I dont care about you, just your votes" many times, and different variations too.

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago

Oh no, he is only supported by 150 million people bow. So sad.

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Good for the voters.