this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2025
162 points (94.0% liked)

Showerthoughts

35120 readers
757 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

listening to some presidents of the United States of America.

peaches, specifically.

but I've been thinking about this point with a lot of bands, and songs I love, lately.

also, I know this is crazy, but apparently I forgot there's a ninja fight at the end of the peaches video?

that was surprising.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

fascinating how far we've gotten in the science of abusing every aspect of human psychology

there's so, so many ways to influence others

recently i've been binging some true crime, two videos by two different youtubers, same topic. A mother murdered by her adopted teen son

  • video 1: the mother is presented as a flawed saint, not perfect but with a big heart. the teen is presented as a sociopathic monster, troubled, ungrateful, heartless. the second to last fight he broke her arm. the last fight he killed her. when he spoke of how his mother abused him the youtube comments sang "what a monster, to try to slander his mother after he killed her"

  • video 2: a few more details appear, the focus shifts towards the mother. she once had two adopted sons, the second she adopted so "[her son] can experience having a sibling", some time later CPS had to intervene as the second kid had bars in his windows and a bucket for a toilet. he was deemed troubled and ultimately ran away from home. she had a tendency to fight with her remaining son, degrade him on the basis of his race "if i hadn't adopted you, you'd be standing on the border with the rest of those people" (she might've said "idiots" but i can't be bothered to check). she felt like her teenage son owed her money for phone bills. the narrator here goes into detail how antisocial personality disorders can be caused by both genetic and environmental factors, they can be learnt behaviours. the remaining son often left home and lived with others after he fought with his mother, mostly about money. here the fact he broke her arm in a fight is ommited, just mentions how he lived with another person and thought long if he should come back. he's presented as a troubled teen abused by his mother who taught him heartlessness and who ultimately snapped and killed her. the youtube comments sang "what a terrible woman, how could she treat him like that"

same situation, two videos giving you the "correct" interpretation of the events. if i hadn't accidentally found the other one i wouldn't even have known there was more to the story, it seemed very matter of fact, very objective, just reporting on what happened & the context that caused it.

it's really that simple, all it takes is to pick the facts that suit your narrative and present them, you're not really lying that way, but who would consider it truth either

and that's one tactic amongst many

[–] Pudutr0n@feddit.cl 2 points 2 days ago

Crazy stuff, and yeah. Tip of the iceberg.

This is why I chcukle to myself when people stress the relevance that something is a fact. You can do a whooooole lot of stuff with facts if you know what you're doing.