this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2025
2 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

13164 readers
535 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
2
nets (mander.xyz)
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/science_memes@mander.xyz
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HungryJerboa@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But aside from donating to NGOs dedicated to cleaning up ocean litter, the average person has very little way to reduce the number of plastic nets in the water. It requires lifting fishermen out of poverty, teaching them more sustainable fishing practices, and cracking down on littering, all things that require international cooperation.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

the average person has very little way to reduce the number of plastic nets in the water

Besides the obvious and 100% viable option of just not eating fish.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It seems to be working well after about 6 years.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

seems like this comic indicates it's not doing enough

[–] Treble@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Seems the problem is beyond finding a 'cure-all'. Multiple strategies will be necessary.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'd prefer an effective strategy

[–] Treble@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

..which somehow doesn't include producing less garbage?

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

less garbage isn't created regardless of whether you or I buy fish

[–] Treble@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

An individual abstaining from owning slaves didn't reduce slave populations either. Think they were as dumb and ineffectual as I am? Fine.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

so you are moving the goalposts from efficacy to ethics. that's fine, but I don't believe eating fish is unethical.

[–] Treble@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Multitudes of alternatives (plants!) are less cruel and harmful to our planet. Do you disagree?

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 16 hours ago

I don't think eating fish is cruel, nor inherently harmful to the planet. the methods of fishing that have developed, and the scale of modern fishing are problems, but for me to choose to abstain from fish would not mitigate the situation.