this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2025
-54 points (11.4% liked)

You Should Know

35661 readers
763 users here now

YSK - for all the things that can make your life easier!

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with YSK.

All posts must begin with YSK. If you're a Mastodon user, then include YSK after @youshouldknow. This is a community to share tips and tricks that will help you improve your life.



Rule 2- Your post body text must include the reason "Why" YSK:

**In your post's text body, you must include the reason "Why" YSK: It’s helpful for readability, and informs readers about the importance of the content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-YSK posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-YSK posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

If you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- The majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Rule 11- Posts must actually be true: Disiniformation, trolling, and being misleading will not be tolerated. Repeated or egregious attempts will earn you a ban. This also applies to filing reports: If you continually file false reports YOU WILL BE BANNED! We can see who reports what, and shenanigans will not be tolerated.



Partnered Communities:

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

Credits

Our icon(masterpiece) was made by @clen15!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Darkcoffee@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 hours ago (34 children)

Authoritarianism is by the leader of a state or a territory, not by some random dude on Lemmy. Seriously go read the Wikipedia page at least.

[–] tehmics@lemmy.world -4 points 4 hours ago (33 children)

It starts with us.

I came here to get away from censorship, not join it. We need places for open discussion but I'm starting to see that this isn't it either.

This was an opportunity to actually have a discussion about the topic and reinforce virtues of freedom, but it is doing the opposite and illustrating the descent to authoritarianism.

[–] Oni_eyes@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 hours ago (30 children)

Fine, start your own place for all the questions you want.
Which you can do here. Unlike in an authoritarian system.

[–] tehmics@lemmy.world -2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

We used to say the same thing about the internet as a whole, and then the big tech companies crowded out all the smaller options, started controlling narratives and we ended up where we are at now.

I don't want to see the same thing happen with Lemmy instances. We are on the ground floor.

[–] Oni_eyes@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I get that, but this isn't yours to control. So if you want to change the rules (which that instance shows in the sidebar and which the mod showed how op broke two different rules in one of the many replica offended posts this sealion made after getting a comment deleted), make your own instance and don't force it on everyone else.

[–] tehmics@lemmy.world -1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Yep, that's part of my point.

I've already blocked the community over this. Know any alternatives?

[–] L3s@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Just want to make sure I understand, you blocked a community because they removed a post that broke their rules?

[–] tehmics@lemmy.world 0 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)

Yes. I disagree with their rules and their enforcement of them, and this exposed that. So I wont participate in it.

What else would you have me do in that scenario?

It's not like I pour over each community's rules before reading any content that surfaces from them.

[–] L3s@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (2 children)

Because as the mod that removed the post, I'd like to give you my perspective if you'll let me.

  • OP made a post that seemed to break rule 5 (we had multiple reports on it), and did not seem like a good-faith question breaking rule 1, so I removed the post
  • OP then makes a second post being fairly passive towards me, further showing that they were not posting in good-faith. So once again, removed the post for rule 1 and 5, messaged OP as well explaining this. This could have been a temp ban, I was being nice here, and reaching out to give OP the chance to explain they were not posting in bad faith.
  • OP then posts 13 times about the above in other communities, breaking some of the rules in those communities.

As mods it's mayhem if you don't enforce your rules, which is all I was trying to do, we have each rule to keep the community from getting out of control and offtopic. If we had no rules, the community would be filled with a bunch of trolls and offtopic posts.

IMO OP has proved multiple times now that their question was not in good-faith, and they were seeking out arguments (check their other comments) and drama (see the 13 posts).

Icing on the cake: we left their rephrased question up to avoid more of this drama, OP still kept posting the screenshots.

[–] tehmics@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Thanks for taking the time to break it down.

I agree that he isn't acting in good faith, but silencing the discussion is (would be) the bigger issue to me than some silly troll.

I really appreciate your response and reasoning. I don't have an issue with logistical moderation (e.g. duplicate threads) but I'm extremely adverse to moderation of actual topics for what should be obvious reasons.

Given that you left the other thread up, I think I can put away the pitchfork for now. I'll have a look at your rules, and hopefully find myself satisfied and participating in your community.

[–] L3s@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Well thanks for understanding. The question itself was not a problem, hopefully that helps as well.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 0 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Look at the parody where i posted an equally vague post in 'ask lemmy' just moments earlier? Where is my bad faith? Where is my trolling?

https://lemmy.world/post/26618329

This isn't even my first post on your sub. Look at any of the other posts I contributed.

What agenda am I pushing?

Sounds like you've just got it out for me.

Here i am in your "top year"

https://lemmy.world/post/24898604

collapsed inline media

[–] L3s@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Not going to argue with you about it here, but the short is: if that's true, when I messaged you, you should have just had a conversation with me about it instead of all of this.

Have a good one.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world -1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Cause I was getting trolled in the same thread trying not to get frustrated with people!

[–] L3s@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world -1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

What's your excuse. You could have directed me to clarify.

[–] L3s@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Not going to argue with you about it here

This has all been ridiculous.

Have a good one.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 0 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

You're ridiculous

This screenshot:

collapsed inline media

Ridiculous

[–] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 2 points 41 minutes ago* (last edited 40 minutes ago) (1 children)

Rule 5:

No baiting, sealioning, or promoting an agenda.

The fact that you’re spamming this in a bunch of community to pick fights perfectly illustrates the violation of this rule.

So… IMHO- Your post was rightfully removed and done without the irony you’re implying. Despite what you might think, It’s not authoritarian to eject disruptive content.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 0 points 39 minutes ago* (last edited 33 minutes ago) (1 children)

Any of these other questions fall under your definition of baiting? In your opinion?

collapsed inline media
collapsed inline media
collapsed inline media
collapsed inline media

Edit: Why not check tenor of any of the many other posts I've created and participated in?

collapsed inline media

[–] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 2 points 37 minutes ago (1 children)

I’m not going to argue with you. I’m just pointing out something I felt needed to be said.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 1 points 36 minutes ago (1 children)
[–] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 1 points 33 minutes ago (1 children)

No, we aren’t.

The fundamental difference is, I’m not posting what I felt needed to be said across multiple communities and fighting with everyone that tries to tell me that this isn’t the way to go about getting one’s point across- you are.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 0 points 32 minutes ago* (last edited 31 minutes ago) (1 children)

I'm just pointing out something that I feel needs to be said. I don't want to argue.

[–] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 1 points 31 minutes ago (1 children)

No. You’re trolling. And you are very well aware of it.

Read the room. And then stop doing it.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 0 points 30 minutes ago (1 children)
[–] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 1 points 25 minutes ago (1 children)

Pointing out in a reasonable manner what you did wrong so as to answer the countless times you’ve asked across 14 communities?

No, I don’t think I am. But you’re welcome to appeal to the admins of LW by reporting this response to them.

I’m not going to feed your need to debate this any further. I’ve said what I felt you needed to know.

Enjoy your…. Whatever this is.

Stop. Please. You say you don't want to argue then you start arguing again. Please. Im sorry I upset you. It will be ok.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world -2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I didn't break any of their rules. They just selectively chose to decide i was trolling when I was actually getting trolled in the thread.

[–] tehmics@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Don't care. I don't care about your sealioning either.

It is my view that some things should be dealt with through downvotes and discussion, not moderation. Especially when we are talking about authoritarianism of all fucking things.

Moderation in my view is an extreme measure that shouldn't be enacted lightly. And I only want to participate in communities that share that view.

load more comments (28 replies)
load more comments (30 replies)
load more comments (30 replies)