this post was submitted on 21 May 2025
937 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

70259 readers
3636 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FourWaveforms@lemm.ee -3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's already capable of doing a lot, and there is reason to expect it will get better over time. If we stick our fingers in our ears and pretend that's not possible, we will not be prepared.

[–] DoPeopleLookHere@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

If you read, it's capable of very little under the surface of what it is.

Show me one that is well studied, like clinical trial levels, then we'll talk.

We're decades away at this point.

My overall point of it's just as meaningless to talk about now as it was in the 90s. Because we can't convince of what a functioning product will be, never mind it's context I'm a greater society. When we have it, we can discuss it then as we have something tangible to discuss. But where we'll be in decades is hard to regulate now.

[–] Zexks@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Alpha Fold. We're not decades away. We're years at worst.

[–] DoPeopleLookHere@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

If you assume the unlimited power needed right now to power Aloha fold at scale of all human education.

We have at best proof of concepts that computers can talk. But LLMs don't have any way of actually knowing anything behind them. That's kinda the problem.

And it's not a "we'll figure out the one trick" but more fundamentally how it works doesn't allow for that to happen.